Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  animal names
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Parent-Child Interaction and Lexical Acquisition in two Domains: Color Words and Animal Names

100%
Gleason J. B.
Psychology of Language and Communication
|
2014
|
vol. 18
|
issue 3
204-210
EN
This paper explores young children’s and parents’ use of color words and animal names in two published studies. The aim is to compare the ranges and kinds of these words in parentchild interaction and to consider the implications of these findings for our understanding of early lexical development. Color term data were drawn from the Gleason corpus in CHILDES: 12 boys and 12 girls ranging in age from 25-62 months, and their parents. Results showed that parents used and emphasized only the same 10 most basic colors, with many teaching episodes. Parents’ most frequent terms, red, blue, and green were also children’s most frequent terms and are the ones acquired earliest according to MacArthur Bates lexical norms. In the second study CLAN programs were used to identify animal names in corpora from a variety of families in CHILDES, with 44 children ranging in age from 1;6-6;2. Children and parents produced a remarkable number and range of animal terms, with individual preschoolers naming as many as 96 different, often rare, animals, such as crocodile and pelican. Parents and children thus attend to the same limited set of basic color terms. By contrast, biophilia, our shared human love of the living world is reflected in children’s extensive animal lexicon.
2
Content available remote

Vývoj polské, české a slovenské zoonomastiky

100%
Kołodziej A.
Acta onomastica
|
2012
|
vol. 53
|
issue 1
169-187
EN
The paper presents a survey of the study of animal names in West Slavic languages. Within the scope of the survey were the onomastic works from Poland, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The author of the paper has distinguished four main areas of animal names study: the study of animal names in rural areas, of animal names in literature, of animal names in zoos, and of animal names in cities; and has analyzed all of them. The survey revealed that there is a significant disproportion in the number of works published on animal names in the three countries. The topic has been investigated most thoroughly by Polish linguists, and a number of valuable papers has been published in Slovakia. The most popular area of the study has been the study of animal names in rural areas.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

„Mamy dosyć zwierzyny dla nas i sąsiedztwa…” Nazwy zwierząt w nazwach własnych kół łowieckich (przyczynek do badań nad socjolektem myśliwskim)

100%
Janicka-Szyszko R.
Język. Religia. Tożsamość
|
2021
|
issue 2 (24) A
33-48
EN
The aim of the article is the analysis of highly legitimized proper names of hunting associations, with compounds related to animal names. There is also the attempt to establish the reasons of the choices which may indicate the values appreciated by hunters. In total, 1.575 (out of 2.705 collected) names, with one of the compounds having a common animal name, were gathered and analyzed. The names belong to one of the most common types of compounds in the names of hunting associations. Out of 1.575 there are 138 unique ones. 52 compounds were used individually, while 86 were used twice or up to 119 times. The analyzed names not only differentiate the hunting clubs but also reflect passions and interests of hunters and conceptualize their appreciated values. Moreover, the names are the key element which forms the identity of members of hunting associations and builds their affiliations stronger.
4

Benamingen van dieren in de Nederlandse en in de Tsjechische vaste adjectivische vergelijkingen in de spiegel van de geschreven corpora

86%
Křížová K.
Neerlandica Wratislaviensia
|
2017
|
vol. 27
37-46
EN
nimal names or zooappellatives constitute an important part of the idioms and proverbs in the majority of natural languages. The Dutch idioms with an animal element were described from various perspectives by Kowalska-Szubert (1996). The Czech idioms with animal names were the subject of various studies carried out e.g. by Mrhačová (Mrhačová et al. 2000, Mrhačová-Kouptsevitch 2004). In this article we compare by the means of corpus research the use of animal names in the adjective-based similes in the current written Dutch and in the current written Czech. This research is based on the excerpta of the largest written corpora available for the Dutch and the Czech, namely the Corpus Contemporary Dutch and the Corpus Contemporary Czech SYN version 5.
5
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Konstrukcje porównawcze z komponentem animalistycznym w kilku krótkich utworach prozatorskich Adolfa Dygasińskiego

72%
Koszyka E.
Rozprawy Komisji Językowej ŁTN
|
2015
|
vol. LXI
111-123
PL
W artykule omówionych zostało 35 konstrukcji porównawczych zawierających nazwę zwierzęcia, użytych przez Adolfa Dygasińskiego w jego krótkich utworach prozatorskich. Podjęto również próbę ustalenia, w jakim stopniu zastosowanie przez autora w porównaniach nazw zwierząt wypływa z jego specyficznego, nacechowanego uczuciowo stosunku do nich, a w jakim jest tylko i wyłącznie wynikiem tendencji naturalistycznych. Przedstawiono strukturę komparacji; wyróżniono porównania proste, rozbudowane oraz spiętrzone. Zbadano również, w której części porównania występuje nazwa zwierzęcia; wyodrębniono trzy grupy: 1) zwierzę jest przedmiotem porównania; 2) zwierzę jest obiektem porównywanym; 3) zwierzę jest przedmiotem i obiektem porównania. Starano się również przedstawić miejsce tego typu porównań w twórczości innych pisarzy pozytywizmu: Bolesława Prusa, Henryka Sienkiewicza oraz Elizy Orzeszkowej.
EN
The article describes 35 comparisons with animal names used by Adolf Dygasiński. It also attempts to assess whether Dygasiński used these comparisons in relation to his emotional attitude towards animals or merely from his naturalistic tendencies. The identified comparisons are divided into simple and two types of complex. The article also analyzes the allocation of animal names in comparison structure and divides them into three groups:1) the animal is the subject of comparison, 2) the animal is the object of comparison, 3) the animal is both the subject and object of comparison comparisons are divided into simple, two types of complex. The article also analyzes the allocation comparisons with animal names in works of other positivist authors (Bolesław Prus, Henryk Sienkiewicz and Eliza Orzeszkowa).
6
Content available remote

Přechylování jmen živočichů

72%
Albrechtová B.
Naše řeč (Our Speech)
|
2016
|
vol. 99
|
issue 5
243-255
EN
The derivation of opposite gender forms in the case of animal names is a peripheral language phenomenon which is not covered by grammars in sufficient detail. Therefore, grammars sometimes contain simplified and inaccurate statements. This article describes occurrences of derived opposite gender forms of animal names in dictionaries and their usage. Some of the statements included in grammars are either disproved or further specified here. For example, this article proves the productivity of the frequently overlooked suffix -ka and points out the complexity of markedness of derived opposite gender forms. Although the article is primarily synchronic, it also deals with historical development where necessary.
7
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Gniazda słowotwórcze w badaniach historycznojęzykowych (na materiale polskiej leksyki animalistycznej)

72%
Waśkowski K., Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach, Krzysztof Waśkowski. Doktor nauk humanistycznych w zakresie językoznawstwa. Specjalizuje się w badaniach historycznojęzykowych z. w. s. n. d. p. z. w. W. o. s. z. l. s. u. p. z. s. h., waskowski.krzysztof@gmail.com
Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Studia Indogermanica Lodziensia. Supplementary Series
|
2015
|
vol. 4
EN
The article presents a proposal for the use of nests word formation for the diachronic research. By using derivatives from the base KOŃ, we reconstructed panchronic nest formative, so that we could get to know the dynamics of lexis. We pointed derivations of varying degrees fixation in the history of Polish - derivatives stable, lost and new, as well as we trying to define the characteristic features of the derivation of this fragment vocabulary.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono propozycję zastosowania słowotwórstwa gniazdowego do badań o charakterze historycznojęzykowym. Wykorzystując derywaty od bazy KOŃ, zrekonstruowano panchroniczne gniazdo słowotwórcze, na podstawie którego można było orzekać o dynamice słownictwa. Wskazano wiec wyrazy pochodne o różnym stopniu utrwalenia w dziejach polszczyzny – derywaty stabilne, zaginione oraz nowe, jak również próbowano określić charakterystyczne cechy derywacji omawianego fragmentu słownictwa.
8

Nazwy obiektów terenowych z Warmii i Mazur motywowane nazwami zwierząt

58%
Biolik M.
Prace Językoznawcze
|
2014
|
issue 16/4
17-32
EN
Ninety four local names from Warmia and Mazury are described in this article. All of them were created with use of animal names. They were created throughout the ages by Old Prussians, Germans and Poles who lived in the region. The names have been divided into three groups. The first one contains lost names, used during the interwar period. The second group contains names used during the interwar period and accounted for during terrain exploration in the end of the 20th century and in the beginning of the 21st century. The third group contains names used by the people who migrated to the region after the year 1945, not accounted for before that time. On the basis of the used names it can be said that the region was inhabited by forest animals such as: beavers, badgers, wild boars, deer, hedgehogs, moles, foxes, moose, mice, bears, lynxes, aurochs, wolves, hares and domesticated animals such as: bulls, mares, horses, cats, goats, cows, sheep, pigs and oxen. The Old Prussian names account for aurochs and foxes. German and Polish names used after the year 1945 account for: foxes, badgers, wolves, bears, deer, beaver, cats, goats, oxen, hares and cows, horses, sheep and pigs. Microtoponyms used nowadays contain animal motives such as: beaver, badger, bull, wild boar, deer, hedgehog, mare, horse, cat, goat, cow, fox, moose, mouse. All analyzed names are the testimony of the past language and culture of the inhabitants of the region. They are the evidence of the bond formed by the man and environment.
9

Konfrontative Analyse polysemer Tierbezeichnungen im Polnischen und Deutschen

58%
Szulc-Brzozowska M.
Roczniki Humanistyczne
|
2017
|
vol. 65
|
issue 6: Językoznawstwo
69-92
PL
Przedmiotem niniejszej analizy są polisemiczne leksemy języka niemieckiego i polskiego oznaczające zwierzęta. Analiza kontrastywna dotyczy jedynie tych znaczeń, które stanowią metaforyczne rozszerzenia odnoszące się do ludzi. Bazują one na „asocjatywnych stereotypach” (Kilian 2005). Wyróżnione zostały trzy obszary odniesienia wartościowania danego określenia, mianowicie poziom umysłowy, zachowanie oraz wygląd / percepcja. Mogą się one w niektórych przypadkach zazębiać. Porównywane pary leksemów wykazują ekwiwalencję w różnym stopniu, łącznie z ekwiwalencją zerową, która najbardziej przemawia za asocjatywno-stereotypowym charakterem badanych znaczeń.
EN
The object of the present analysis are polysemous animal lexemes. Only meanings of lexemes are described and compared, which comprise metaphorical extensions referring to intellectual level, human behavior and appearance. These metaphorical extensions are based on „associative stereotypes” (Kilian 2005), i.e. on conventional, collective semantic features attributed to certain animal species, which are neither objective nor verifiable in terms of truth and falsity. The compared pairs of lexemes can be equivalent to different degrees, including the zero equivalence, which most of all denote the associative and stereotypical character of the examined meanings.
DE
Den Gegenstand des vorliegenden Beitrags bilden polyseme deutsche und polnische Tierbezeichnungen. Ihre metaphorischen Bedeutungen, wenn sie sich auf Personen beziehen und auf „assoziativen Stereotypen“ (Kilian 2005) beruhen, werden kontrastiv behandelt. Bei der Wertung der jeweiligen Lexeme werden drei Bezugsbereiche unterschieden: Intellekt, Verhalten und das Äußere. Diese Bereiche können sich überschneiden. Die verglichenen Lexempaare weisen unterschiedliche Äquivalenzstufen auf, darunter die Nulläquivalenz, die am stärksten für den assoziativ-stereotypen Charakter der analysierten Bedeutungen spricht.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.