Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  anthropogenesis
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
Anthropolinguistics is one the most recent theoretical and practical perspectives developed within the science of linguistics. As such, it focus on the central question of the evolution of human thinking and its reflection in language. It is proposed that on the basis of evolutionary processes, it is possible to put forth a view according to which any further development of humanity depends on the presence and steady development of specialist lexicon. It secures the advancement of humanity in science, industry and culture.
EN
The article discusses the genesis of man, the human nature and the vision of the future of mankind. In a synthetic way it presents the main stages of the process of anthropogenesis. It describes the dual nature of modern man (biological and cultural nature). The article refers to the emergence of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) as a challenge for humanity.
PL
Artykuł omawia genezę człowieka, istotę natury ludzkiej oraz wizję przyszłości ludzkości. W syntetyczny sposób przedstawia główne etapy procesu antropogenezy. Opisuje dwoistą naturę współczesnego człowieka (naturę biologiczną i kulturową). Artykuł odnosi się do pojawienia się Sztucznej Ogólnej Inteligencji (AGI) jako wyzwania dla ludzkości.
EN
This paper deals with the connection between the origin of the human race and the evolving universe in the works of Teilhard de Chardin, the French thinker analysed this problem from different points of view: scientific, philosophical and theological, showing its different aspects.The results of his reflections on this topic form a system of thought in which Teilhard tried to explain the mystery of man and the universe, the main concept of this system is the evolution of the whole universe from a material into a spiritual reality. Part of this cosmic evolutionary process is also the origin of the human race (considered by Teilhard as a species of living creatures and only accidentally as individual human beings). Creation of the world and man according to Teilhard is also a continual process in which God uses the natural law of evolution. Man is the best part and the summit of this cosmic process, the human race has been craeted by God as one philum (monophiletism) and not as a couple (Adam and Eve in the garden of Eden) or many phila (poliphiletism). While creating human souls, God also uses the material elements of the world, sublimating them into spirit, these opinions created many problems for the Catholic Church and were not accepted. Teilhardian analyses of the future of the universe and mankind are very interesting and inspiring and have been used by many modern thinkers. Teilhard wrote about one global society united by science and technology (globalisation). In the future people will also form one sphere of human spirit, the sphere of common information (noosphere). Eschatologically, the whole universe along with the human race will be united with God as the mover and final cause of the cosmic evolution (its point Alpha and Omega).The end of the history of all created reality will be the transformation into spiritual reality of the Cosmic Christ, thus anthropogenesis will be fulfilled in cosmogenesis and finally in Christogenesis.
PL
Kwestia pochodzenia narzędziowych kompetencji człowieka jest jedną z kluczowych zagadek antropogenezy. Przez ostatnie lata przeprowadzano eksperymenty mające na celu ocenę umiejętności małp człekokształtnych w zakresie wytwarzania narzędzi kamiennych. Interpretacje wyników przeprowadzonych eksperymentów są źródłem licznych kontrowersji zarówno w ocenie narzędziowych kompetencji małp człekokształtnych jak też ekstrapolacji tych umiejętności w zakresie prób ustalenia źródeł narzędziowych kompetencji naszych praprzodków.
EN
The question of the origin of human tool competence is one of the key mysteries of anthropogenesis. In recent years experiments have been carried out to verify the competence in the production of stone tools by apes. Interpretations of the results of the experiments are the source of a serious controversy both in the assessment of the tool competence of apes as well as in their extrapolation of these skills to determine the sources utilities competence of our ancestors.
EN
The author defines the terms of management efficiency by training teachers in the framework of philosophical and anthropological doctrine and establishes the constituent components of the process of teachers training management. The study used the interpretational and analytical method and critical-constructive analysis. With the help of these methods it is established that the conditions of effectiveness of management of teachers training in the framework of philosophical and anthropological doctrine are: improved management attention due to the differentiated needs of students and teachers; management in the context of student-oriented goals, strategy, structure; accounting natural abilities of the individual in the process of innovation; increased attention to the harmonization of relations and interaction between the subjects of the pedagogical process. Management of the teachers training process on the basis of philosophical and anthropological doctrine promotes humanistic outlook, the components of which can be considered as an organic focus for each person as having some value and inalienable rights and responsibilities; recognition of anthropological values (life, physical and mental health of students, respect for their rights and freedoms) as a priority; the formation of the valuable relation to each day and the period of life; recognition and the organic perception of humanistic education (integral development of man as a person, harmony with nature, society, by itself, create a comfortable emotional conditions in an educational institution). It is focused on education as an important component of the educational process, as well as interaction, dialogue, mutual movement of students and teachers to meet each other; awareness that successfully train and educate only in conditions of mutual respect. The results can be used in the preparation of curricula on pedagogy and history of pedagogy, in the writing of textbooks and manuals for students. Prospects for further research within the philosophical and anthropological doctrine are: the problem of a child development in the preschool period, since significant anthropological load can be detected only in the first years of his life and can be indexed by anthropogenic measurements needed for the study of the psychology of the student; philosophical and anthropological acmeology doctrine in training and education, methodological problems of vital and creative personality, phenomenological and cultural anthropology in education, which opens the possibility of cross-cultural comparative studies of the anthropological approach.
EN
The eternal damnation is the first consequence of original sin. This truth has been confirmed by the Church through centuries, issuing unequivocal judgments in this matter, which remain valid until today. The teaching of the synod in Carthage (411), which speaks directly of the eternal condemnation of people who died in original sin, is confirmed by successive synods, councils and contemporary documents of the Church. This is also the teaching of the Catechism. The fundamental problem is that Magisterium links the teaching of original sin with the unscientific truth about human origins present on the pages of the Bible. At the same time, learning about original sin is the indispensable basis for the preaching of salvation. The conflict (or at least the tension) between science and faith is obvious, and the attempts made do not seem to notice the essence of the problem or it is treated in a banal way. It is difficult to justify, however, that it is the result of the offence of one human couple. Therefore, it is necessary to debate the reality of  "original sin" and to reconcile it with the modern state of knowledge.
PL
Wieczne potępienie jest pierwszą konsekwencją grzechu pierworodnego. Tę prawdę Kościół potwierdzał przez stulecia, wydając w tej materii jednoznaczne orzeczenia, które do dzisiaj zachowują swoją ważność. Nauczanie Synodu w Kartaginie (411), mówiące wprost o wiecznym potępieniu ludzi zmarłych w grzechu, potwierdzają kolejne synody, sobory i współczesne dokumenty Kościoła. Taka jest też nauka Katechizmu. Zasadniczym problemem jest fakt, że Magisterium wiąże nauczanie o grzechu pierworodnym z nienaukową prawdą o pochodzeniu człowieka obecną na kartach Biblii. Jednocześnie nauka o grzechu pierworodnym jest koniecznym fundamentem przepowiadania o zbawieniu. Konflikt (a przynajmniej napięcie) pomiędzy nauką a wiarą jest oczywisty, a czynione próby wydają się nie dostrzegać istoty problemu albo problem ten bagatelizować. Trudno jednak uzasadnić, że grzech pierworodny jest skutkiem przewinienia jednej ludzkiej pary. Konieczna jest więc debata na temat rzeczywistości „grzechu pierworodnego” i uzgodnienie jego rozumienia ze współczesnym stanem wiedzy, zwłaszcza w perspektywie możliwego wiecznego potępienia wszystkich niezbawionych.
RU
Автор статьи реконструирует основное ядро антропологических и историософских взглядов Стефана Симотюка. Особое внимание уделяется тезису о избытке энергии чело-веческого существования, который является одним из основных предположений в понятии человека как homo inquietus. Это также указывает на трудности, которые это предположение подразумевает. Статья закрывает столкновение гипотезы Стефана Симотюка об изначальном древнем образе жизни предка человека с последними археологическими находками и выводами палеонтологов. В заключение автор утверждает, что для тезиса об энергетическом превосходстве дочеловека, если мы хотим его сохранить, нужно найти совершенно другое объяс-нение, чем первобытная жизнь на деревьях, постулированная Стефаном Симотюком.
EN
The author of the article reconstructs the main core in the anthropological and historiosophical views of Stefan Symotiuk. The subject of special attention is made by the thesis about the excess of energy of human existence, which is one of the main assumptions in the concept of human as homo inquietus. It also indicates the difficulties that this assumption implies. The article closes the clash of the hypothesis of Stefan Symotiuk about the originally arboreal way of life of the human ancestor with the latest archaeological findings and findings of paleontologists. In conclusion, the author states that for the thesis of the energetic superiority of the prehuman, if we want to maintain it, a completely different explanation should be found, than the originality of arboreal life postulated by Stefan Symotiuk.
EN
The article presents the nineteenth-century philosophical dispute between Karol Libelt and Stefan Pawlicki on the subject of anthropogenesis. This was initiated by the archaeological discoveries in Lake Czeszewskie, a part of Libelt’s estate. In fact, the controversy concerned the problem of whether the chronology of human history set out in the Bible could be questioned, or was still relevant. Libelt advocated the overriding importance of empirical evidence, while the conservative position was pursued by Pawlicki. Thus, it was a controversy pitting two worldviews against each other, in which - for both polemicists - archaeology was only a tool to justify their own beliefs. The article discusses the arguments used by both philosophers to defend their positions, and considers how they sought to interpret archaeological discoveries. In conclusion, it assesses the impact that this dispute had both on the philosophers themselves and on Polish science.
PL
Artykuł przedstawia dziewiętnastowieczny spór filozoficzny, jaki na temat antropogenezy toczyli ze sobą Karol Libelt i Stefan Pawlicki. Powodem rozpoczęcia sporu były znaleziska archeologiczne na Jeziorze Czeszewskim należącym do posiadłości Libelta. Spór w istocie dotyczył tego, czy chronologia dziejów ludzkości zawarta w Biblii jest możliwa do podważenia, czy też nadal zachowuje swoją aktualność. Stanowisko o nadrzędności świadectw empirycznych reprezentował Libelt, a stanowisko zachowawcze zajął Pawlicki. Tym samym był to w istocie spór dwóch światopoglądów, w którym dla obu polemistów archeologia była tylko narzędziem uzasadniającym własne przekonania. W artykule została omówiona argumentacja, jaką posługiwali się obaj filozofowie, broniąc swych stanowisk, oraz jak interpretowali odkrycia archeologiczne. W konkluzji został oceniony wpływ, jaki ten spór wywarł na samych filozofów oraz na polską naukę.
EN
This article deals with two concepts of the genesis of religion. The first came from evolutionary anthropology, the second from the theology of religion. The relations of these concepts are presented in the context of the relationship between science and faith, especially – the reception of the theory of evolution by Catholicism. One example is the work of Robin Dunbar, in which he closely links the rise of religion to the process of anthropogenesis, and on the other, the revelatory concept of the genesis of religion, emphasizing the revelation by creatures and creatures. Although religious theologians, such as Marian Rusecki, have historically been skeptical about evolutionist-oriented religious studies, it is worth considering the possibility of a new reception for authors such as Dunbar, by the contemporary Church. Such a reception must be pre-ceded by a reconciliation of terminology and the recognition of a philosophi-cal background, which was indicated in this article. The article’s conclusions are distinguished by the promising compatibility of certain elements of both visions, the usefulness of the above mentioned reception resulting from the universality of the evolutionary paradigm in contemporary science and the noncontradiction of religion and science.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.