Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  attributive
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Predykatywne sposoby wyrażania relacji posiadania

100%
Dłutek A.
Społeczeństwo. Edukacja. Język
|
2014
|
vol. 2
123-133
EN
Almost all languages employ various structures expressing possession. Linguists recognise the rich variety of them. However, from the most general perspective, these structures can be divided into two groups, namely predicative and attributive ones. This division depends on syntactic structures used to express the relation discussed. The main types and subtypes of the realisation of the phenomenon so omnipresent in human categorisation as the relation of possession are presented and illustrated by a number of languages spoken all over the world.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

And þan it wole be a good oynement restoratif… Pre- and Postnominal Adjectives in Middle English Medical Recipes*

88%
Sylwanowicz M.
Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
|
2016
|
issue 25/2
57-71
XX
The present paper concentrates on the use of adjective modifiers in Middle English medical recipes. Although the study of the position of attributive adjectives in Middle English nominal phrases has attracted attention of many scholars (e.g. Norri 1989; Raumolin- Brunberg 1994; Fischer 2004; 2006; Moskowich 2009), there are no studies that would address the use of pre- and postnominal adjectives in the material representing only one genre (here, medical recipes). This paper will investigate several factors that might have determined the position of attributive adjectives in nominal phrases. Hence, the following questions will be considered: (i) was there a direct link between the origin of the adjective and its position in the noun phrase?, (ii) did the use of attributive adjectives only aim to identify the specific referents of the noun phrases or (iii) were there other reasons for their uses (the intended audience, technicality of source texts)?
3

Contextualism, Pragmatics and Definite Descriptions

75%
Vignolo M.
Lodz Papers in Pragmatics
|
2011
|
vol. 7
|
issue 2
291-307
EN
Very few philosophers and linguists doubt that definite descriptions have attributive uses and referential uses. The point of disagreement concerns whether the difference in uses is grounded on a difference in meaning. The Ambiguity Theory holds while the Implicature Theory denies that definite descriptions are ambiguous expressions, having an attributive meaning and a referential meaning. Contextualists have attempted to steer between the Ambiguity Theory and the Implicature Theory. I claim that the early contextualist account provided by Recanati and Bezuidehnout based on the idea that definite descriptions are semantically underdetermined and in need of a completion from the contextually available information through an optional top-down pragmatic process suffers from an explanatory gap.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Je možná nová klasifikace českých kompozit?

51%
Štichauer P.
Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology)
|
2013
|
vol. 95
|
issue 2
113-128
EN
The article offers an overview of Czech compounding based on the classification put forward by Sergio Scalise and Antonietta Bisetto (cf. Bisetto — Scalise 2005; Scalise — Bisetto 2009). The classification is based on a combination of two hierarchical levels of analysis. The upper level divides compounds according to the grammatical (or syntactic) relation between the constituents into coordinate, subordinate and attributive structures. The lower level splits each of the three “macrotypes” into endocentric and exocentric compounds (on the basis of the presence / absence of a head). It is only at this point that the different lexical categories enter the scheme giving rise to various combinations (such as A + N, V + N and so on). Against the background of such a classification, which is in some important respects divergent from the onomasiological approach, the paper also concentrates on two special cases: first, on so‑called parasynthetic compounds of the type modrooký, vysokoškolský, bezvětří, nosorožec and others; second, on so‑called juxtapositions (spřežky), such as pomstychtivý or smysluplný, which are usually left aside within the onomasiological framework not being considered as fully‑fledged compounds.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.