The purpose of the article is to provide initial identifi cation of the problems which arise most often in the practice of formulating statutory authorisation to issue a regulation, in relation to guidelines concerning its content (Article 92 (1) in fi ne of the Constitution). In the author’s view, the main weaknesses of guidelines contained in a statutory authorisation include, inter alia: 1) putting an emphasis on the praxiological values that should be a natural component of any proposed mechanism, such as reliability, effi ciency, effectiveness, effi cacy and regularity; 2) ordering the author of a resolution to allow for the value, implementing of which is an obvious consequence of taking the action specifi ed by the authorisation; 3) indicating the necessity of inclusion of actions which are objectively inseparable from the required action; 4) formulating therein a demand that the authority issuing a regulation be driven by the indicated constitutional values, thus repeating the normative content of the Constitution. An analysis of the practice leads the author to the refl ection of whether
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.