Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  auto-creation
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Pojęcie wolności i jego teoretyczne konotacje

100%
EN
There do exist two basic approaches towards the term ‘freedom’. The first one, is a general approach, related to an universal meaning of the term. The second one, is a particular approach, based on taking/heading for understanding of freedom in plural terms. Both approaches might, but not necessary do, exclude each other. An alternative takes an interpretation of particular freedoms, which simultaneously excludes the existence of a universal freedom (and the other way around). On the other hand, conjunction, i.e. the examination of a universal freedom on the basis of analysis of particular freedoms and/or reconstruction of the term “freedom” on the basis of interpretations and meanings given to particular freedoms. As a follower of the idea of conjunction of both approaches, I’m analyzing in this paper the theoretical connotations of this term such as: the feeling of freedom, its limitations, responsibility, tolerance, auto-creation and self-realization. This is being done for the reason to stress out the depth and the vastness of freedom, as well to let the potential reader reconstruct it.
Kwartalnik Filozoficzny
|
2011
|
vol. 39
|
issue 1
101-115
EN
The article is an attempt to determine the character of the relation between human being and transcendence in Jaspers’ philosophy of existence. Jaspers' concept of existence comes from the anthropological philosophy of Max Scheler, J. G. Herder and Nietzsche's philosophy of human being and is conditioned by the earlier ways of describing human being and it's “place in the universe”. Determining the scope of the term “creation” makes it possible to distinguish between “creation” and “auto-creation” as two aspects of human existence that are inextricably linked in a dialectical relationship. On one hand, the term "creation" can be understood as being created; on the other hand, it can be understood as determining the meaning of existence (auto-creation). It turns out that both “being created” and “auto-creation” are based upon transcendence as a source of all being and therefore cannot be treated separately but only as a part of a dialectical discourse.
EN
This comparative paper analyses in detail the contexts in which the “contingency” category was used by the philosophers mentioned in its title. While Odo Marquard and Richard Rorty situated contingency within the antifundamentalist discourse, especially in the sphere of philosophical anthropology, epistemology and ethics, Jürgen Habermas drew his conception of the contingency of human birth from the “human nature”— related discourse against modern-day genetic engineering. Marquard’s and Rorty’s theories differ in their philosophical assumptions (scepticism vs. neopragmatism). Among others, the author shows that none of the mentioned thinkers accepted the radically relativistic consequences of the debate around the “contingency” conception. In his analyses, he also makes frequent use of Marquard’s distinction between “arbitrarily accidental” and “fatefully accidental.”
PL
Problematyka poruszana w niniejszym artykule stanowi przyczynek do szerszych badań i studiów nad autokreacją. Analizy nad przeobrażeniami twórczymi w biegu życia, wiodą do krystalizacji indywidualnych procesów autokreacji. Wizja świata i wizja siebie ewoluuje w biegu życia, co ma fundamentalny związek z krystalizującą się postawą twórczą i zmiennym obrazem dzieł, które powstają niejako ciągle od nowa, w nowej perspektywie, zrodzonej z przeżyć, doświadczeń i doznań twórcy. Stąd też dzieło stanowi z jednej strony wyraz indywidualności swego twórcy, z drugiej transcenduje go ku światu, a z trzeciej niejako stwarza swojego kreatora. Złożoność refleksji podejmowanych w ramach autokreacji łączy w sobie perspekty- wę egzystencjalną i aksjologiczną, skłaniającą podmiot do wytyczania symbolicz- nych drogowskazów, ku czemu warto podążać z perspektywy autobiograficznej. Narracja autobiograficzna stanowi bowiem swoisty „klucz” do poznania i zrozumie- nia ludzkiej egzystencji. Zwrot w stronę badań biograficznych wiąże się z potrzebą (i możliwością) osadzenia potencjalnych badań nad autokreacją w działaniu twórczym w obrębie paradygmatu interpretatywnego. Tą drogą możliwym staje się dookreślenie indywidualnych profili kształtowania samego siebie w biegu życia w kontekście aktów twórczych. W szerszej perspektywie badawczej, profile te, mogą się stać drogowskazem i świadectwem działań innych ludzi w drodze do samokształtowania się, a ponadto czynią możliwym wyznaczenie podobieństw i różnic miedzy twórcami.
EN
The topic discussed in this article makes a reason for further research and study over the auto-creation. The analysis over a creative transformation in the course of life leads to a crystallisation of individual processes of auto- creation. The vision of the world and ourselves evolves in the course of life which has a crucial connection with a crystallising and creative attitude and a variable picture of works, which are constantly created from the start in a new perspective born from creator’s experience and feelings. Consequently, a piece of work composes, on the one hand, creator’s individuality, on the other hand it exceeds him or her into the world, and finally it makes a new creator. The complexity of reflexions taken up within auto-creation combines an existential and axiological perspective inducing a subject to make symbolic signposts to follow from an autobiographical perspective. An autobiographical narrative makes a crucial key to meet and understand human existence. The return to biographical research links to the necessity (and the possibility) to place a potential study on auto-creation in creative action within the interpretative paradigm. It makes it possible to define individual profiles of self-creation in the course of life in the context of original acts. In the broader research perspective, these profiles may become a signpost and confirmation of other people’s activities on their way to self-education. Moreover, they make it possible to establish similarities and differences between creators.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.