Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 25

first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  bibliology
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
PL
Bibliografia rejestracyjna. Obejmuje publikacje następujacych osób: Wiesław Babik; Adam Bańdo; Hanna Batorowska; Andrzej Dróżdż; Agnieszka Fluda-Krokos; Maria Jazowska-Gumulska; Barbara Kamińska-Czubała; Maria Konopka; Władysław Marek Kolasa; Halina Kosętka; Lilia Kowkiel; Piotr Krywak; Sabina Kwiecień; Beata Langer; Urszula Lisowska-Kożuch; Wanda Matras-Mastalerz; Grzegorz Nieć; Maria Pidłypczak-Majerowicz; Iwona Pietrzkiewicz; Michał Rogoż; Adam Ruta; Stanisław Skórka; Alfred Toczek; Krzysztof Woźniakowski; Ewa Wójcik; Grażyna Wrona
EN
Editorial topics have almost always been included in the field of book studies, but for a long time they were not subjects of systematic research. It was only in the second half of the 20th century, with a rapid development of the publishing market, that interest in editing grew considerably, leading to the emergence within bibliology of a set of questions called today bibliological editing (as opposed to scholarly-historical and philological editing). A need to develop editing understood in this manner was noted by Leon Marszałek (1912–1996), an outstanding Polish publisher, editorin-chief of encyclopaedias and dictionaries at the Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe press, author of scholarly and expert publications in which he consistently popularised the idea of editing as a separate discipline practised as part of book studies, called for comprehensive research to be carried out in this area and attempted to formulate its curriculum. The article is an attempt to reconstruct the editorial concept presented in Marszałek’s most important theoretical works. The author discusses his views on the subject matter in question and the scope of editorial research, its aim, methodological basis as well as interdisciplinary links. It is worth recalling those views as an interesting point of reference for the reflection on the current state of bibliological editing and its status in contemporary books studies.
EN
An analysis of the act of reading included in philosophers’ writings makes it possible to look for answers to the question about whether we can get to know a book at all? This is an epistemological question, a question about the sources, boundaries and goal of cognition. A question all the more important given the fact that it is asked in an era of a shift from typographic to digital culture. Does getting to know a book consist in reading it? If so then what is this process of reading — getting to know a book? Delving into the author’s intentions or perhaps adding one’s own meanings? Passive acquisition of the content included in the work by its author or active interpretation, assuming that the reader is equally important? To what extent is the meaning of a text fixed, to what extent is its content objective and readable equally to all in every act of reading? Is a book an open work, a separate being with some autonomy or perhaps a text is in all circumstances dependent on its author? Does the author have a monopoly on the “correct” reading of a work? And does a correct/true interpretation exist at all?
4
Content available remote

Monasteries and the digital humanities

80%
EN
In humanities, new methodological search in the area of historical research oriented at culture and its different manifestations, also those of the library sense, are often characterized by the interdisciplinarity of research and openness to new research models. They are currently backed up with modern tools and methods based on information technologies. They have also gained an institutional backing of many institutions promoting digital humanities (DH), created mainly in university circles. Improvement in the range of DH is clearly noticeable in the range of research concentrated on the historical aspect of Christianity and its cultural meaning, preserving in the social life practice the cultural goods and religious values. The autopresentations of orders and monasteries in the web - internet websites, blogs, projects devoted to the architectonic reconstruction are supplemented by such tools as digital archives and libraries, personal and geographic databases, bibliographic databases or projects devoted to provenience research - they are becoming a basis for building new Net 3.0 tools necessary for bibliographic and historical research.
EN
The aim of the study is to present the origins and development of academic institutions educating librarians in Poland in 1945–2015, taking into account the institutional and scholarly aspects. In the first part of the paper the author presents the history of various institutions — university faculties, departments and institutes — divided into three chronological periods (1945–1974, 1975–1989, 1990–2015). She takes into account the circumstances surrounding their establishment (including the legal framework), their founders, staff, organisational structures and their changes. In addition, she points to other manifestations of academic life influencing the work of academic library science centres, like conferences and professional journals. In the second part, devoted to a discussion of research into bibliology and information science conducted at Polish universities, the author focuses on the various subjects, treating chronology only as an element organising descriptions of research processes at the various library studies centres. She points to areas of research as well as changes occurring in their subjects in the analysed period, referring to the names of selected scholars and titles of their most important works. Like in part one, she also discusses the social, political and cultural determinants stimulating research processes, paying particular attention to the impact of the new technologies and media. The author’s overview confirms the huge role played by academic institutions engaged in library studies in the consolidation of the position of bibliology as an academic discipline, but at the same time shows how the research profile of book science has been changing in recent years, evolving in the direction of phenomena associated with information science and new technologies.
EN
Faustyn Ciecierski, a Vilnius-based Dominican brother, left an interesting manuscript heritage. It includes Pamiętnik (The diary) from his exile to Siberia in the 1790s, Dziennik wizytatora (The journal of a visitor) written in the years 1821–1832 and supplements to the chronicle of the Lithuanian Dominican brothers. The preserved texts constitute a rich source material for historians – especially the researchers into the history of Dominicans – but also to geographers, travelers, and ethnographers as well as linguists and the literati. The heritage is also an interesting testimony of how the text and books functioned in the Dominican monasteries in Lithuania and Belarus. It allows for establishing new facts related to the artistic output; research, collector and bibliophile interests of the monastery members, their achievements in the fields of education, functioning of the library and archival collections in the Dominican monasteries of the Lithuanian province at the end of the 18th and the first three decades of the 19th century.
EN
The aim of the paper is to paint a retrospective panorama of the theoretical legacy of the post-war Polish book studies. Of key importance to the author is the question of the subject of the discipline and, consequently, its scope. The author discusses directions in book studies and the bibliological process making up, starting in the 1930s and with Jan Muszkowski’s concept, the core tradition and foundation of the theories of book studies: theories built around the paradigm of “life of the book” seeing it as an integrally defi ned process of production, dissemination and consumption; Karol Głombiowski’s functional theory, thanks to which “systemic” and “functional” approaches have become a commonly accepted methodological premise in book studies; concepts formulated by Janusz Dunin, who linked the bibliological tradition of historical, source studies of editorial forms of books with the functional theory and “communication” perspective; theory formulated by Radosław Cybulski, who, in combining the established morphology of the book with a semiotic and communication perspective, adopted “book consumption”, i.e. an integrated system of satisfying the needs of book users, as a functional category to describe the behaviour of participants in the book market; concepts focused on the “social communication situation” as a research category and perspective stemming from a sociological and semiotic reorientation of humanistic thinking. At the end the author discusses trends which in recent years have considerably expanded research perspectives: books in the media space; the “culture of the book” paradigm, which is conducive to an “anthropologisation” of the bibliological process, perceived no longer only institutionally, from the perspective of social communication, but also through relations, interactions and value judgements of people participating in it, which shifts research priorities towards the questions of reading and often also towards “regional” approaches; theory of book art and research into book aesthetics. At the various stages of the development of bibliology and depending on the research perspective, the focus shifted from the book as a cultural artefact and its “life”, i.e. Bibliological process with its institutions, to functions of the book with regard to the public in the process of social and cultural transmission, and, finally, to the public as the creator and user of the culture of the book, the actions of which are “recorded” in bibliological documentation.
EN
This paper surveys the Latin-Greek and Greek-Latin bilingual glossaries known through papyrological evidence, both digraphical and non, focusing on their scripts, book formats, and layouts. The systematic comparison between archaeological evidence and western manuscripts bearing similar texts helps to detect conservative and innovative layout strategies. This article mainly focuses on classical and para-literary texts (thematic and non- thematic bilingual glossaries, glossaries of classical authors), without passing under silence the main bilingual Latin-Greek and Greek-Latin Christian texts.
EN
The history of publishing in Poland encompasses many issues associated with the emergence and dissemination of printed books. Of fundamental significance to the study of these issues are the records of the publishing output: while we have nearly complete — though requiring further exploration — records of this output for 15th–18th centuries, documented in bibliographies and catalogues, the situation is worse when it comes to the 19th and 20th centuries, until the outbreak of the Second World War. In this respect what we need is not only a continuation, but a radical intensification of bibliographic work. This concerns works published in the Latin, Cyrillic, Hebrew and Greek scripts as well as musical notation. Polish book scholars devoted a lot of attention to the beginnings of printing in Poland; the historiography concerning various typographic workshops located in the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth is rich, though it still requires further extensive studies. The scholars were also interested in phenomena influencing the content structure of printed publications, like publishing privileges (in the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth), censorship as well as restrictions imposed by the partitioning powers and later by Poland’s communist authorities, as a result of which Polish publications had to be printed abroad and an independent publishing movement emerged. The scholars’ research interests also focused on books as products of the work of printers and publishers, on the publication of written works. They focused both on the various components of the book (title page, printer’s signet, stemmata etc.) and on its editorial composition as a whole. The scholars’ undoubted achievements in their studies of the history of publishing in Poland are significant, yet in many areas they need to be continued and expanded (an important task is an edition of sources for the study of the history of Polish publishing), and concentrated on the phenomena that stem from developmental tendencies in modern book studies.
PL
Potrzeba dyskusji nad problemami i wyzwaniami współczesnego bibliotekarstwa stała się inspiracją do organizacji lubelskich spotkań bibliologów, informatologów i bibliotekarzy. Platformą dla wymiany doświadczeń i poglądów pomiędzy teoretykami a praktykami stało się Forum, organizowane przez Instytut Informacji Naukowej i Bibliotekoznawstwa UMCS w Lublinie we współpracy z wiodącymi bibliotekami regionu. W roku 2015 odbyły się dwie edycje: pierwsza - 19 marca, pod hasłem „„Nowoczesna biblioteka – nowoczesny bibliotekarz” , druga - 8 października zatytułowana „Nowoczesne formy pracy w bibliotece – możliwości placówek a potrzeby i oczekiwania użytkowników”. Uczestniczyło w nich ponad 200 osób reprezentujących biblioteki różnego typu (publiczne, szkolne, pedagogiczne, naukowe), ośrodki informacji i kultury oraz środowisko badaczy książki i bibliotek z Lublina i Lubelszczyzny. Planowane są kolejne cykliczne spotkania.
EN
The need to discuss the problems and challenges facing contemporary library science inspired the organizing of Lublin meetings of bibliologists, information scientists, and librarians. The platform for the exchange of experiences and views between theorists and practitioners is the Forum organized by the Institute of Information and Library Science, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University in Lublin in collaboration with the leading libraries in the region. In 2015 two Forum editions were held: the first - on March 19, entitled “The Modern Library – the Modern Librarian”, the second – on 8 October, entitled “Modern Forms of Working in the Library – the Capabilities of Institutions vs. the Needs and Expectations of Users”. They were attended by over 200 participants representing libraries of different types (public, school, pedagogical, and scientific libraries), culture and information centers, and the community of book and library scholars from Lublin and the Lublin Region. Further cyclical meetings are planned.
PL
Wspomnienie o prof. Zofii Gacy-Dąbrowskiej. Bibliografia publikacji w wyborze.
EN
In memory of Professor Zofia Gaca-Dąbrowska (1927-2021). Bibliography of works of Prof. Zofia Gaca-Dąbrowska
EN
Professor Janusz Dunin-Horkawicz (b. 26 June 1931 in Vilna, d. 27 July 2007 in Łódź) was a humanist, university lecturer and social activist. His scholarly interests encompassed the theory and practice of social communication by means of the written word and iconic images; the history of literary, children’s and popular books; librarianship and bibliophilism. In his reflection on the world of printed matter, Dunin used several parallel discourses: bibliological, bibliophilic and media studiesdiscourse. In order to describe Dunin’s achievements, we would have to abandon the entire encyclopaedia- and dictionary-based conceptual framework we use to describe scholars. Descriptions like eminent literature scholar, popular culture scholar, media studies expert, bibliologist, bibliophile are applicable to some extent, but they do not describe all of Professor Dunin’s competencies, limiting the discussion about his role in the humanities today. As a scholar Dunin followed his own path in pursuit of learning; he had a unique gift for observing the world of books and literature, and his vast knowledge enabled him to move effortlessly across various research fields. Consequently, his conclusions were cross-disciplinary and were expressed in a light style combining scientific approach with popular appeal. According to the author of this article, Professor Dunin’s legacy deserves to be analysed in detail by contemporary scholars.
EN
The aim of the article is not only to point out at low quality of typography of contemporary scientific books published in Poland, but mainly to aware that it generates negative impact on communication value. In that context 400 books published in Poland by bibliologists in last 10 years were analyzed by authors of the article. The conclusions presented in the article were based on the analysis of the semantic quality of covers (semantic relations of text and image). The most typical and repetitive errors (e.g. neutrality, literalism and incompatibility) were shown and described. Last, but not least, it was proven by some of good examples, that working on and achieving the proper quality of com­munication in cover’s design is possible, despite the costs. The only way to success is to understand the real needs of users and design thinking in books’ design.
PL
W artykule omówiono wkład ukraińskiego księgoznawcy Leona Bykow-skiego (1895–1992) w rozwój polskiej nauki o bibliotekarstwie oraz pokazano jego zasługi w ratowaniu polskich zbiorów bibliotecznych podczas II wojny światowej. Szczególną uwagę poświęcono działalności bibliotecznej Bykowskiego w ekstremalnych warunkach powstania warszawskiego na przełomie lata i jesieni 1944 roku. Artykuł w dużej mierze jest napisany na podstawie wspomnień Bykowskiego, które były wydane po II wojnie świa-towej w Niemczech Zachodnich, Wielkiej Brytanii i USA. Podkreślone zostały szczególne dokonania dyrektora warszawskiej biblioteki w ocaleniu księgozbiorów znanych emigran-tów-Ukraińców oraz ukraińskich instytucji emigracyjnych, które w okresie powstania warszawskiego narażone były na zniszczenie.
EN
Leon Bykowski (1895–1992) was a Ukrainian bibliologist who in the interwar period found himself in Poland as a refugee from Ukraine occupied by the Bolsheviks. In the years 1928–1944 he worked at the Municipal Public Library of Warsaw, where he was responsible for completing the collections. During the German occupation, Bykowski was the director of this library. At that time, he was a lecturer at the Higher Courses in Library Studies andan he was also author of numerous scientific publications in the field of bibliology. The aim of the article is to present Bykowski’s role in the development of Polish librarianship science and to show his contribution to saving library collections during World War II. The article is written mostly the basis of Bykowski’s memoirs published after World War II in West Germany, Great Britain and the USA.
EN
Negative assessments of the pre-war book situation were used as justification for some of the changes in this field made in 1945-1956. The reference to a deliberately distorted picture of the book’s situation in the Second Polish Republic intensified during the most revolutionary changes in this respect, the essence of which was bureaucratic planning, etatization and control of the processes of its issuing, production, sale and distribution. The problem that requires further research is the answer to the question of how the arguments used in „blackening” the image of book affairs in the Second Polish Republic could be convincing for those to whom they were directed.
EN
This year’s conference was organised by the Inventory Team of the Cathedral Library in Gniezno, attached to the Institute of History at Adam Mickiewicz University, and by the Poznań branch of the Poznań Society of Friends of Arts. The seventeen conference papers presented in this reporting article cover a variety of the problems and issues raised during the conference, encompassing a number of diverse aspects of old and rare books; this year with a slightly higher proportion of papers on book production and binding techniques and tegumentology. The conference was highly appraised for its scientific aptitude, while much appreciation was given to the overall high level of presentations given by the participants and the sheer number of participants, though none of the them represented an academic centre that was strictly involved in research on the history and science of books as physical objects, representing different research centres in Poland and abroad (Kraków, Lublin, Mińsk, Poznań, Słupsk, Tel Awiw, Toruń and Warszawa). The conference was accompanied by an exhibition presenting the special collections of the library of the PSFA (prepared by Michał Bartoszak and Wojciech Graś) documenting the history of the expansion of the resources of this library in the contexts of the donations made by its most notable donators.
PL
Prezentowana konferencja zorganizowana została przez Zespół ds. Inwentaryzacji Biblioteki Katedralnej w Gnieźnie przy Instytucie Historii Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu oraz Poznańskie Towarzystwo Przyjaciół Nauk. W artykule sprawozdawczym zreferowano tematykę 17 wystąpień konferencyjnych (z zakresu różnorodnych aspektów książki dawnej; z umiarkowaną przewagą zagadnień tegumentologicznych). W podsumowaniu konferencję oceniono bardzo pozytywnie, doceniono bardzo równy i wysoki poziom wystąpień oraz sporą liczbę ośrodków naukowych (Kraków, Lublin, Mińsk, Poznań, Słupsk, Tel Awiw, Toruń, Warszawa) i prelegentów biorących udział w spotkaniu (choć żaden z referentów nie reprezentował instytutu stricte bibliologicznego). Konferencji towarzyszyła wystawa okolicznościowa prezentująca zbiory specjalne Biblioteki PTPN (oprac. Michał Bartoszak i Wojciech Graś), ukazująca, jak kształtował się zasób tej biblioteki przez pryzmat jej najznamienitszych donatorów. 
EN
The article was dedicated to professor Hanna Tadeusiewicz, a scientist from Lodz. Her scientific, didactical and organizational activities are connected with the University of Lodz. Her activities were focused on a particular field which was the workshop of the Dictionary of the Polish Book Labourers where she was a co-organizer and continuator. She also transferred her experience in biographical studies to Kalisz Society of Friends of Sciences. The article discusses the Professor's achievements in the field of biography studies. It puts a particular emphasis on the researcher's merits in the field of book studies.
PL
Artykuł dedykowany jest łódzkiej uczonej prof. Hannie Tadeusiewicz. Jej działalność naukowa, dydaktyczna i organizacyjna związana jest z Uniwersytetem Łódzkim. Działania Pani Profesor były skoncentrowane na organizacji i wieloletniej kontynuacji prac nad warsztatem Słownika pracowników książki polskiej. Swoje doświadczenia biografistyczne wykorzystała również w Kaliskim Towarzystwie Przyjaciół Nauk. Artykuł omawia osiągnięcia Pani Profesor w dziedzinie biografistyki. Kładzie szczególny nacisk na zasługi badaczki w dziedzinie bibliologii.
PL
Początki myśli bibliologicznej na Białorusi w związku z pojawieniem się i rozwojem tamtejszego piśmiennictwa. Kształtowanie się na Białorusi księgoznawstwa jako nauki od przełomu XVIII/XIX wieku. Ścisłe jego związki z bibliografią, historią i filologią oraz działalnością naukową uczonych polskich, rosyjskich i litewskich. Powstanie i rozwój właściwej białoruskiej nauki o książce w związku z kształtowaniem się tożsamości narodowej Białorusinów od 1918/1919 roku. Położenie podwalin pod rozwój podstawowych zasad teoretycznych i metodologicznych w badaniach nad kulturą książki. Powstanie instytucji publicznych zajmujących się problematyka bibliologiczną. Autonomia białoruskiej nauki o książce w stosunku do szkół księgoznawczych rosyjskiej, polskiej i ukraińskiej. Zintegrowany charakter problematyki kultury książki na Białorusi, włączenie problematyki badawczej i metodologii księgoznawstwa do innych dyscyplin naukowych (szczególnie historii i historii literatury). Współczesne czasopisma księgoznawcze i specjalistyczne księgoznawcze serie wydawnicze oraz ich rola w rozwoju białoruskiej nauki o książce.
EN
The aim of the article is to examine the origins, directions of development, methodological assumptions and research categories in Belarusian bibliology as an autonomous academic discipline. An analysis of the most important achievements of books studies in Belarus, the beginnings of which as a science go back to the turn of the nineteenth century, has enabled the author to formulate a number of research hypotheses. Of key importance to the development of Belarusian bibliology were historical studies — they laid the foundations for the modern book science theory, as it was only thanks to research into book history that it became possible to formulate the theory of books studies, the role and place of the book in scholarship, research methods and conceptual apparatus of the discipline. An important role in the development of the methodology of bibliological research in the second half of the twentieth century was played by the studies of the Polish scholar Krzysztof Migoń. A considerable role was also played by the methods developed for the needs of bibliography and library science. The origins and evolution of bibliology in Belarus were and are inextricably linked to the role of the book as a means of disseminating and recording the achievements of the human thought, to the traditions of society’s intellectual development, cultural identity of the Belarusian people as well as the general knowledge of book culture. Belarusian bibliology has some significant achievements to its credit, both in historical studies and in book theory and methodology of book studies. As a result, it is possible to speak of the Belarusian book studies school, which is characterised by: 1) the use of interdisciplinary research methodology as well as scholarly interaction with disciplines like philosophy, culture studies, bibliography studies and information studies; 2) development of axiological and phenomenological research; and 3) development of international collaboration in order to make the Belarusian book studies recognisable in international academia. A considerable role was and still is played by bibliological journals, which are a platform for presenting scholarly achievements in the discipline (they include Кнігазнаўчыя чытанні, Кірыла-Мяфодзіеўскія чытанні, Берковские чтения) as well as publication series devoted to the subject.
Pamiętnik Literacki
|
2020
|
vol. 111
|
issue 4
31-43
PL
Artykuł omawia problemy i możliwości współczesnej edycji naukowej. Ukształtowane w Polsce zasady opracowania tekstów nieżyjących autorów w ciągu XX wieku podlegały coraz ściślejszej normatywizacji. Toczone w Polsce dyskusje dotyczyły na ogół konkretnych rozwiązań, natomiast niezbyt często podejmowały zagadnienia teorii i krytyki tekstu, bardzo szeroko rozwijane i dyskutowane zarówno w literaturoznawstwie zachodnim, jak i rosyjskim. W efekcie sztywniejących zasad w ramach edycji nie mieszczą się istotne informacje o tekście i niemal zupełnie nie uwzględnia się problematyki procesu twórczego. Wiedza o przekształceniach konkretnego dzieła może poszerzyć możliwości jego interpretacji. Rozwiązaniem zagadnień podejmowanych w ramach krytyki tekstu, wbrew pierwotnym oczekiwaniom, nie będzie edycja cyfrowa, jeśli nie powstaną koncepcje cyfryzacji dostosowane do każdego dzieła oddzielnie.
EN
The article discusses the problems and possibilities of the contemporary academic edition. Editorial preparations of texts by late authors throughout the 20th century underwent more and more rigid normalisation. Discussions in Poland mainly referred to specific solutions, though they rather seldom raised the issues of text theory and criticism, broadly developed and examined both in Western and in Russian literary studies. In effect of the stiffening rules, the crucial pieces of information about the text failed to be included within an edition, and it almost completely neglected the text-forming issues. The knowledge about the transformations of a given work may extend its interpretive potential. Solution to the problems addressed within the framework of text criticism, against its initial assumptions, will not be worked out on the ground of text criticism unless concepts of digitisation designed to individual works separately are developed.
first rewind previous Page / 2 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.