Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  car Piotr (927-969)
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Car Piotr (927–969) w „Opowieści proroka Izajasza”. Kilka uwag

100%
Leszka M. J.
In Gremium. Studia nad Historią, Kulturą i Polityką
|
2019
|
vol. 13
131-139
PL
Opowieść proroka Izajasza jest zaliczana do nurtu literatury historyczno-apokaliptycznej. Powstała w epoce, w której ziemie bułgarskie były włączone w skład cesarstwa bizantyńskiego. Odnaleźć w niej możemy niezwykle ciekawy przekaz na temat Piotra. Anonimowy autor analizowanego utworu podkreśla fakt, że życie cara było bezgrzeszne i spędzone w czystości. Piotr stał na czele wybranego przez Boga ludu, podobnie jak cesarz bizantyński. Powiązanie jego osoby z Konstantynem I Wielkim/Konstantynem VII Porfirogenetą zrównuje go z władcami Konstantynopola. Tendencja ta znajduje również wyraz w stwierdzeniu, że Piotr był władcą Bułgarom i Grekom. Istotnym rysem wizerunku cara w Opowieści jest wskazanie, że za jego rządów Bułgaria przeżywała okres wyjątkowej szczęśliwości, zasobna we wszystkie potrzebne dobra. Piotr był więc dobrym, sprawiedliwym i silnym władcą.
EN
Tale of the Prophet Isaiah is classed among the historical-apocalyptic literature. It was written at the time when the Bulgarian lands were already a part of the Byzantine Empire. In it, we find an extraordinarily interesting passage regarding Peter. The anonymous author emphasises the fact that his was a sinless life, spent in purity. Peter led a people chosen by God, similarly to a Byzantine emperor. Associating him with Constantine the Great or Constantine Porphyrogennetos makes him equal to a Byzantine ruler. This is also expressed through the statement that he was a tsar of the Bulgarians and of the Greeks. A notable feature of this portrayal of Peter in the Tale is the indication that during this ruler’s reign Bulgaria was going through a period of a particular beatitude, and abounded in all the necessary goods. Peter therefore comes across as a good, just and strong ruler.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Rola cara Piotra (927-969) w życiu bułgarskiego Kościoła. Kilka uwag

84%
Leszka M. J.
Vox Patrum
|
2016
|
vol. 66
429-442
EN
Tsar Peter was a ruler who was active in the sphere of church policy, and is pictured to have been a deep believer himself. He is credited with the fact of granting the title of patriarch to the Bulgarian archbishop, which most probably occurred under the framework of the agreement of 927 (?933/934). The act sym­bolically completed the process of acquiring full maturity and independence by the Church of Bulgaria. Peter, as the first Bulgarian ruler, had to face a serious problem of heresy. Be­ing fully aware of responsibility for orthodoxy of his subjects’ creed, he was de­termined enough to take precautions in order to stifle the development of the Bo­gomil heresy. However, his actual actions (except for his consulting the patriarch) and their results are impossible to pinpoint. On the other hand, it should be stressed that, during the rule of tsar Peter, the Bulgarian monasticism lived through a period of considerable development. The tsar contributed to that progress, though, unfortunately, details of the phenomenon are impossible to determine. Peter himself became a monk before his death, and subsequently his personal worship evolved around his involvement in the monas­tic movement.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Car bułgarski Piotr (927-969) w bizantyńskiej historiografii X-XII wieku

84%
Leszka M.
Vox Patrum
|
2018
|
vol. 70
339-354
EN
Byzantine historians tied Peter primarily with the establishment of the las­ting peace with the Empire in 927. In the sources that present the events from before the reign of the emperor Nikephor Phokas (963-969), when the relations between both states deteriorated, Peter is commonly portrayed as a peacemaker, a deeply religious man, accepting of the Byzantine way of understanding the role of the ruler in religious matters. However, Byzantine authors point out that Peter was able to successfully secure his position and ruthlessly deal with his enemies. The sources describing the events from the last years of his reign portray him as a prideful person, daring to stand up against the Byzantine basileÚj, and who gets rightfully and severely punished for his actions. It should be noted that most often the Byzantine authors did not describe their attitude towards Peter, and did not judge him directly. This results in the reader having to build the image of the Bulgarian ruler himself, based on how the sources describe the events concerning his reign.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.