Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  chairman
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
After the end of World War II, the activities of the Polish Olympic Committee were reactivated. In the new political reality this institution was treated by the communists as a „remnant of the bourgeois sport structure” but it was deemed necessary as sport could be used for political propaganda of the system prevailing in the countries of the people’s democracy. Therefore, the Kremlin accepted an invitation to participate in the International Olympic Committee and, consequently, in the Olympic Movement. The membership of Poles in the IOC was an important element of this participation. Formally, the IOC was governed by the principle of „reverse” membership. IOC members were therefore representatives of organizations in the countries from which they came. However, in accordance with the assumptions of the communists, IOC members from Poland were expected to be trusted people of the people’s power, in order to shape the profile of the IOC together with their counterparts from other countries of people’s democracy. The communists made unsuccessful attempts to introduce such persons to the IOC several times. It was not possible until 1961 when Włodzimierz Reczek became a member of the IOC.
EN
The article deals with the repeated performances of the function of presidents and vice-presidents of courts, in line with the 2010 Czech Constitutional court decision which abolished the possibility of the one-time repetition of the performance of the function. Following the decision, a new amendment of the Act on courts and judges introduces a ban on repetition with several exemptions. The author points to historical developments of court officials’ repeated performance of a function, current state and the present amendment with its constitutional consequences.
CS
Článek se zabývá problematikou opakovaného výkonu funkce předsedy a místopředsedy soudů v souvislosti s judikaturou Ústavního soudu z roku 2010, která zrušila výslovnou možnost jednorázového opakovaného výkonu funkce, a novelou zákona o soudech a soudcích, jež výslovně zavádí omezení opakovaného výkonu s připuštěním určitých výjimek, a to právě s poukazem na deset let starý nález Ústavního soudu. Autor poukazuje na historický vývoj materie ustavování soudních funkcionářů, recentní stav, jakož i na právě přijatou novelu s posouzením její ústavní konformity.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.