Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  citation analysis
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Measuring the Use of Knowledge in Policy Development

100%
Witting A.
Central European Journal of Public Policy
|
2015
|
vol. 9
|
issue 2
54-62
EN
Public hearings are frequently used on all levels of government to systematically collect and analyze information in the early stages of legislative policymaking. The methods currently employed measure knowledge utilization in this context by means of citation analysis of edited articles and/or reports that summarize the information shared at these meetings. By combining citation analysis and social network analysis, this article develops a methodology that can be used to capture citations in transcripts of public hearings that precede these reports. In order to demonstrate its strengths and weaknesses, the method is utilized to analyze the 2009 hearings that informed the 2010 House of Commons Transport Committee report on developing the capacity of major roads in the United Kingdom to meet the country’s strategic transport needs. The research shows a good degree of consistency between two independent coders who employed this method to distinguish citations from non-citations and classify the data. It is concluded that the method can be utilized to reliably measure knowledge utilization at public hearings, and that it can be employed in conjunction with research that focuses on measuring citations in memos, briefings, articles or reports integrating some of the evidence given at these meetings.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Функции художественных цитат в публицистическом тексте

100%
Korzeniewska-Berczyńska J.
Acta Polono-Ruthenica
|
2008
|
vol. Tom 1 Nr XIII
415-426
EN
The author of this article analyses some poetic quotations which are grouped in the following way:1. Soviet poets, who in different extent of involvement, were apologists of the Soviet reality2. Classicists of the 19th century Russian poetry3. Soviet poets whose literary works were forbidden, or were treated disrespect-fully, or simply ignored, therefore these pieces of work circulated frequently in clandestine publishing and distribution. The analyse made by the author depicts that such way and context of citation was often used by many authors whose works played an instrumental role for temporary purposes. However, they did not always keep their minds on high artistic level of ana-lysed texts. Their citations were frequently applied to discriminate the seventy - year period of the Soviet ruling, particularly in the aspects of political and social life as well as to point out degeneration of perestroika and the so called Soviet „democracy”. However, one can recognize their substantial, expressive and cognitive function.
3
Content available remote

Recepční studie českého vydání Auerovy Jazykové interakce:

75%
Tůma F.
Slovo a slovesnost: časopis pro otázky teorie a kultury jazyka (Slovo a slovesnost: A journal for the theory of language and language cultivation)
|
2020
|
vol. 81
|
issue 4
283-305
EN
In 2014 a book by Peter Auer was published, presenting major theoretical approaches to the analysis of linguistic interaction. This book, which is a Czech translation and adaptation of the German original, was quickly sold out and now, five years later, it seems vital to ask how the book has been accepted. This reception study therefore analyzes 9 book reviews as well as 24 citing articles and 41 citing theses (a total of 171 citations). The analysis shows that the book has been cited by authors from the fields of linguistics, sociology and education as well as by authors affiliated with interdisciplinary departments. It also reveals that some of the most cited chapters are those whose Czech translations are not yet available (namely works by Sacks, Garfinkel, Schütz and Gumperz). The findings also uncover how the strengths of the book are reflected in the book reviews, citing texts and citations – the citing authors and reviewers appreciate the biographic sections, the inclusion of authors whose works are not yet available in Czech, the terminological clarity, as well as the complex and interdisciplinary nature of the book.
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Analysis of citations and co-citations of the term ‘word of mouth’ based on publications in the field of social sciences

75%
Błoński K.
Marketing Instytucji Naukowych i Badawczych
|
2023
|
vol. 48
|
issue 2
111-133
EN
Word of mouth' (WOM) as a communication tool has evolved quite significantly over the last few decades. Originally, word-of-mouth communication was limited to local coverage, i.e. it was restricted only to the closest people in the circle of the sender of the message. Technological developments over the past 30 years, particularly in computer and mobile technologies, have brought about significant changes in this form of communication. The information provided has become global; the consumer can communicate directly with the entrepreneur. Examples of bibliographic analyses of only electronic word of mouth (eWOM) without consideration of traditional WOM can be found in the literature. It therefore seems important to try to analyse the literature collection on both WOM and eWOM. The article aims to identify and present the most frequently cited works (along with their authors), as well as the publications most frequently referred to by authors publishing works related to WOM. Citation analysis and co-citation analysis were used to realise the stated aim. The basis for the analyses is a collection of publications from the WoS database. The results obtained made it possible to identify and create a list of the most frequently cited and co-cited publications.
5
Content available remote

Sběrné odkazy k judikatuře a využití citační analýzy ke zvýšení transparentnosti rozhodování

63%
Stachoňová M., Harašta J.
Právník. Teoretický časopis pro otázky státu a práva (The Lawyer - Scientific Review for Problems of State and Law)
|
2017
|
vol. 156
|
issue 7
619-634
EN
The term of jurisprudence constante is commonly used throughout the Czech jurisprudence. Despite that, the term itself has never been clearly defined. Therefore it is not evident which particular decisions are cited by the court. It is also nearly unverifiable if the case law cited in the court decision really addresses the same problem.Moreover, the misleading use of the term constant jurisprudence can cause the expansion of inadequately reasoned opinion to the practice of other courts. This is the reason why this article discusses the problems connected to the constant jurisprudence and suggests a solution to the problem of how to contribute to the clarification of the case law. The aim is to use a citation analysis tool which would raise the transparency and set clear rules to the field of constant jurisprudence. The paper thus presents both theoretical and practical methodological considerations relating to the citation analysis, leading to a practical implementation in the future.
CS
Pojmy konstantní či ustálená judikatura jsou běžně užívány v české rozhodovací praxi. Navzdory tomu to neznamená, že by byly jasně a jednoznačně definovány. Při jejich užití tedy často není zřejmé, na která konkrétní rozhodnutí soud odkazuje. Je mnohdy téměř nemožné ověřit, zda se citovaná rozhodnutí skutečně věnují stejnému problému jako soudní rozhodnutí, které se na ně odkazuje. Nejednoznačné užívání pojmu konstantní judikatury tak může mít za následek rozšíření nedostatečně odůvodněného názoru do praxe jiných soudů. Proto se článek zaměřuje na problémy s tímto pojmem spojené a navrhuje řešení, jak přispět ke zpřehlednění judikatury. Cílem je zvýšit transparentnost používaných sběrných termínů využitím právně-informatického nástroje - citační analýzy. Článek proto představuje vybrané teoretické i praktické metodologické úvahy týkající se citační analýzy, směřující k budoucí praktické aplikaci.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Drapieżne czasopisma są legitymizowane przez artykuły w czasopismach z impact factor

63%
Kulczycki E., Hołowiecki M., Taşkın Z., Krawczyk F.
Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
|
2021
|
vol. 83
|
issue 2
59-82
EN
One of the most fundamental issues in academia today is understanding the differences between legitimate and predatory publishing. While decision-makers and managers consider journals indexed in popular citation indexes such as Web of Science or Scopus as legitimate, they use two blacklists (Beall’s and Cabell’s), one of which has not been updated for a few years, to identify predatory journals. The main aim of our study is to reveal the contribution of the journals accepted as legitimate by the authorities to the visibility of blacklisted journals. For this purpose, 65 blacklisted journals in social sciences and 2,338 Web-of-Science-indexed journals that cited these blacklisted journals were examined in-depth, in terms of index coverages, subject categories, impact factors and self-citation patterns. We have analysed 3,234 unique cited papers  from blacklisted journals and 5,964 unique citing papers (6,750 citations of cited papers) from Web of Science journals. We found that 13% of the blacklisted papers were cited by WoS journals and 37% of the citations were from impact-factor journals. As a result, although the impact factor is used by decision-makers to determine the levels of the journals, it is demonstrated that there is no significant relationship between the impact factor and the number of citations to blacklisted journals.
PL
Jednym z problemów współczesnego środowiska akademickiego jest zrozumienie różnic pomiędzy uznanymi czasopismami naukowymi a tzw. czasopismami drapieżnymi. Podczas gdy osoby kształtujące politykę naukową i menedżerowie nauki uważają czasopisma indeksowane w popularnych indeksach cytowań, takich jak Web of Science czy Scopus, za rzetelne, to do identyfikacji drapieżnych czasopism używają dwóch czarnych list (tzw. lista Bealla i lista Cabell’s), z których jedna nie jest aktualizowana od kilku lat. Głównym celem naszego artykułu jest pokazanie, jak czasopisma uznane za rzetelne podnoszą widoczność artykułów opublikowanych w czasopismach znajdujących się na czarnych listach. W tym celu przebadaliśmy 65 czasopism z nauk społecznych znajdujących się na czarnych listach oraz 2338 czasopism indeksowanych przez Web of Science, które cytowały te czasopisma. Przeanalizowaliśmy 3234 artykuły z czasopism znajdujących się na czarnych listach oraz 5964 artykuły (6750 cytowań) z czasopism indeksowanych w Web of Science. Nasze wyniki pokazują, że 13% artykułów z czarnych list było cytowanych przez czasopisma z Web of Science, a 37% cytowań pochodziło z czasopism z impact factor. Okazuje się, że nie ma istotnej zależności między impact factor a liczbą cytowań w czasopismach z czarnej listy, mimo że jest on jest wykorzystywany przez osoby kształtujące politykę naukową do określania poziomu czasopism. Z drugiej strony należy wziąć pod uwagę jako czynnik wyjaśniający kraj i praktyki autocytowania stosowane w czasopismach.
7
Content available remote

Wartość parametryczna czasopism naukowych a codzienna praktyka badawcza. Casus polskiej humanistyki pierwszej dekady XXI w.

63%
Nowak P.
Toruńskie Studia Bibliologiczne
|
2014
|
vol. 7
|
issue 2(13)
99-116
PL
W artykule zakłada się, że wysoka wartość merytoryczna czasopisma faktycznie staje się nią dopiero wówczas, gdy artykuły w nim publikowane tworzą klaster dokumentów, oparty na współcytowaniach, z artykułami publikowanymi w czasopismach o wysokiej wartości. Dopiero wówczas czasopismo staje się nośnikiem paradygmatu badawczego danej dyscypliny. Przeprowadzona pod tym kątem analiza systemu cytowań w wybranym obszarze polskiego humanistycznego czasopiśmiennictwa naukowego tej tezy jednak nie potwierdza. Rozkład wartości parametrycznej cytowanych czasopism jest przypadkowy, z wyraźną przewagą czasopism nieposiadających impact factor. W analizie prezentowanej na łamach artykułu wykorzystano badania przeprowadzone na podstawie dziesięciu czołowych polskich czasopism filologicznych. Zakres chronologiczny analizy ograniczony został do lat 2000–2009.
EN
The article assumes that the high value of a journal becomes a fact only when its articles form a cluster of documents based on citations by other journals of high value. Only then does the journal become a carrier of the research paradigm in its discipline. However, a citation analysis of selected Polish humanities periodicals does not confirm this assumption. Distribution of parametric value of the journals is random, with a clear predominance of non-impact factor journals. The analysis presents results of a study conducted on ten leading Polish philological journals. The chronological scope of the analysis was limited to years 2000−2009.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.