Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  coalition governments
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In relation to the systemic transformation, which began in Poland in 1989, there was a need to define a new political regime. Eventually it was decided to settle upon a system of government which is characterised by the duality of executive power exercised by the President, as well as Prime Minister and the government accountable to parliament. This element of the political regime creates the potential for cohabitation – an inher-ently conflictual phenomena which can have many negative consequences. One of them is the possibility of its negative impact on the duration of the coalition cabinet. In this article, we intend to test the hypothesis, according to which the phenomenon of cohabitation has a negative impact on coalition governments through the reduc-tion of their duration. The aticle consists of four parts. The first briefly characterizes the evolution of the Polish political regime, highlighting the potential for cohabita-tion which is created by the dual structure of executive – the permanent element of Polish system of government. In the second part we explain the concepts of the cabinet government and the coalition. In the third section we describe coalition gov-ernments formed in Poland in the years 1991–2014 and the phenomenon of cohabitation occurring during their lifetime. In the fourth part we examine the impact of cohabitation on the duration of coalition governments in Poland. The conclusions of the analysis are presented at the end.
EN
A meeting point for scholars working on the processes of formation of coalition governments in European parliamentary systems is the analysis of the Spanish case. Since the restoration of democracy in the late 1970s parliamentary minority has not come to form any coalition government. Instead of it there have been parliamentary negotiation processes, in which stable parliamentary agreements have been reached to ensure continuous support for the government in office. One point worth noting is that, in these negotiations, the main national parties – UCD, PSOE or PP – have chosen to negotiate only with nationalist parties or non-state-wide parties. This article attempts, in the light of spatial analysis, to provide new arguments for understanding such negotiation processes.
EN
The end of the Second World War along with the total defeat of Germany and its satellites brought a new ordering of Europe, where the countries of Central and Southeast Europe, without regard for whether they belonged among the victors or the vanquished, fell into the sphere of the Soviet Union’s influence. In significant ways, this new geopolitical situation influenced the radical social and political changes that were taking place in these countries, as well as their internal and foreign policies. Along with their northern, southern and eastern neighbors, Hungary also became part of the Soviet’s sphere of interest. The implementation of the process of Sovietization manifested within the internal politics of Hungary was manifested through a gradual constriction of political alternatives from limiting pluralism all the way to establishing a Stalinist dictatorship.
EN
A meeting point for scholars working on the processes of formation of coalition governments in European parliamentary systems is the analysis of the Spanish case. Since the restoration of democracy in the late 1970s parliamentary minority has not come to form any coalition government. Instead of it there have been parliamentary negotiation processes, in which stable parliamentary agreements have been reached to ensure continuous support for the government in office. One point worth noting is that, in these negotiations, the main national parties – UCD, PSOE or PP – have chosen to negotiate only with nationalist parties or non-state-wide parties. This article attempts, in the light of spatial analysis, to provide new arguments for understanding such negotiation processes.
PL
Badacze zajmujący się procesami formowania koalicji rządowych w europejskich systemach parlamentarnych często analizują przypadek Hiszpanii. Od przywrócenia demokracji pod koniec lat 70. XX wieku mniejszość parlamentarna nigdy nie sformowała rządu. Wyłanianiu stabilnego rządu służyły zatem procesy negocjacji w parlamencie, w których formowały się trwałe porozumienia koalicyjne. Istotną cechą tych negocjacji było to, że główne partie ogólnokrajowe rozmawiały jedynie z partiami regionalnymi. Niniejszy artykuł stara się dostarczyć, za pomocą analizy przestrzennej, nowych argumentów służących zrozumieniu tych procesów negocjacyjnych.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.