Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 9

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  confraternity
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Authority and function of the head of guild and custom communicative in the light of Cracow’s brewers protocols (from the years 1729-1760) This article presents the concept of authority exploited in historical studies of language. It shows a clash between the authority of the head of a corporation and the language custom of a speech community fixed in guild protocols. The influence of the older guild is reflected in the choice of the writer, in giving orders to write down contents of extreme relevance as well as in the theme of unusual records. The stylistic, linguistic and genre shape of records depend on the writer, who adapts it to the existing patterns of text. The relationship between the writer and the head of a guild sometimes manifests itself in the records of panegyric character. The situation changes when former writers become the head of guild, which will be discussed in the next publication.
EN
In this article, the authors present an edition of preserved and to date unpublished documents demonstrating the origin of confraternities between Convents of Canons Regular in Żagań and in Kłodzko. The documents were issued on 5 and 19 March 1401.
PL
Sobór Watykański II był największym wydarzeniem, jakie Kościół katolicki przeżył od czasu soboru trydenckiego. Jego recepcja dokonywała się niejednokrotnie w klimacie polemik, nawet kontestacji. Uosobieniem takiej postawy był abp Marceli Lefebvre. Jego Bractwo Kapłańskie św. Piusa X opowiedziało się przeciw soborowi, zwłaszcza odnowie liturgicznej. Sobór ukazał liturgię jako źródło i szczyt życia Kościoła. Jej celebransem jest wspólnota Kościoła. Jej członkowie, jako lud kapłański, według uzdolnień wynikających z sakramentu chrztu i sakramentu święceń, spełniają prawdziwe funkcje liturgiczne dla sakramentalnego uobecnienia misterium paschalnego Chrystusa. Przeciwnicy odnowy soborowej dokonali swoistej „kanonizacji” liturgii trydenckiej, uważając ją za Mszę Wszechczasów i jedyny sposób zabezpieczenia wiary katolickiej. Kolejni papieże, począwszy od Pawła VI do Franciszka, podejmowali dialog z Bractwem. Swymi dokumentami normowali sposób celebrowania Eucharystii wg mszału Jana XXIII z 1962 roku. Ten sposób określili jako nadzwyczajną formę rytu rzymskiego. Problem jedności kościelnej Bractwa jest ciągle otwarty.
EN
The Second Vatican Council was the greatest event the Catholic Church had experienced since the Council of Trent. Its reception was often carried out in a climate of polemics even contestation. The epitome of such an attitude was Archbishop Marceli Lefebvre. His Confraternity of St Pius X spoke out against the Council, especially the liturgical renewal. The Council portrayed the liturgy as the source and summit of the life of the Church. Its celebrant is the community of the Church. Its members, as a priestly people, according to their giftedness deriving from the sacrament of baptism and the sacrament of Holy Orders, perform the true liturgical functions for the sacramental making present of Christ's paschal mystery. Opponents of the conciliar renewal made a kind of 'canonisation' of the Tridentine liturgy, considering it to be the Mass of all time and the only way to safeguard the Catholic faith. Successive popes, from Paul VI to Francis, entered into dialogue with the Confraternity. With their documents, they standardised the manner of celebrating the Eucharist according to the 1962 Missal of John XXIII. They defined this manner as an extraordinary form of the Roman rite. The problem of the Brotherhood's co-worship unity is still open.
EN
In 1801 on the initiative of Andrzej Pesaliński, a parish priest in Juncewo, clergy philadelphia was organized in fi ve deaneries: Gniezno (Sts. Peter and Paul), Żnin, Łekno, Kcynia and Rogów. It was the successor of the earlier confraternities, established in 1743 and including three deaneries: Gniezno (Sts. Peter and Paul), Żnin and Łekno. The basic objectives of the renewed association was to encourage confreres in systematic religious practices, mutual concern and care during illness, and after the death of each of the brothers to celebrate as many Masses as specifi ed by the statute. In addition, each member received a copy of a philadelphia book titled: The inseparable association of fi ve deaneries: Sts. Apostles Peter and Paul Gniezno, Żnin, Łekno, Kcynia and Rogów or close philadelphia of these deaneries(…). Apart from the devotional texts, the book included the list of all members – clergy and laity who resided in the deaneries mentioned in the title. This publication constitutes an important source of information about families of Greater Poland and Pałuki (not only the noble ones), their social position and religious commitment.
PL
Klasztory kanoników regularnych św. Augustyna podlegały jurysdykcji biskupów diecezjalnych; w zakonie nie było więzi na poziomie kościelno-administracyjnym czy też władzy centralnej. Brak formalnych więzi prawnych zastępowały do pewnego stopnia więzi łączące poszczególne konfraternie, poprzez które kanonie tworzyły liturgiczno-modlitewną wspólnotę. Autor przedstawia niepublikowany wcześniej dokument prepozyta i klasztoru kanoników regularnych św. Augustyna w Prościejowie z dnia 29 XI 1403 r. adresowany do klasztoru NMP we Wrocławiu. Przechowywany w Archiwum Państwowym we Wrocławiu dokument nie różni się od innych dokumentów, które powstały w rudnickim kręgu klasztorów kanoników regularnych św. Augustyna; wykazuje on tekstowe podobieństwo do większości pozostałych dokumentów.
EN
Monasteries of the Canons Regular of St. Augustine were subordinated to the jurisdiction of diocesan bishops; there were no bonds on an ecclesiastical-administrative level and central control of the order was absent. The absent formal legal bonds were replaced to some extent with confraternal bonds, through which canonries formed a liturgical and prayer community. The author presents an unpublished document by the provost and monastery of Canons Regular of St. Augustine in Prostějov dated 29 November 1403 and addressed to St. Mary’s Monastery in Wrocław. The document, kept in the State Archives in Wrocław, does not differ from other documents written in the Roudnice circle of monasteries of Canons Regular of St. Augustine; it bears a textual similarity to most of the other documents.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.