Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  construction supervision
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dopuszczalność udziału posła, w ramach interwencji poselskiej, w kontroli prowadzonej przez powiatowy inspektorat nadzoru budowlanego

100%
Chybalski P.
Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS
|
2018
|
issue 4(60)
186-189
EN
The institution of intervention was constructed in the Act on the Exercise of the Exercise of a Mandate of a Deputy or Senator in a relatively inaccurate way. The author of the opinion states that in the analyzed situation a Deputy is not entitled to participate in the inspection carried out by the County’s Inspectorate of Construction Supervision. The only legal requirements concerning the intervention concern informing the Deputy about the state of consideration the case, being the subject of the intervention, and defining the date of “the final consideration of the case”.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Bezsilność nadzoru budowlanego – konieczne nowe rozwiązania systemowe

88%
Brzozowski H.
Kontrola Państwowa
|
2020
|
vol. 65
|
issue 1 (390)
83-93
EN
The audit, conducted all around the country, coordinated by the Regional Branch of the Supreme Audit Office in Kraków, was aimed to examine whether the control activities of construction inspectorates (at the regional and local level) were appro-priate and whether they effectively conducted execution proceedings. The auditors examined, among other, whether the organisation and resources of the inspectorates allowed for performance of tasks stipulated in the Construction Law, as well as whe-ther control proceedings were started immediately after information about irregula-rities was delivered.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Glosa do uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 3 listopada 2016 r. (II OPS 1/16, LEX nr 2116795)

63%
Zwolak S.
Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio G (Ius)
|
2019
|
vol. 66
|
issue 2
EN
Gloss concerns the resolution of the Supreme Administrative Court of 3 November 2016 (II OPS 1/16, LEX No. 2116795) which refers to the application of building regulations, applicable to construction works and buildings objects the implementation of which is not subject to legal regulation. According to the view expressed by the Supreme Administrative Court, the competent organ may order the abandonment of such construction works, order the demolition of a building or part thereof, or order it to its previous state or impose the obligation to perform construction works or works in a given period in order to carry out construction works to comply with the law.
PL
Glosa dotyczy uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 3 listopada 2016 r. (II OPS 1/16, LEX nr 2116795), która odnosi się do stosowania przepisów prawa budowlanego mających zastosowanie do robót budowlanych i obiektów budowlanych, których realizacja nie jest objęta prawną reglamentacją. Zgodnie z poglądem wyrażonym przez Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny właściwy organ może nakazać zaniechanie takich robót budowlanych, rozbiórkę obiektu budowlanego lub jego części bądź doprowadzenie go do stanu poprzedniego albo może nałożyć obowiązek wykonania w określonym terminie czynności lub robót budowlanych w celu doprowadzenia wykonywanych robót budowlanych do stanu zgodnego z prawem.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.