Search results

1

Podvod jako vážný problém světové vědy i aktuální české historiografie – poznámka k článku Jiřího Peška z ČČH 112, 2014, s. 497–511

100%

Volná K.

Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)

|

2015

|

vol. 113

|

issue 1

145-146

EN

The reaction to the paper of Jiří Pešek denies author’s assessment of the publication “JAREŠ, SPURNÝ, VOLNÁ: Náměstí Krasnoarmějců 2: Teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts of the Charles University in the period of normalization (1969-1989), Praha 2012” as methodologically incorrect and spinning the oral testimonies herein cited. His relegation of thepublication among the cases of evident scientific frauds by three sentences in a footnote only and without any detailed arguments appears to be unfair and malevolent.

2

HISTORYK WE WSPÓŁCZESNYM ŚWIECIE. KILKA UWAG WOKÓŁ TEKSTU JANA POMORSKIEGO Polityzacja/mitologizacja historii, czyli w czym neuronauka (i metodologia) może pomóc badaczowi historii najnowszej?

88%

STOBIECKI R.

Historia@Teoria

|

2017

|

vol. 4

|

issue 6

65-71

EN

Regarding how the present historians get involved in the debate on the politicization of the contemporary history, we can observe a superannuation of two models of historian: as a „cool scientist” and an „upholder of national values”. Apparently we could postulate in this moment the model of a historian as “a translator and mediator” between cultures, recognizing their “grammars”, and his obligation to create the common social capital. Nevertheless the scientifi c refl ection upon the politicization of history and the methodology of contemporary historiography is the matt er in dispute. Th erefore Pomorski’s suggestion of the more complex cognitive approach in the historiographical research (and historical discourse) should be taken into consideration.

PL

Regarding how the present historians get involved in the debate on the politicization of the contemporary history, we can observe a superannuation of two models of historian: as a „cool scientist” and an „upholder of national values”. Apparently we could postulate in this moment the model of a historian as “a translator and mediator” between cultures, recognizing their “grammars”, and his obligation to create the common social capital. Nevertheless the scientifi c refl ection upon the politicization of history and the methodology of contemporary historiography is the matt er in dispute. Th erefore Pomorski’s suggestion of the more complex cognitive approach in the historiographical research (and historical discourse) should be taken into consideration.

3

Polské spory o dějiny 20. století

63%

Majewski P. M., Miller S.

Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)

|

2022

|

vol. 120

|

issue 1

157-175

EN

The article deals with major conflicts over competing interpretations of contemporary history which took place in Poland after 1989. It frames this subject in a chain of historical debates concerning among others the Second World War, attitudes of Polish society vis-à-vis extermination of Jewish population during the Holocaust and post-War resistance against the Communist regime. It describes attempts of the Polish political right to impose a nationalistic narrative in the sphere of public history and examines political meaning of several state-run projects (Museum of the Second World War in Gdańsk, Museum of Polish Jews’ History in Warsaw, European Solidarity Centre in Gdańsk, Museum of Poles Saving Jews in World War II in Markowa).

Refine search results

2 Český časopis historický (The Czech Historical Review)

1 Historia@Teoria

1 2022

1 2017

1 2015

1 Majewski P. M.

1 Miller S.

1 STOBIECKI R.

1 Volná K.

Podvod jako vážný problém světové vědy i aktuální české historiografie – poznámka k článku Jiřího Peška z ČČH 112, 2014, s. 497–511

HISTORYK WE WSPÓŁCZESNYM ŚWIECIE. KILKA UWAG WOKÓŁ TEKSTU JANA POMORSKIEGO Polityzacja/mitologizacja historii, czyli w czym neuronauka (i metodologia) może pomóc badaczowi historii najnowszej?

Polské spory o dějiny 20. století