Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  critical review
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Recenzja książki: Aude Doody, ‘PLINY’S ENCYCLOPEDIA. THE RECEPTIN OF THE NATURAL HISTORY’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2010

100%
Koźluk M.
Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae
|
2011
|
vol. 21
|
issue 1
119-123
EN
This is a critical review of Aude Doody
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Polska powieść polityczna u progu XXI wieku. O prozie Bronisława Wildsteina

63%
Kania K.
Tematy i Konteksty
|
2015
|
issue 5(10)
67-84
EN
The demand that the public sphere, including culture, should be depoliticized after the transformations which took place in 1989 has proved to be baseless. Polish writers were challenged with the task of describing the events from Polish history and the political, social, cultural and economic changes that were taking place. Literature made an attempt to review the previous system and this issue seemed to be interesting for writers with both conservative and leftist views. One of the authors who delve into this kind of political novel is Bronisław Wildstein, whose artistic work has been imbued with political disputes in which he speaks out forcefully. It is not a cliché to call the novels of this writer and columnist fictionalized political manifestos. Wildstein unwaveringly raises the issues of history and politics as the things which determine our lives. Simultaneously, he refers to the tradition of prose analyzing the responsibility for public events. The writer tries to critically review the Polish People’s Republic (PRL) and its myths (including the Solidarity myth). Moreover, among the subjects frequently discussed one may find media policy and the world of politics from the inside.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Sprostowanie niektórych tłumaczeń z tureckiego ws. Nowy przekład dziejopisów tureckich Ignacego Pietraszewskiego – pomiędzy recenzją a translacją

63%
Klimek-Grądzka J.
Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Linguistica
|
2018
|
issue 13
32-41
EN
Subject to analysis in this article is the genre status of Ignacy Pietraszewski’s works commenting upon Collectanea by Józef Sękowski. The former work by Pietraszewski is a press edition of Sprostowania niektórych tłumaczeń z tureckiego [Corrections of Some Translations from Turkish] (1845), while the latter is an expanded, book edition of Corrections…, entitled Nowy przekład dziejopisów tureckich [A New Translation of Turkish History Writers] (1846). A research question asked in the article is to what extent Pietraszewski’s comments on Sękowski oeuvre is a case of translation or a case of translation criticism. Drawing upon the stylistic features of both works by Pietraszewski, their evaluative and judgmental lexis and their dialogical nature, the author decided that these works are critical reviews of Sękowski’s Collectanea. The reviews display an ostesibly marked polemical aspect. They contain evaluation of the target text and they mark a breach of the text-type canon by incorporating a didactic component.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.