Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  current research
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Budowniczy złotych mostów. Leśmian i retoryczna krytyka metafor by Kinga Dobrowolska is an example of a new comeback to Leśmian, which started about 10 years ago. The book uses the rhetorical criticism to have a new look on Bolesław Leśmian’s poetry. Although the composition of the work may be unsettled, it contains some interesting analyses of several poems.
PL
W chwili obecnej globalnie toczy się dyskusja na temat pożądanych i koniecznych zmian w konstytucji, wspólnych i niederogowalnych wartości demokratycznych, zakresu omnipotencji władz wyłonionych w drodze wolnych wyborów. W dyskusji tej uczestniczą politycy, przedstawiciele organizacji reprezentujących społeczeństwo obywatelskie, eksperci i przedstawiciele świata nauki. Polski dyskurs konstytucyjny po 2015 r. zdominowały konsekwencje bezpardonowego obchodzenia przez polityków sprawujących rządy postanowień ustawy zasadniczej. Jak się wydaje w Polsce dopiero zmiany polityczne, tj. zmiana partii politycznej odpowiedzialnej za kształtowanie polityki wewnętrznej i zewnętrznej państwa otworzy możliwość powrotu do funkcjonowania państwa w sposób zgodny z uznanymi standardami konstytucyjnymi i demokratycznymi, co wymagać będzie wdrożenia procedur naprawczych. Nawet w tych okolicznościach nie można jednak tracić z pola widzenia innych zagadnień, które obecnie stanowią przedmiot debaty na międzynarodowych forach konstytucjonalistów. Jak się wydaje – przynajmniej niektóre z nich – mogą okazać się przydatne w dyskusji nad przywracaniem standardów konstytucyjnych.
EN
At present, there is a global discussion on desirable and necessary changes to the constitution, common and non-derogable democratic values, and the scope of the omnipotence of the authorities elected in free elections. Politicians, representatives of organizations representing civil society, experts and representatives of the world of science participate in this discussion. The Polish constitutional discourse after 2015 was dominated by the consequences of ruthless circumvention of the provisions of the constitution by politicians in power. Even in these circumstances, however, other issues that are currently being debated in international constitutional forums must not be lost sight of. It seems that at least some of them may prove useful in the discussion on restoring constitutional standards.
EN
The article is a brief survey and evaluation of historical research on Poznań 1956 protests, the political change in October 1956, and the year in general. An important gap was filled by the publication of Piotr Grzelczak’s book on the long-term consequences of the Poznań protests, and the conflict over its remembrance between government representatives and local inhabitants of the region, since the protests were one of the defining moments in recent history of Poznań. The article also includes a summary of the controversy between historians over the importance of 1956 as a watershed in Polish history, with some historians arguing that a more liberal image of the communist system in Poland was formed in 1956, while others argued that the communist dictatorship was stabilized by winning wider social support. The author has indicated an increasing separation between narratives about the Poznań protests in June and the political transformations in October, which has consequences and threats related to polarized perception of history, leading to meagre and simplified understanding of social realities of the Polish People’s Republic after 1956.
PL
The article is a brief survey and evaluation of historical research on Poznań 1956 protests, the political change in October 1956, and the year in general. An important gap was filled by the publication of Piotr Grzelczak’s book on the long-term consequences of the Poznań protests, and the conflict over its remembrance between government representatives and local inhabitants of the region, since the protests were one of the defining moments in recent history of Poznań. The article also includes a summary of the controversy between historians over the importance of 1956 as a watershed in Polish history, with some historians arguing that a more liberal image of the communist system in Poland was formed in 1956, while others argued that the communist dictatorship was stabilized by winning wider social support. The author has indicated an increasing separation between narratives about the Poznań protests in June and the political transformations in October, which has consequences and threats related to polarized perception of history, leading to meagre and simplified understanding of social realities of the Polish People’s Republic after 1956.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.