Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  curriculum autonomy
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

МОЖЛИВОСТІ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ДОСВІДУ НІДЕРЛАНДІВ ДЛЯ МОДЕРНІЗАЦІЇ СИСТЕМИ УПРАВЛІННЯ ДЕРЖАВНИМИ ШКОЛАМИ В УКРАЇНІ

100%
Бойченко К.
Педагогічні науки: теорія, історія, інноваційні технології
|
2015
|
issue 3(47)
66-75
EN
The article deals with the comparative analysis of the Dutch and Ukrainian processes in educational management system in order to define the best practices and recommendations for modernization of Ukrainian school management. The system of education in Ukraine lacks for change; it requires a new way of thinking and behaving. The author analyzes such notions as «change», «innovation», «educational change», «modernization of education». The author offers the following definition of modernization of school management, which lies in transition from the old forms and methods of management to new, contemporary and innovative ones; dynamic, controlled and qualitative improvement in educational management. It is stated that high quality results of the Dutch education are reached mainly because of the long history of decentralized model in educational management together with a lot of freedom and autonomy given to schools. Under the article 23 of the Dutch Constitution it is mentioned that the key feature of education in the Netherlands is freedom: 1) to found schools and determine school philosophy (administrative autonomy); 2) to organize the teaching process and determine the principles of education (curriculum autonomy); 3) to administer funds (financial autonomy). The article shows another peculiar feature of the Dutch education system, which is decentralization that has been clearly felt over the last twenty years. This tendency is regarded to be positive, because it facilitates democratic approach to distribution of administrative functions from the central government to local authorities, from local authorities to directors who know best what their school needs. At the same time attention is paid to school funding and parental involvement in decision-making. Unlike in Ukraine, the educational management in the Netherlands is more democratic; the system of education is more open to the participation of society in educational decision-making. The article highlights the main problems and weaknesses of the Ukrainian educational management system processes such as: corruption in the educational system, the inappropriate usage of financial and material resources; centralisation, a lack of school autonomy which results in an overload of bureaucracy and excess of control; the lack of democracy, social accountability, readiness for innovations in education and school independence in choosing programs, curricula and books; insufficient parental participation, community involvement in school management. The solutions to these problems, possibilities to use the best examples of educational management experience of the Netherlands in order to improve the Ukrainian system of educational management are offered.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Wolność nauczania a autonomia edukacji akademickiej zgodnie z ustawą 2.0

84%
Chorążewska A.
Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego
|
2023
|
issue 1(71)
187-199
PL
Artykuł został poświęcony zagadnieniu autonomii edukacji akademickiej. Do rozważenia tytułowego zagadnienia prowadzi analiza uwarunkowań faktycznych i prawnych przyjęcia tzw. Konstytucji dla Nauki oraz praktyki wykładni i stosowania jej w zakresie prowadzenia studiów. W ten sposób celem pracy staje się ustalenie, czy reguły prawne tworzenia programów studiów obowiązujące od roku akademickiego 2019/2020 zapewniają uczelniom wyższym w tym zakresie niezbędną autonomię instytucjonalną oraz gwarantującą wolność nauczania. W konkluzjach pracy stwierdza się, że przyjęta regulacja w odpowiedni sposób realizuje autonomię programową uczelni wyższej. Przeprowadzone analizy wykazują, że przyjęte rozwiązania odpowiednio równoważą wymóg ochrony interesu publicznego z potrzebą reagowania na potrzeby partnerów społeczno-gospodarczych uczelni wyższych. W ten sposób równoważy się jakość kształcenia względem konieczności wprowadzania do programów studiów nowych treści programowych, odpowiadających na wyzwania stawiane współcześnie absolwentom uczelni wyższych.
EN
The issue of work is the autonomy of academic education. Analyzing the factual and legal conditions for adopting the so-called Constitution for Science and applying Act 2.0. in the field of conducting studies leads to considering the presented issue. In this way, the work aims to determine whether legal rules of creating studies curricula, in force since the 2019/2020 academic year, provide universities with the necessary institutional autonomy and guarantee freedom of teaching. The work concludes that the adopted regulation adequately realizes the autonomy of academic education. The analyses show that the adopted solutions enough balance the requirement to protect the public interest and the need to respond to the needs of the socio-economic partners of higher education institutions. In this way, the quality of education is balanced with the need to introduce new curricular content into the programs of study, responding to the challenges of today’s university graduates.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.