Search results

1

Opinia prawna na temat finansowania działalności poselskiej poza granicami kraju

100%

Karolczak J. M.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2012

|

issue 2(34)

154-156

EN

The Parliamentary lump sum as well as the parliamentary allowance intend to cover the activities of MPs in the country. The Deputies’ activities, which take place outside the country can only be financed in case of delegation abroad.

2

Wykonywanie władzy delegowanej kilku lub wielu osobom (kan. 140–141 KPK)

89%

Dzierżon G.

Annales Canonici

|

2012

|

vol. 8

EN

In the presented article the author made detailed interpretation of can. 140–141 CIC which concerning power delegated to one or many persons. He pointed out that the rules included in these canons are supposed to guarantee „collision - free” realization of the one’s duties.The author proved that the dispositions concerning power delegated in solidum and consecutively are not of a nature of an annulling act (can. 140 § 1, 141 CIC). He believes that what the legislator tried to avoid by using such legislative techniques was invalidity of actions taken by other delegated persons.On the other hand, the directives included in can. 140 § 2 CIC concerning collegial delegation are of a nature of an annulling act. This, however, results not from the content of the canon but rather from the nature of things since a collegiate act is substantially not a sum acts of particular people but a new act.

3

Miejsce wykonywania pracy mianowanych kontrolerów - prawo, doktryna, regulacje wewnętrzne NIK

63%

Padrak R.

Kontrola Państwowa

|

2020

|

vol. 65

|

issue 2 (391)

21-41

EN

Workplace –as an element of employment relationship –is of great importance to the protection of employees’ rights. Its appropriate definition plays a significant role in the interpretation of the regulations setting out, e.g. business trips. It is a complex issue, mostly due to the lack of a definition of the notion of ‘workplace’. The provisions of the Law on the Supreme Audit Office, as well as those of the other labour regulations, do not regulate the issue precisely. In his article, the author presents the existing judicature and doctrine related toworkplace in its legal sense. He also refers tothe views on potential ways todefine it with regard tothe NIK nominated auditors, depending on the type of the work they do. It is an attempt on an original discussion on the issue, which takes into account the internal regulations of NIK.

PL

Miejsce wykonywania pracy jako element treści stosunku pracy ma doniosłe znaczenie dla ochrony praw pracownika. Prawidłowe jego określenie odgrywa istotną rolę w interpretacji przepisów regulujących na przykład przebywanie w podróży służbowej. Jest to zagadnienie skomplikowane, przede wszystkim ze względu na brak definicji miejsca pracy. Przepisy ustawy o Najwyższej Izbie Kontroli, podobnie jak innych pragmatyk, nie regulują jednoznacznie wszystkich kwestii z tym związanych. Artykuł przybliża dorobek orzecznictwa i doktryny dotyczący miejsca wykonywania pracy w znaczeniu prawnym. Prezentuje też poglądy na temat możliwych sposobów jego określenia w stosunku do mianowanych kontrolerów NIK, w zależności od rodzaju wykonywanej przez nich pracy. Jest próbą autorskiego ujęcia problemu, uwzględniającego wewnętrzne regulacje Izby.

4

Poprawna interpretacja kan. 538 § 3 i kan. 1110 z Kodeksu Jana Pawła II. Dwa zapytania z Krakowa do Papieskiej Rady ds. Tekstów Prawnych

63%

Rozkrut T.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2020

|

vol. 31

|

issue 2

5-29

EN

This article presents two inquiries directed to the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts by canonists from Cracow. The presentation in question was preceded by synthetic indication of rules for performing interpretation of the Church’s law, specifically the role of the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts. This special Dicastery of the Roman Curia also provides answers to numerous inquiries, thus providing assistance to various authorities and individual people of faith in interpreting norms that are, basically obvious, but that raise doubts. In such cases it is used to clarify the arose doubt and contributes to correct interpretation of the existing law in practice. It arises from the provided answers that the institution of parish priest is regarded as stable, which is clearly stated in can. 522 of the Code of Canon Law. One of the elements that are a guarantor of the parish priest institution, though not listed outright by the general legislator, is a possibility to remain in the position until one reaches seventy five years of age. This also confirms that this age, that is determined in the Code, cannot be changed by the particular legislator in any valid manner. Thus, also the possible customs in a given Diocese that were introduced after John Paul II promulgated the post-conciliar code in 1983 that are in contradiction to provisions included in that Code must be regarded as erroneous, as they are not in line with can. 26. Explanation provided by the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts in regards to the arose doubt of a possibility to grant delegation by a personal parish priest to bless canonical marriage also occurred to be important in practice. Likewise territorial parish priest, personal parish priest has identical authorizations in this matter. As it can be observed, the Pontifical Council for Legislative Texts provides very useful and competent help in solving various legal doubts that are of great importance for functioning of the Church. If even before getting competent answers a large number of canonist had similar views to those presented in explanations, which was actually demonstrated, then the answers provided by the Vatican indicate a definitive solutions to the arose doubts and at the same time encourage those who – assuredly not out of ill will –succumbed to very subjective and erroneous interpretation, to correct it.

5

Status kanoniczny małżeństw zawieranych przy asystowaniu kapłanów Bractwa Kapłańskiego Świętego Piusa X (FSSPX) po wydaniu listu Papieskiej Komisji Ecclesia Dei z 27 marca 2017 r.

63%

Pietras D.

Ius Matrimoniale

|

2022

|

vol. 33

|

issue 1

79-116

EN

On the initiative of pope Francis, by the letter of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei of March 27, 2017, norms were introduced for granting delegation to priests, before whom the faithful attached to the Priestly Fraternity of Saint Pius X wish to marry. The priests of this community, which is part of the Catholic Church, are canonically irregular and do not have the status of ordinary or parish priest. So they need the required delegation ad validitatem to assist in getting married. In the light of the document under discussion, such a delegation is issued by the local ordinary. The community, using the issued regulations, maintains the thesis that marriages contracted before a priest of the FSSPX without delegation, referring – due to the situation of the Church after the Second Vatican Council – to the extraordinary canonical form of marriage and to a common error, as well as a positive and probable doubt in the light of can. 144 of the Code of the Canon Law of 1983. The Holy See, in the documents issued by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei and the decrees and sentences of the Tribunal of the Roman Rota, maintains the position that these marriages are contracted invalid due to the lack of a canonical form.

PL

Z inicjatywy papieża Franciszka listem Papieskiej Komisji Ecclesia Dei z 27 marca 2017 r. wprowadzono normy udzielania delegacji kapłanom, przed którymi wierni przywiązani do Bractwa Kapłańskiego Świętego Piusa X (FSSPX) pragną zawrzeć małżeństwo. Kapłani tej wspólnoty, będącej częścią Kościoła katolickiego, trwają bowiem w nieregularności kanonicznej i nie posiadają statusu ordynariusza bądź proboszcza. Potrzebują więc wymaganej delegacji ad validitatem do asystowania przy zawarciu małżeństwa. W świetle omawianego dokumentu taką delegację wydaje ordynariusz miejsca. Wspólnota korzystając z wydanych regulacji, podtrzymuje jednak tezę o ważności małżeństw zawartych przed kapłanem z FSSPX bez delegacji, powołując się – z powodu sytuacji Kościoła po II Soborze Watykańskim – na nadzwyczajną formę kanoniczną zawarcia małżeństwa oraz na błąd powszechny, a także wątpliwość pozytywną i prawdopodobną w świetle kan. 144 KPK/83. Stolica Apostolska w dokumentach wydanych przez Papieską Komisję Ecclesia Dei oraz dekretach i wyrokach Trybunału Roty Rzymskiej utrzymuje stanowisko, iż małżeństwa te są zawierane nieważnie z powodu braku formy kanonicznej.

6

Поездка делегации Мукачевско-Пряшевской православной епархии в Москву и канонический переход в состав РПЦ (на материалах ГАРФ)

51%

Данилец Ю.

Rocznik Teologiczny

|

2017

|

vol. 01

131-150

RU

Статья посвящена подготовке, проведению и результатам поездки православной делегации Мукачевско-Пряшевской православной епархии в Москву в декабре 1944 года. Согласно архивным документам в организации этого события главную роль сыграло военное руководство политуправления 4-го Украинского фронта. Предполагаем, что они стояли за подготовкой основных документов, которые были отправлены в Москву. Они материально способствовали самой реализации поездки, встреч, аудиенций. Этот шаг был использован советским руководством в политических торгах с Чехословакией и в распространении своего влияния на западноукраинских землях.

EN

The article is devoted to the preparation, conduct and results of the trip of the delegation of the Orthodox Mukachevo-Presov Region Orthodox diocese in Moscow in December 1944. According to archival documents in the organization of this event, the main role was played by the military leadership of the political directorate of the 4th Ukrainian Front. We assume that they were behind the preparation of the main documents that were sent to Moscow. They have contributed to the material implementation of the most trips, meetings and audiences. This move was used by the Soviet leadership in political bargaining with Czechoslovakia and in spreading its influence in Western Ukraine.

Refine search results

2 Ius Matrimoniale

1 Annales Canonici

1 Kontrola Państwowa

1 Rocznik Teologiczny

1 Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

1 Dzierżon G.

1 Karolczak J. M.

1 Padrak R.

1 Pietras D.

1 Rozkrut T.

1 Данилец Ю.

1 2022

2 2020