Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  development agreement
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This article is devoted to the study of the legal status of legal relations’ subjects in the public procurement field, as well as the settlement of legislative problems that arise in the spheres of public procurement and public-private partnerships (PPP) in Ukraine. The necessity of implementation into the legislation of Ukraine the concept of “special purpose company” is substantiated. The experience of foreign countries in implementing PPP projects in the area of “public procurement” (for instance, Latvia, Australia, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Belgium and other countries) is analyzed in detail. In particular, it has been determined that in Belgium mainly two methods of public procurement are used: concession agreements for the performance of work and development agreements, which in any case provide for financing the project by the private sector. Under the concession agreement for the performance of work, a private partner carries out the construction and financing of the entire volume of work or part thereof, and also subsequently operates the facility for a certain period of time. When making public procurement under PPP (development agreement), a private enterprise finances the work and further construction, after which it transfers ownership or leases the facility to a public partner or third party. The public partner or the aforementioned third party further pays the rent or license fee to the private company. Belgian public procurement laws do not apply to concession contracts for the provision of services, which, however, must correspond to the requirements of the general principles of contracts, such as, for example, the principles of transparency and competition. It is proved that the establishment of the Unified State Register of public sector entities will allow to unify the legislation of Ukraine in the field of PPP. The thesis is substantiated that the implementation of PPP projects is possible by applying the so-called “property law Construction”, in which these projects can be implemented through the alienation or transfer of state property rights (purchase and sale, long-term property right to use real estate), or “superficial right”. At the same time, public procurement legislation is not being apllied if public sector entities do not stipulate specific conditions under which private partner acquires a property right to the corresponding real estate and enjoys this right (when, for example, a state authority sells land to a private partner, provided that the latter will build the parking lot complex), and also if no obligation to purchase or lease can be imposed subject to the legislation in public procurement sphere.
EN
In the Developer Act of 2021, compared to the Act of 2011, the scope of pre-contractual information specified in the standard information form constituting an appendix to the Act was increased and clarified. Due to the broader scope of the current act, the pre-contractual information concerns a larger catalog of contracts. The main information tool is the standard information form, but other methods of informing are also provided (information at the business premises, .mini. standard form information). However, the experience resulting from the previous developer act and the analysis of the best legislative models of EU and Polish consumer law have not been fully used. For example, the legal nature of the standard information form, in particular in relation to the offer and to the contract, was not determined; no requirements were introduced for the information to become clear and understandable from the beginning and not only at the moment of its changes; the buyer is not guaranteed sufficient time to familiarize himself with the standard information provided.
PL
Przedmiotem opracowania są wybrane zagadnienia dotyczące odpowiedzialności dewelopera za wady lokalu mieszkalnego lub domu jednorodzinnego w ramach rękojmi oraz na podstawie przepisów ustawy o ochronie praw nabywcy lokalu mieszkalnego lub domu jednorodzinnego. Analizowany jest charakter odesłania zawartego w art. 27 ust. 6 ustawy deweloperskiej, stosunek przepisów kodeksu cywilnego o rękojmi za wady do postanowień art. 27 ust. 1–5 ustawy deweloperskiej oraz problematyka dopuszczalności stosowania art. 557 § 1 kodeksu cywilnego. Zaproponowany w artykule sposób rozumienia tych postanowień pozwala pogodzić ich brzmienie z zasadniczym celem ustawy deweloperskiej, którym jest ochrona praw nabywcy.
EN
The subject of the article are the main issues regarding a developer’s liability for defects of a flat or a single-family house under the warranty for defects and under the provisions of the act on the protection of the rights of a flat or a single-family house purchaser. The analysis includes the legal nature of the reference in art. 27 al. 6 of “the development act”, the mutual relations of the provisions of the Civil code on warranty for defects and the provisions of art. 27 al. 1–5 of “the development act”, as well as the issue of applying art. 557 § 1 of the Civil code. The article proposes an interpretation of these provisions that reconciles their wording with the objective of “the development act” which is to protect the purchaser’s rights.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.