Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ecclesiastical history
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

P. Birmingham inv. 317: An Addendum to the Fourth-century Bishops of Oxyrynchus?

100%
Blumell L. H.
The Journal of Juristic Papyrology
|
2014
|
issue 44
83-91
EN
This article offers an edition of an unpublished fragment in the J. Rendel Harris collection at the University of Birmingham. The fragment appears to date from the second half of the fourth century and is noteworthy because it mentions a bishop of the city of Oxyrhynchus. While the name of the bishop is partially lost, the name Dorotheus appears to be the most likely candidate. If such is the case, this is the first piece of papyrological evidence for this bishop who otherwise only appears in ecclesiastical records as an attendee of the Council of Constantinople in A.D. 381.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Dohlížet, léčit, trestat. Několik postřehů k působení apoštolských nunciů v zemích Koruny české

88%
Banďouch SJ P.
Historie – Otázky – Problémy (History, Issues, Problems)
|
2022
|
vol. 14
|
issue 1
105-116
EN
The article focuses on one aspect of the work of apostolic nuncios to the emperor in the late 16th and early 17th century in the lands of the Crown of Bohemia. Based on the analysis of selected documents of ecclesiastical provenance, including correspondence between the nuncios and the Curia, it highlights the importance of legal terminology and turns of phrase in the discourse under study
3
Content available remote

Maximilianus Wietrowsky: „Překlad“ jako forma historiografické práce

75%
Bočková A.
Folia historica Bohemica
|
2016
|
vol. 31
|
issue 1
53–65
EN
The paper examines the historiographic production of Maximilian Wietrowsky SJ (1660–1737), especially the method of his work with sources. Although the author admits his nonauthenticity, referring to his sources in numerous marginals, he fails to mention his main source – the French historian Louis Maimbourg (1610–1686). This was perhaps caused by Maimbourg’s conflict with Rome, his expulsion from the Jesuit order and putting some of his works on a list of banned books. The paper compares Wietrowsky’s Latin translations with the French originals and shows to what extent it is a literal translation or a revision, which more or less draws from the original source. The essay concentrates in detail on Historia S. Joannis Nepomuceni, the process of its emergence, the compilation of several sources and the further textual tradition in the form of translations into vernacular languages.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.