Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  effectiveness of proceedings
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The primary goal of the study is to conduct analyses, on the basis of theoretical and empirical knowledge to describe the level of using and processing the verifying testimony on the spot in the Slovak criminalistics. For this method, it is typical that it is less frequent for use in investigative practice. The research, which was significantly larger than the results published here, shows that there is relatively little knowledge about this method among the police. Another important knowledge from research is the interest in the method in general, but its immediate application can be imagined by considerably fewer police officers. The secondary goal was to find out lacks and troubles in practical applying the verifying testimony on the spot, in the process of investigating crimes in Slovakia last years. The specific part of the study and research is also devoted to the history of the development of the concept and content of the method. These are very important parts of the study. They help to understand not only the formal legal definition in the legal regulation but also the true nature of the method and its structure. The author makes short concepts to propose changes necessary for effective using the verifying testimony on the spot in the Slovak police practice however mainly in the process of investigation. This study is a partial output for research vysk. 151.
EN
The importance of ethical boundaries in the exercise of the right of defence has been written about for a long time. The defendants’ use of the entitlement granted to them by the legislator (Article 6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure) should harmonise with respecting the culture of criminal proceedings. Meanwhile, as practice has demonstrated, the culture of ongoing proceedings often remains outside the required standards of the process. The use of so-called “evasive defence”, assessment of participants to the proceedings through the prism of stereotypes, demonstrating offensive behaviour towards representatives of procedural bodies, or a superficial analysis of the evidence collected reinforce the negative perception of the course of proceedings, thus promoting inappropriate procedural patterns. Furthermore, these situations form the basis for the emergence of judicial mistakes, which usually leave a lasting mark on the further fate of the plaintiff in court. In accordance with theoretical assumptions, effectiveness in the exercise of rights of defence (Article 6 of the CCP) should correlate not only with the fundamental objectives of criminal proceedings (Article 2 of the CCP) but also with well-established assumptions that comply with the standards of diligence as broadly understood, along with the fulfilment of the procedural guarantees of the parties to the proceedings. This paper focuses on crucial issues related to the ethical boundaries of the exercise of the rights of defence. The issues discussed herein are supported by conclusions drawn from the analysis of the outcomes of case studies.
EN
The Author presented three basic concepts related to the praxeological aspects of the course of civil proceedings. The first concept is the speed of the proceedings as a postulate counteracting the excessive length of the proceedings. The second concept is the efficiency understood as a combination of speed and proper organization of activities in the course of the proceedings aiming at a correct decision of the court. The third concept is the effectiveness, for which it is essential to achieve the goal optimally with the involvement of appropriate costs.
PL
Autorka przedstawiła trzy podstawowe pojęcia odnoszące się do prakseologicznych aspektów przebiegu postępowania cywilnego. Pierwszym pojęciem jest szybkość postępowania jako postulat przeciwdziałania przewlekłości postępowania. Drugim pojęciem jest sprawność rozumiana jako połączenie szybkości i odpowiedniego zorganizowania czynności w toku postępowania dążącego do celu, jakim jest trafne rozstrzygnięcie sądu. Trzecim pojęciem jest efektywność, co do której zasadnicze znaczenie ma optymalne osiągnięcie tego celu przy zaangażowaniu odpowiednich kosztów.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.