Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  empathizing
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Empatia w strukturach organizacyjnych

100%
Kaźmierczak M.
Roczniki Psychologiczne
|
2004
|
vol. 7
|
issue 2
131-144
EN
Over the past few years we have observed an increasing number of theories concerning empathy and its positive influence on our everyday life. This article deals with the issue of empathy in the working environment. In a survey of studies the author attempts to prove that this dispositional trait is required in various professions at different ranks of an organizational hierarchy. Possible negative consequences of empathizing are considered as well. The author concludes that empathy, once neglected, nowadays is highly valued by psychology of organization and management.
2
Content available remote

Autistic and dysphasic children differ in social responsiveness and empathy but not in systemizing behavior

100%
Hrdlička M., Urbánek T., Mrkvička A., Komárek V., Pospíšilová L., Mohaplová M., Blatný M., Dudová I.
Československá psychologie (Czechoslovak Psychology)
|
2023
|
vol. 67
|
issue 5
308-314
EN
Objectives. The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) and the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient (EQ/SQ) scale are both used for the assessment of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). This study aimed to investigate the use of both scales to assess another neurodevelopmental disorder, namely developmental dysphasia (DD). Additionally, we examined differences in social, empathetic, and systemizing characteristics between ASD and DD groups. Sample and settings. The authors examined 103 children with (1) ASD (n = 30, mean age 8.4 ± 2.6 years), (2) DD (n = 35, mean age 8.9 ± 2.3 years), and (3) healthy control children (HC; n = 38, mean age 9.2 ± 1.6 years) using the SRS and EQ/SQ assessments. Subjects with additional psychiatric diagnoses, e.g., intellectual disabilities and/or genetic syndromes, were excluded from the study. Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA, chi-square test, and Kruskal-Wallis test with the Bonferroni correction were used. Hypotheses. The null hypothesis was that there are no significant differences between the ASD, DD and HC subgroups on the Social Responsiveness Scale and on the Empathizing/Systemizing Quotients. Results. There were statistically significant differences on the SRS between the ASD, DD, and HC groups (97.0 vs. 52.0 vs. 29.0, p<0.001). Differences in EQ scores were also significant between the groups in total (17.0 vs. 30.0 vs. 35.0, p<0.001); however, post-hoc tests did not confirm a significant difference between the DD and HC groups. There were no statistically significant differences on the SQ score between the groups. Limitations. The gender imbalance of our subgroups and the relatively small sample size of our study were the main limitations of our study.
CS
Cíle. Metody Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) a Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient (EQ/SQ) jsou škály využívané pro posouzení jedinců s poruchou autistického spektra (PAS). Cílem této studie bylo prozkoumat využití obou škál k posouzení jiné neurovývojové poruchy, konkrétně vývojové dysfázie (VD). Dále byly zkoumány rozdíly v sociálních, empatických a systemizujících charakteristikách mezi skupinami PAS a VD. Soubor a metody. Použitím metod SRS a EQ/SQ bylo posouzeno celkem 103 dětí ve skupinách (1) PAS (n = 30, průměrný věk 8,4 ± 2,6 let), (2) VD (n = 35, průměrný věk 8,9 ± 2,3 let), a (3) zdravé kontroly (ZK; n = 38, průměrný věk 9,2 ± 1,6 let). Subjekty s dalšími psychiatrickými diagnózami, např. mentální retardací a/nebo genetickými syndromy byly ze studie vyřazeny. Statistická analýza. K analýze dat byly použity: deskriptivní statistika, jednocestná ANOVA, chí-kvadrát test a Kruskal-Wallisův test s Bon-ferroniho korekcí. Hypotézy. Nulovou hypotézou bylo, že mezi skupinami PAS, VD a ZK nebudou ve výsledcích metod Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) a Empathizing/Systemizing Quotient (EQ/SQ) statisticky významné rozdíly. Výsledky. Statisticky významné rozdíly byly nalezeny ve škále SRS mezi skupinami PAS, VD a ZK (97,0 vs. 52,0 vs. 29.0, p < 0,001). Rozdíly ve skórech EQ byly celkově mezi skupinami také významné (17,0 vs. 30,0 vs. 35,0, p < 0,001), nicméně post-hoc testování nepotvrdilo významný rozdíl mezi skupinami VD a ZK. Ve skórech SQ nebyly mezi skupinami potvrzeny statisticky významné rozdíly. Limity. Nevyvážené zastoupení pohlaví mezi skupinami a relativně malý výzkumný soubor byly hlavními limity studie.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.