Results found: 2

Search results

Search:
in the keywords: empirical theory

Sort By:

Limit search:

Blaski i nędze empirycznego literaturoznawstwa (i jego odczytań). Uwagi na marginesie lektury rozważań Andrzeja Wasilewskiego Teoria literatury Stanisława Lema

100%

Mazurkiewicz A.

Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Poetica

2021

vol. 9

290-305

This review focuses on the essay by Andrzej Wasilewski Teoria literatury Stanisława Lema [Stanisław Lem’s Theory of Literature]. This work differs from other previously mentioned studies for several reasons. The author focuses on a specific aspect of Lem’s intellectual work, namely, on the theory of literature. This was a new issue that had not previously been given much thought when considering Lem’s works. However, despite how it was advertised, the essay is of a philosophical nature rather than about the theory of literature. Nevertheless, despite the misunderstandings and the hermetic style of the dissertation, this monograph was the first to offer a wider view on the issues of literature. In this sense, Wasilewski’s essay may play an important role in this field and make it easier for future researchers to comprehend the issue of understanding Lem’s essays.

W recenzji omówiona została rozprawa Andrzeja Wasilewskiego Teoria literatury Stanisława Lema. Jest to praca wyróżniająca się na tle pozostałych, przywołanych uprzednio opracowań z kilku względów. Autor, zgodnie z tytułem, koncentruje się na wybranym aspekcie intelektualnej działalności Lema, tj. teorii literatury. To z pewnością zagadnienie w refleksji nad myślowym dorobkiem Lema nowe, któremu nie poświęcano dotychczas większej uwagi. Jednakże, wbrew zapowiedziom, rozprawa sytuuje się raczej w kręgu filozofii niż teorii literatury. Niezależnie jednakże od nieporozumień oraz hermetycznego stylu wywodu omawiana monografia jest pierwszą rozprawą oferującą tak szerokie spojrzenie na zagadnienia związane z literaturą. W tym sensie rozprawa Wasilewskiego może pełnić istotną funkcję rekonesansu, ułatwiającego przyszłym badaczom rozpoznanie problematyki rozumienia literatury w eseistyce Lema.

Po co psychologia?

80%

Brzeziński J. M.

Polskie Forum Psychologiczne

2014

vol. 19

issue 3

285-304

Three main problems are considered. The first is that psychology should avoid any inclination towards neuroscience or a type of brain science. Making use of the achievements of natural sciences, psychology should take into regard the cultural conditions [determinants] and methods worked out in social sciences. Thus, it should adopt the antireductionistic methodological programme. The second problem is that psychology must reject the papers that entice with apparent scientific approach being actually of no real worth. Also the threat posed to psychological practice by pseudo-scientific monographs and pseudo-test should be recognised. They offer scientifically false basis of practical work of psychologists in the sphere of social practice. The third problem is that each psychological practice should be preceded by a psychological theory that is empirical and needs to be verified by a methodologically correct method. Thee underlying empirical psychological theory makes a given psychological practice sensible and ethical. The status of psychology as a science and the status of psychological practice are related to the quality of education of future psychologists. The author definitely opts for the model of full-time 5-year master’s degree studies (so against the Bologna model of 3-year licentiate (BA) followed by a 2-year master’s degree study (MA)), supplemented with a one-year training under supervision of an experienced specialist. The effective and ethical work of professional psychologists in Poland suffers from the lack of legal regulations that would protect this profession against the infiltration of all kinds of charlatans offering pseudo-scientific diagnostic tools like e.g. the Tree test of Charles Koch and therapies like e.g. the Systemic Constellation of Bert Hellinger. Of utmost importance is development of not only methodological awareness but also ethical awareness in psychologists and students of psychology. Moreover, the education should bring the realisation of the effects and danger of scientific misconduct of FFP type, that is fabrication, falsification, plagiarism.

Refine search results

1 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Poetica

1 Polskie Forum Psychologiczne

1 Brzeziński J. M.

1 Mazurkiewicz A.

1 2021

1 2014

Search results

Blaski i nędze empirycznego literaturoznawstwa (i jego odczytań). Uwagi na marginesie lektury rozważań Andrzeja Wasilewskiego Teoria literatury Stanisława Lema

Po co psychologia?