Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  evidence-based policy making
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1

Analyzing scientific knowledge in documents: The case of regulatory impact assessment

100%
Staroňová K.
Human Affairs
|
2014
|
vol. 24
|
issue 3
299-306
EN
Regulatory impact assessment (RIA) is seen as a tool for increasing evidence-based policy making and as such it is being integrated into decision-making procedures on a wide range of issues. Based on systematic consultation, clear criteria for policy choice, and economic analysis of how costs and benefits impact on a wide range of affected parties, this tool operates by using scientific knowledge and technical analysis rather than political considerations. Scientific knowledge can be used to achieve instrumental learning (Radaelli, 2009, OECD), policy change (Sabatier, 1999), to impact on decision making (Caplan, 1979; C.H.Weiss, 1999) but also to seek legitimacy from the policy environment (Edelman, 1985; Schrefler, 2010). This article suggests an analytical framework for analysing RIA documents with insight from knowledge utilization theories. We argue that in order to better understand the RIA itself, we need to look at institutional factors as well. The combination of institutional context variables and variables for RIA document content analysis which make up worldviews in this framework provide the basis for the document analysis and exploration of RIA in its context.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Evidence-Based Policy Making and the Implementation of Regulatory Impact Assessment in Croatia

86%
Petak Z.
Management and Business Administration. Central Europe
|
2015
|
issue 2
147-162
EN
Purpose: This study is dealing with the application of evidence-based policy-making in Croatian public administration and the general role of applied policy analysis in the Croatian system of governance. Methodology: This development is illustrated by the peculiarities of introducing regulatory impact assessment (RIA) tools in Croatian public administrative structures. Findings: The author is pointing out various limitations in the usage of policy analysis tools in formulating, implementing and evaluating public policies in Croatia. The crucial role of RIA for enhancing executive capacity of governance structures is particularly stressed in the study. The final part of the article is devoted to the prospects of further development of RIA as an applied policy analysis tool within the Croatian system of governance.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

A new approach to policy evaluation in the Europe Union

81%
Kubera P.
Przegląd Politologiczny
|
2017
|
issue 4
21-30
PL
Znacząca rola Unii Europejskiej w rozpowszechnianiu ewaluacji w Europie jest ogólnie uznana (Stern, 2009). Chociaż ewaluacja ma długoletnią tradycję w Unii, a zwłaszcza w Komisji Europejskiej, w ostatnich latach można zaobserwować proces jej ekspansji, dywersyfikacji i instytucjonalizacji. Celem artykułu jest zbadanie nowych rozwiązań w dziedzinie polityki ewaluacyjnej w Unii Europejskiej, którą można scharakteryzować między innymi, wzmocnieniem powiązań między oceną wpływu ex ante i ex post, zamykając tym samym cykl polityki, w którym wnioski z ewaluacji ex post przekładają się na ocenę nowych przedsięwzięć publicznych. Stąd też, w artykule poruszony został problem wykorzystania wyników ewaluacji. Zakres ewaluacji również został rozszerzony i obejmuje nie tylko instrumenty związane z wydatkowaniem środków finansowych, ale także instrumenty regulacyjne. Ponadto, ewaluacji podlegają nie tylko pojedyncze programy czy projekty, ale polityki i grupy powiązanych ze sobą działań. W tym celu dokonano przeglądu literatury i dokumentów w dziedzinie teorii i praktyki ewaluacyjnej, w tym analizy przepisów prawnych regulujących praktykę ewaluacyjną w Unii Europejskiej.
EN
The significant role of the European Union in diffusion of evaluation in Europe is widely acknowledged (Stern, 2009). Although evaluation has a long-standing tradition in the EU, and in particular within the European Commission, in recent years one can observe the process of its expansion, diversification and institutionalisation. The aim of the paper is to explore the new developments in evaluation policy in the EU, which can be characterised, among others, by strengthening the links between ex ante and ex post impact evaluations and thus closing the policy cycle, where ex post evaluation feeds into ex ante assessment of new public actions. Hence, the problem of utilisation of evaluation findings is discussed. The scope of evaluation performed at the EU level has also been extended from expenditure to regulatory instruments. Moreover, there has been a shift from evaluating merely projects and programmes to evaluating policies and aggregated activities. To this end, a literature and documentary review on evaluation theory and practice have been conducted, as well as the analysis of the normative provisions that are applied to guide the practice of evaluation in the EU.
4

An Overview of Discourses on Knowledge in Policy: Thinking Knowledge, Policy and Conflict Together

72%
Sedlačko M., Staroňová K.
Central European Journal of Public Policy
|
2015
|
vol. 9
|
issue 2
10-31
EN
Around the world, there is a growing interest among policy scholars and practitioners in the role of knowledge in relation to public policy. These debates are accompanied by some confusion about what is meant by knowledge or evidence, as well as controversies around the role of scientists and suspicions of increasingly technocratic decision making. Our aim is to provide a useful overview of the major debates in this paper, and to trace six dominant discourses in current research that address the role of scientific knowledge or expertise in the policy process. We distinguish evidence-based policy making, knowledge utilisation, policy learning, knowledge transfer, social construction of knowledge and boundaries, and knowing in practice as separate discourses. We show how they differ in their understanding of knowledge, of the problem to solve in terms of the role of knowledge in policy, of practical implications, as well as in their understanding of public policy and in their ontologies and epistemologies. A condensed and structured representation serves as a basis for conducting comparisons across discourses as well as to open ways for analysis of strategic associations between the discourses. We hope to contribute to extending the discussion of knowledge in policy into the realm of epistemic politics and we suggest several avenues for future research that can draw on a range of concepts from across all of the discourses.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.