Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 10

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  fair play
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Background. A new era of youth and formation of a new system of values are much talked about. The aim of this study was to describe and explain the relationship between socioeducational factors and the growing popularity of the attitude of fair play among young people undertaking physical activity and at the same time experiencing the formation of a new system of values and morality. Material and methods. The study involved more than 600 senior high school students from 2 kinds of schools: sports-oriented and Christian. The study was conducted in Gdansk, Gdynia and Sopot in 2000, 2008 and 2012. Youth for testing were chosen randomly, regardless of affiliation to these schools. The variable that differentiated respondents from these schools was involvement of young people in sport. An auditory survey was used during a lesson in a special research room. Results. General value system in general is an important and significant predictor of attitudes of fair play. High evaluation of the higher-order values, such as the truth, the holy and the moral, are of particular importance for the development of sports morality. Conclusion. A way to change the negative trends in the axiosphere of today’s youth is educating young people in the values of fair play.
EN
John Paul II judged that sport has great meaning in human life. To make sport available among men to teach them the values like: loyalty, persistence, friendship, community whether solidarity. Sport can also offe valuable contribution in peaceful agreement between nations as well as contribute to fixation in world of new civilization of love. John Paul II showed also how important is fair play in sport. Pope John Paul II worned of the dangers in sport. Warned from the obsession of profit and comercjalization from the best results in sport cost them their health through doping even whether use of different of prohibited methods. Athletes especially the most famous become patterns for youth, therefore should remember about this, to they unreeled at me human features also and spiritual stately to imitation. Every sport contests should deliver entertainment and one should eliminate violence which prejudices great traditional sport foundations. Sport can not be only aim, but it has to be to man's universal development values on attention deserve first of all. Man in sport should grow up spiritually, intellectually, morally and socially. Sport should be able to carry joy and to enrich man in every respect.
3
84%
PL
Sport odgrywa coraz większą rolę społeczną i gospodarczą. Co za tym idzie, w celu dalszego rozwoju tej dziedziny, jak również wyeliminowania negatywnych zjawisk w niej występujących, należy określić oraz wprowadzić zasady dobrego zarządzania w sporcie. Celem niniejszego artykułu jest przedstawienie instrumentów prawnych wykorzystywanych do zapewnienia dobrego zarządzania w sporcie. Zostały przedstawione przepisy prawa powszechnie obowiązującego dotyczące tej tematyki, jak również dokumenty wydane przez organy europejskie oraz organy administracji rządowej odpowiadające za sprawy sportu, mające na celu zachowanie zasad transparentności i przejrzystości. Dodatkowo, wskazano na regulacje prawa wewnętrznego ustanawianego przez organizacje i związki sportowe mające na celu przyczynienie się do upowszechniania sprawnego zarządzania w danym sporcie.
EN
Sport plays an increasingly important social and economic role. Consequently, in order to further develop this field, as well as eliminate the negative phenomena occurring in it, it is necessary to define and introduce the principles of good governance in sport. The purpose of this article is to present the legal instruments used to ensure good governance in sport. General law provisions regarding this subject were presented, as well as documents issued by European bodies and government administration bodies responsible for sport matters, aimed at maintaining the principle of transparency. In addition, the regulations of internal law established by sports organizations and associations aimed at contributing to the dissemination of efficient management in a given sport were pointed out.
4
84%
EN
Background. Relevance of the research. This paper attempts to consider fairness in athletes in the context of the philosophy of sport. It is a non-empirical study in which a causal model of the pursuance of sporting utopia is discussed. Recent cases where the ontic order of sport has been broken by sprinters and swimmers, and the current case of Russian athletes (who have violated the rules of proper conduct in their personal lives), show how easily the state of a sports anti-utopia can be reached. The aim of the study is to explain the key rationis sufficientis and causa to achieve a sports utopia. Research methods and organization. By using regressive deduction, reaching back to primary metaphysical premises, it explains the key reasons for achieving a sports utopia. Results and discussion. The applied regressive reasoning model reveals that the success of a sports utopia as a variety of social utopia, is determined by authoritative judges managing the common good of the sports family. There is a reason why the sporting community is referred to as the sports family. Maintaining familial relationships is, in itself a utopia, i.e. a daunting but feasible task. And although the hopes of every family, as with the “sports family”, are its children, only the adult family members – capable of assuming responsibility for the common good – can maintain order in the family and render all its activities sensible. Similarly, the successful organization of competitions in the sports family, aiming at perfection according to the family’s ideals, is only possible if competitive order is preserved by: a) judge-categorizers responsible for maintaining sexual-somatic equality; b) judge-classifiers responsible for ontic equality (extra-sexual physicality) of the gymnasium (gym) ascetics; c) judge-exposers responsible for revealing the ontic inequalities of doping abusers; and d) judge- moderators responsible for ensuring moral equality between competitors. In the discussed causal model I did not initially identify that a “new child” had entered the sports social system – a child born into a world of liberal usurpation, with whom the establishment of a familial relationship regarding freedom, morality, ideals and authority would be very difficult. I had not thought about this which it appears is key to understanding the cause of the failure of sports competition in humanistic terms, i.e. the cause of the deconstruction of the sports utopia. Conclusion. If it had not been for these judges’ authoritative enforcement of moral and ontic equality among athletes, (without diminishing athletes’ contributions to the creation of fair competition) it could be assumed that liberally, relativistically and individualistically disposed athletes would not have been able to tackle their humanistic tasks by themselves.
PL
W eseju przedstawiam model przyczynowy zajścia ku utopii sportowej, tłumacząc – w rozumowaniu regresywnym, idącym wstecz, ku najpierwszym, metafizycznym przesłankom – kluczowe racje (X) jej spełniania. Ostatnie przypadki łamania porządku równości ontycznej przez sprinterów, czy pływaków – naruszających normę dobrego obyczaju w życiu osobistym, pokazują, jak łatwo można wytworzyć stan antyutopii. Zastosowany model rozumowania regresywnego pokazuje, że o pomyślności utopii sportowej, jako odmianie utopii społecznej, decyduje starszyzna sędziowska, zdolna do autorytatywnego zarządzania dobrem sportowej rodziny. Jest jakaś racja w tym, że społeczność sportową nazywa się rodziną. Czy trwanie w relacjach rodzinnych nie jest zadaniem utopijnym, a więc poniekąd trudnym, a jednak ostatecznie wykonalnym. I choć nadzieją rodziny są dzieci, także „rodziny sportowej”, to nie one, tylko dorośli jej członkowie – zdolni do przyjęcia odpowiedzialności za dobro wspólne – strzegą w niej ładu oraz nadają wszystkim poczynaniom sens. Podobnie, pomyślne przeprowadzanie konkursów w rodzinie sportowej, idące ku spełnieniu się w jej ideale, jest o tyle możliwe, o ile porządku doglądają w niej: a) sędziowie kategoryzatorzy – odpowiedzialni za stan równości płciowo-somatycznej, b) sędziowie-klasyfikatorzy – odpowiedzialni za stan równości ontycznej (poza-płciowej cielesności) ascetek i ascetów gimnazjonu, c) sędziowie-demaskatorzy – ukazujący nierówności ontyczne dopingowych oszustów oraz d) sędziowie-moderatorzy – odpowiedzialni za stan równości moralnej konkurentek i konkurentów. Gdyby nie udział starszyzny sędziowskiej w autorytatywnym wymuszaniu na sportowcach paradowania w szyku równości moralnej oraz równości ontycznej, to nie ujmując samym sportowcom udziału w podmiotowym tworzeniu konkursu sprawiedliwych można przypuszczać, że wolnościowo, relatywistycznie, indywidualistycznie i egoistycznie usposobieni sportowcy nie podołaliby sami humanistycznemu zadaniu.
EN
Abstract W artykule podjęto analizę wybranych kilkudziesięciu dzieł współczesnych socjologów i teoretyków sportu i humanistów (publikacje książkowe i artykuły), którzy rozważali rolę sportu w socjalizacji dzieci i młodzieży we współczesnym świecie. Material and methods Wykorzystano współczesną literaturę źródłową i naukowe opracowania poświęcone głównie socjologii i filozofii oraz teorii sportu, oraz publikacje z zakresu pedagogiki sportu, w których badacze skupiali się na społecznej roli aktywności sportowej. Results Autorzy wielu tekstów omawiających znaczenie sportu w życiu człowieka podkreślali również jego socjalizującą rolę, zwłaszcza w obecnych czasach, kiedy to postawy skrajnie indywidualistyczne niszczą więzi społeczne; istnieje w związku z tym konieczność większego zwrócenia uwagi osób dorosłych na wychowanie społeczne dzieci i młodzieży przez sport i aktywność ruchową. Conclusions W świetle przeprowadzonych badań sport dzieci i młodzieży ma bardzo duże znaczenie socjalizujące, a jego uprawianie jest konieczne nie tylko ze względów zdrowotnych, ale i społecznych.
PL
Streszczenie W artykule podjęto analizę wybranych kilkudziesięciu dzieł współczesnych socjologów i teoretyków sportu i humanistów (publikacje książkowe i artykuły), którzy rozważali rolę sportu w socjalizacji dzieci i młodzieży we współczesnym świecie. Materiał i metody Wykorzystano współczesną literaturę źródłową i naukowe opracowania poświęcone głównie socjologii i filozofii oraz teorii sportu, oraz publikacje z zakresu pedagogiki sportu, w których badacze skupiali się na społecznej roli aktywności sportowej. Wyniki Autorzy wielu tekstów omawiających znaczenie sportu w życiu człowieka podkreślali również jego socjalizującą rolę, zwłaszcza w obecnych czasach, kiedy to postawy skrajnie indywidualistyczne niszczą więzi społeczne; istnieje w związku z tym konieczność większego zwrócenia uwagi osób dorosłych na wychowanie społeczne dzieci i młodzieży przez sport i aktywność ruchową. Wnioski W świetle przeprowadzonych badań sport dzieci i młodzieży ma bardzo duże znaczenie socjalizujące, a jego uprawianie jest konieczne nie tylko ze względów zdrowotnych, ale i społecznych.
EN
In this paper I argue for a cross-disciplinary approach to teaching sport ethics. I call this a logical and evolutionary account because information that emanates from cell biology, anthropology, philosophy and everywhere in between, I claim, is needed in developing effective fair play pedagogies. The gist of the argument is this: We need to teach smarter, not just harder. Teaching smarter, I say, comes from an understanding of human nature and the logic of sport. I discuss animal behavior, emotions, genetic predispositions, human evolution, the structure of games, philosophical idealism, and other factors in producing five recommendations for teaching sport ethics.
EN
Aggression and violence have been a customary part of life that mankind has had to live with from the beginning of time; it has been accepted by society even though it expresses endless negativity. Aggression and violence can find a place in sports events and football games because of the social problems of the audience watching the competitions or games, which sometimes fall into the category of hooliganism. Turkey is one of the countries that should consider this problem to be a serious social problem. Even during 2014 and 2015, a relatively short period of time, there were significant hazardous acts committed by hooligans. In February 2014, one supporter was killed after a game between Liverpool and Arsenal in England; in March 2014, a game between Trabzonspor and Fenerbahce was left half-finished because of violent acts in the stadium that caused players in the pitch to believe that they could not leave stadium alive, although they finally left after a few hours; in another incident in March 2014, one supporter was killed after a game between Helsingborg and Djugarden in Sweden; in November 2014, one supporter was killed and 14 supporters were injured before the game between Atletico Madrid and Deportivo in Spain. These are all examples of aggression, violence, and hooliganism in football. This paper aims to discuss aggression, violence, and hooliganism in football, especially in recent years, and investigate what can be done to prevent these acts from occurring again in the future by examining them in hindsight.
EN
The aim of this study is to analyze enjoyment and fair play attitudes against hard play, gamesmanship, victory and cheating as antisocial behaviors in sports as part of a program of intervention among coaches and athletes. The sample includes basketball teams with a total of 389 young athletes (249 boys and 140 girls) aged between 10 and 16 (the average age of 12.5 years) in the juvenile, infant and cadet categories. During the 2016-2017 season, a questionnaire designed according to the guidelines for the Spanish version following the Fair Play Proceedings (EAF) was administered at two different times. The results show that young athletes consider enjoyment as a key motivation in sports practice. The program proved to be moderately effective as antisocial variables such as gamesmanship and cheating, and recorded a slight decrease in popularity between the two rounds of the survey. The results for hard play and victory, however, showed a less significant decrease after the implementation of the program.
EN
The objective of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of a program of intervention among coaches and athletes; to evaluate attitudes in favor of fun and fair play in sports and, on the other hand, hard play, gamesmanship, the need for victory and cheating as attitudes that go against prosocial behaviors. The sample includes football teams with a total of 636 young athletes (615 boys and 21 girls) with an average age of 12.50 years and an age range between 10-16 years in the juvenile, infant and cadet categories during the season 2016-2017. An adapted version of the Spanish Questionnaire for Fair Play Proceedings (EAF) was administered at two different times. The results show that young athletes value sport positively as fun at two moments of the season. The program was shown to be effective, although not significantly, in terms of a decrease in the values of gamesmanship, cheating and victory between the first moment and later moments in the program. Hard play, on the other hand, did not present an improvement in the program.
10
60%
PL
The paper presents a causal model of a utopian vision of sport which explains – in regressive model, i.e. going back to the original, metaphysical premises – key reasons (X) of its fulfillment. The recent cases of breaking the rule of ontological equality by sprinters or swimmers, which violates the standard of decency in personal life, show how easy it is to produce a state of dystopia. The regression model applied here demonstrates that the referee elders determine the success of sports utopia as a variant of social utopia. They are capable of authoritatively managing the good of sports family. There must be a reason why sports community is called a family. Is it not a utopian task to persevere in family relationships, which are somehow difficult but ultimately feasible. Although children are the future and hope of the family, which also regards a “sports family”, it is not the children but its adult members, able to take responsibility for the common good, who keep order in the family and give sense to all its actions. Similarly, a good execution of competition within a sports family which is aimed at reaching the fulfillment of the family’s ideal, is possible only if the following referees are employed to supervise its execution: a) category referees – responsible for equal gender and somatic shares, b) classification referees – responsible for ontological equality of male and female ascetics attending the gymnasium, c) referee debunkers – indicate ontological inequality of dopers, d) referee moderators – responsible for moral equality of male and female competitors. If it was not for the referee elders who force authoritatively athletes to march in formation of moral and ontological equality, in no way diminishing the role of athletes themselves in creating a fair competition, it can be assumed that athlete with their spirit of freedom, relativism, individuality and egoism would not be up to this humanistic task.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.