Search results

1

EU Citizens or Eastern European Labour Migrants? The Peculiar Case of Central Eastern Europeans in Britain

100%

Ciupijus Z.

Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

|

2012

|

issue 2.3(20.3)

29-46

EN

The text is developed on the basis of the research conducted among immigrants from Central and Eastern Europe (Poland, Slovakia, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania). Based on the interviews with immigrants the author tries to reconstruct the reception of immigrants by the host society indicated by the degree of access to tangible and symbolic goods (e.g. work, social protection, prestige, etc.) The Schengen Agreement introduced free movement of people between most but not all states of the European Union. Depending on the country of origin, it resulted in differentiation between migrants who can move freely and those who are denied such unrestricted movement across the EU. Such divide can be seen not only in the sphere of freedom of movement but also in the sphere of awarding and not awarding individuals with certain goods and privileges.

2

“Empty Human Rights Lip Service”: France’s Roma Expulsions and the Failure of the European Union to Exercise Its Racial Equality Directive

75%

Patten A.

Polish Yearbook of International Law

|

2011

|

vol. 31

315-347

EN

This article argues that the arrests and expulsion of large numbers of Roma carried out by the French government in 2010 violated the European Union’s human rights principles because non-French Roma were targeted collectively for removal. In response to the expulsions, the European Commission initiated infringement proceedings against France for procedural violations of European Union Directive 2004/38 (the Free Movement Directive). However such racially discriminatory state action should be challenged more properly as a substantive violation of Directive 2000/43 (the Racial Equality Directive). Because the European Union does not have its own separate body of human rights law that is binding within Member States, using the Racial Equality Directive to offer protection to vulnerable minorities by challenging discriminatory state practices may be an alternative method of achieving human rights objectives within Member States. Moreover, since the Racial Equality Directive lacks interpretation, a situation of race-based expulsion of EU migrants would be an opportunity to clarify and develop the scope and meaning of the Directive.

3

Glosa do uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 2 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. Akt II ops 1/19

63%

Pudło-Jaremek A.

Roczniki Administracji i Prawa

|

2020

|

vol. 4

|

issue XX

281-288

EN

The Supreme Administrative Court stated that the domestic regulations did not allow the transcription of a foreign birth certificate in which persons of the same sex are entered as parents. This position is against EU law.

PL

W głosowanej uchwale Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny stwierdził, że krajowe przepisy nie pozwalają na transkrypcję zagranicznego aktu urodzenia, w którym jako rodzice wpisane są osoby tej samej płci. Takie stanowisko jest niezgodne z prawem UE.

Refine search results

1 Polish Yearbook of International Law

1 Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

1 Roczniki Administracji i Prawa

1 2021

1 2012

1 2011

1 Ciupijus Z.

1 Patten A.

1 Pudło-Jaremek A.

EU Citizens or Eastern European Labour Migrants? The Peculiar Case of Central Eastern Europeans in Britain

“Empty Human Rights Lip Service”: France’s Roma Expulsions and the Failure of the European Union to Exercise Its Racial Equality Directive

Glosa do uchwały Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 2 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. Akt II ops 1/19