Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 5

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  guild
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This study deals with the situation of rural masters in Moravia based on the example of a tailor and cobbler guild founded in Šlapanice in 1834. The author analyses different means of dependency of the rural masters on their home guild, the problems that were linked to this dependency, and the reasons for founding a new guild. This study also shows guild life in Moravia during the 19th century and all that was connected to it.
Prawo
|
2015
|
issue 319
119 - 140
EN
There is no doubt that legal norms regulating the status of widows in guild law were universal and far from particular. As a rule, as seen in guild statutes, the rights of widows in the towns and cities of Wielkopolska were similar to those in Prudnik, Upper Silesia. Nevertheless, as the issue is analysed from the perspective of legal archaeology, it becomes possible to verify the application of statutory law in practice or the existence of customary law, and to examine the practice of everyday life of artisan guilds. When it comes to the town of Prudnik and the local artisan guilds, it has to be said that the 1668 guild chest kept in the Prudnik Museum definitely originated in the town and most likely belonged to the local bakers’ build. It was funded not only by members of the corporation, but also by widows, who had limited guild rights, in particular the right to run a business in their own right. As the most important provisions of the 1547 and 1555 statutes of the Prudnik bakers’ guild show, in the light of the 1668 guild chest, it has to be said that the legal status of widows was a significant exception to the exclusive nature of the guild. Moreover, there is no doubt that women could be members of the Prudnik bakers’ corporation.
EN
Goldsmithery has belonged to important handicrafts in Slovakia. Goldsmiths have been making not only devotions, but also serviceable and decorative utensils of gold and silver. The archival documents of goldsmith guild in Banská Bystrica include 175 goldsmiths who were active from the 14th to the 19th century. One of the most prominent representatives of goldsmithery in the 19th century in Banská Bystrica was Samuel Libay (1782-1866), who was goldsmith master craftsman for several years. In 1841, he finished his first great and extraordinary artwork made of fine, silver wire, filigree bust of the emperor Francis I.
PL
Pieczęcie cechowe są ważnym i nadal słabo rozpoznanym działem sfragistyki. Interesująca kolekcja tego typu zabytków jest przechowywana w Muzeum Diecezjalnym w Płocku. Jej twórcą był Franciszek Tarczyński, a skatalogował ją ks. Tomasz Kowalewski. Znalazły się w niej pieczęcie cechów z Chodzieży, Kowala, Łowicza, Sandomierza, Starej Warszawy, Płocka i Włocławka.
EN
Guild seals are an important and still poorly recognized in the historiography of science department of sfragistic. Interesting collection of monuments of this kind has been collected in the Diocesan Museum in Plock. It was created by Franciszek Tarczyński, and cataloged by priest Tomasz Kowalewski. The stamps have been affixed to his cardboard boards. Stock of the guilds of Plock, Lowicz, Sandomierz, Old Warsaw, Kowal, Chodziez, and Wloclawek.
PL
Celem artykułu było ukazanie cech demograficznych rodzin rzemieślników cechowych i ich gospodarstw domowych w Hetmanacie Kozackim (kozackie terytorium autonomiczne położone na lewym brzegu Dniepru) w drugiej połowie XVIII wieku na przykładzie miast Poltava, Pereiaslav i Nizhyn. Przeanalizowano wskaźniki i wielkość populacji rzemieślników i ich rodzin, typy rodzinne i strukturę gospodarstw domowych na podstawie Generalnego Opisu Lewobrzeżnej Ukrainy z lat 1765–1766 („Spis ludności Rumiancewa”). W tym celu uwzględniono czynnik specjalizacji rzemieślniczej – obliczenia przeprowadzono osobno dla najbardziej rozpowszechnionych rzemiosł występujących we wszystkich miastach: tkactwa, kowalstwa, szewstwa i rzeźnictwa. Ustalono, że rzemieślnicy osiedli w miastach Hetmanatu byli rozproszeni, a rzemieślnicy cechowi zamieszkiwali we własnych domach z podwórzem i innymi przyległymi zabudowaniami o charakterze mieszkalnym lub gospodarczym („dvor”) (99,2–81,3%). Tego rodzaju gospodarstwa domowe funkcjonowały w prostej strukturze zabudowy, która obejmowała jeden dom (50,2%) lub dom ze spiżarnią (16,1%). Oznacza to, że rzemieślnicy nie mieli specjalnego miejsca na warsztaty, z wyjątkiem kuźni zlokalizowanych poza gospodarstwami domowymi. Na podstawie wskaźników demograficznych można stwierdzić, że ludność rzemieślnicza miast Hetmanatu wpasowywała się w model zachodnioeuropejski, jako że wiodąca pozycja należała do rodziny nuklearnej (68,7%). Rodzina złożona zajmowała drugie miejsce – 13,6%, a rodzina rozszerzona plasowała się na trzecim – 11,7%. Przeciętnie gospodarstwo domowe rzemieślnicze liczyło sobie 5,8 osoby, a obsada rodzin – 4,5 osoby. Wielkość ta była mniejsza w porównaniu z kozackimi i chłopskimi („pospolyti”) gospodarstwami domowymi w miastach Hetmanatu. Pracownicy, uczniowie, czeladnicy, krewni i inne osoby mogły również mieszkać w gospodarstwie domowym ze swoją rodziną. Mistrzowie przyuczali od jednego do czterech uczniów jednocześnie. Wielkość gospodarstw domowych rzemieślników różnych zawodów pokazuje, że pomimo różnorodności regionalnej domostwa („dvory”) rzeźników nie były silnie obsadzone, a domostwa tkaczy i szewców były najbardziej zagęszczone pod względem obsady osobowej.
EN
The aim of the article is to observe the demographical characteristics of the Cossack Hetmanate (an autonomous Cossack territory situated on the Left Bank of the Dnieper River), guild craftsman families and households in the second half of the 18th century in the cities of Poltava, Pereiaslav and Nizhyn. The index and size of the craftsman household population, and their family densities are analyzed, their family types and household development structure are defined on the basis of the General Description of the Leftbank Ukraine of 1765–1766 (“Rumyantsev Census”). Craft specialization was considered for this purpose – calculations were made separately for the most widespread crafts, given in all cities: weaving, blacksmithing, tailoring, shoemaking and butchering. It was determined that artisans settling in the Hetmanate cities were of a dispersive character, with guild craftsmen living in their own yards (99.2–81.3%). These households had simple residential accommodation, which included one house (50.2%) or a house with a pantry (16.1%). This means that artisans did not have a special space for workshops, excluding smithies located outside households. According to the demographic indexes, the craftsman population of Hetmanate cities fits the western European model, as the leading position belonged to the nuclear family (68.7%). Multifocal family occupies second place with 13.6% and the extended family occupies third place with 11.7%. On average, the population of the craftsman households was 5.8 people, with the density of their families 4.5 persons. This size was smaller than the Cossack and peasant (“pospolyti”) household size in the Hetmanate cities. Workers, apprentices, journeymen, relatives or other persons could also live in a household with a family. Master craftsmen taught from one to four apprentices simultaneously. Household size for artisans of different professions shows that, despite the regional diversity, butchers’ yards were sparsely populated, and the yards of weavers and shoemakers were the most crowded.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.