Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  high-frequency data
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the article two popular low-frequency methods od bid-ask spread estimation are presented and applied to the stocks quoted on the Warsaw Stock Exchange (WSE): the Roll method [Roll 1984] and Corwin-Schultz method [Corwin and Schultz 2012]. The widely available data on average spreads published by WSE are used as benchmark and proxy of information, usually received from difficult to access and limited high-frequency financial data
EN
The paper presents a procedure of application of regular hierarchical models in forecasting missing data in high-frequency time series with cyclical fluctuations. Annual, weekly and daily cycles of seasonal fluctuation have additive character. Separately regular hierarchical models have been built for even length cycles.Theoretical considerations are illustrated with an empirical example.
EN
In this study, we analyse the performance of option pricing models using 5-minutes transactional data for the Japanese Nikkei 225 index options. We compare 6 different option pricing models: the Black (1976) model with different assumptions about the volatility process (realized volatility with and without smoothing, historical volatility and implied volatility), the stochastic volatility model of Heston (1993) and the GARCH(1,1) model. To assess the model performance, we use median absolute percentage error based on differences between theoretical and transactional options prices. We present our results with respect to 5 classes of option moneyness, 5 classes of option time to maturity and 2 option types (calls and puts). The Black model with implied volatility (BIV) comes as the best and the GARCH(1,1) as the worst one. For both call and put options, we observe the clear relation between average pricing errors and option moneyness: high error values for deep OTM options and the best fit for deep ITM options. Pricing errors also depend on time to maturity, although this relationship depend on option moneyness. For low value options (deep OTM and OTM), we obtained lower errors for longer maturities. On the other hand, for high value options (ITM and deep ITM) pricing errors are lower for short times to maturity. We obtained similar average pricing errors for call and put options. Moreover, we do not see any advantage of much complex and time-consuming models. Additionally, we describe liquidity of the Nikkei225 option pricing market and try to compare the results we obtain here with a detailed study for Polish emerging option market (Kokoszczyński et al. 2010b).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.