Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Acta Neophilologica

Years help

  1. 1 2008

Authors help

  1. 1 Dovhopolyj J.

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ideological work of the Party organs
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

ZAGADNIENIA JĘZYKOZNAWSTWA JAKO TERAPIA W PRZYPADKU PRZEMĘCZENIA

100%
Dovhopolyj J.
Acta Neophilologica
|
2008
|
vol. X
91-102
EN
The present article deals with the role which played Marr and Stalin in Soviet linguistics. In the late 1920s and early 1930s, political language came under increasingly strict and unified Party control. The modernist theories of language were replaced by the “new theory developed by Soviet ethnographer and archeologist Nikolai Marr, who argued, in a Marxist evolu- tionist tradition, that language is part of the superstructure and its transformations follow changes in the social base. Linguistic formulations were evaluated by Party experts, among whom Stalin was the chief expert. In 1950 Stalin publicly attacked theoretical schools in Soviet linguistics on the pages of “Pravda” for “vulgar Marxism”. He critiqued Marr’s view of language. He also attacked the view of language as a tool of production, i.e. as a part of the base, the view that was still dominant in the ideological work of the Party organs.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.