Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ideologie edukacyjne
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
This article presents some themes in literature for children considered to be taboo, especially those within the areas of the sacred and the profane. The article draws attention to differences between traditional literature (including the magic fairy tale) and contemporary books in the treatment of subjects such as death, transience, and sexuality. It doing this it can be seen that these subjects have become more and more open to the child, something which is expressed in the acceptance of the child’s right to interpret even the most „difficult” concepts and the right to show her/his feelings. Modernity brings with it a tendency to cross barriers of taboo in almost every area, and the slogan „it is forbidden to forbid!” also applies to publications addressed to the youngest of children. This does not mean, however, that the child has unlimited access to all subjects, as s/he is limited by the barriers imposed by the person who serves as an intermediary in the reception of the work. Treating, or not treating, some spheres of reality as taboo for children depends on the chosen ideological options adopted by educators. breaking taboos in recent literature for children occurs in areas where educational discourses conflict, particularly when books touch upon the profane. It is worth noting that works within the themes of the sacred and the profane are equally important because they show the „completeness” of the reality in which children’s reflections on life and their sense of humor are complementary to each other.
Forum Oświatowe
|
2014
|
vol. 26
|
issue 2(52)
113-134
EN
The purpose of this article is to present the views of conservative opponents on state intervention in education. The author analyzed the opinions presented in the press and on websites. In the opinion of conservatives, compulsory education and centrally established and imposed programs and ideals violate the autonomy of the family – the basic educational community. They also indicated that education was used by rulers to manipulate society and to impose their own vision of the world. Conservatives are in favor of privatization of education, leading to its pluralism: the development of schools with different ideological character. This would enable parents to choose schools consistent with their outlook.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie poglądów przeciwników ingerencji państwa w szkolnictwo, wywodzących się ze środowisk konserwatywnych. Analizie poddano wypowiedzi przedstawiane w prasie i na witrynach internetowych. W przekonaniu konserwatystów przymus kształcenia oraz centralistycznie ustalane ideały wychowawcze i treści kształcenia naruszały autonomię podstawowej wspólnoty wychowawczej, jaką stanowiła rodzina. Wskazywano także, że szkolnictwo było wykorzystywane przez rządzących do manipulowania społeczeństwem, narzucania własnej – partyjnej wizji świata. Konserwatyści opowiadają się za prywatyzacją szkolnictwa, która doprowadziłaby do jego pluralizacji, rozwoju szkół o zróżnicowanym charakterze ideowym. Umożliwiałoby to rodzicom wybór szkoły zgodnej z ich światopoglądem.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.