Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  individual farmer
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Act on the shaping of the agrarian system of 5 August 2015 provides new legal instruments limiting freedom of the contract and limiting the property right. This article deals with the proplems arising during the interpretation of the provisions of this act regarding pre – emption right of the owner of the bordering property. Individual farmer who exercises pre – emption right and acquires agricultural property is not bound to enlarge his family farm. The owner of the vended property is obliged to indicate which of his neighbours – owners of the properties bordering to his property – has the priority in pre-emption. Author also considers situation of the co-owners as the holders of the pre-emption right.
EN
The article discusses a wide range of issues concerning the amendments introduced to the Polish bill od 11th April 2003 on shaping of agricultural structure by the law of 16th September 2011. Among other things, the law altered definition of the individual farmer, one of the most important institutions in Polish system of agricultural law. In the first instance, the article examines the modifications of the criteria which construct the definition of the individual farmer. Among them the special emphasis is laid on the criterion of professional qualifications, because of the fact that its redaction was strongly criticized on the basis of the former legislation. Author makes an attempt to evaluate the new formulation of above mentioned definition trying to point out its both positive and negative aspects. Further, Author describes current status of individual farmers in Polish agricultural law, indicating few regulations which concern this professional group in Poland. The analysis refers to the situation after the introduction of the law of 16th September 2011 and results in firm dispraise of the current regulations. With respect to above–mentioned arguments, the strong need of further studies both on definition of individual farmer and his status in Polish legal system– is to be stressed.
EN
According to Article 172 § 3 of the Civil Code, title to agricultural property may be obtained by way of usucaption only by the individual farmer. This regulation has given rise to numerous doubts as to its interpretation. It should be noted here that for the purpose of determining the scope of application of this provision, one should not make references to the Act of 11 April 2003 on shaping the agricultural system to the extent that the same does not result directly from Article 172 § 3 of the Civil Code. Particular difficulties occur with the application of Article 172 § 3 of the Civil Code to mixed type of property, which is only partially agricultural, held under acquisitive prescription by a person who is not an individual farmer. In this case, one should assume that the person in question may only acquire title to the non-agricultural portion of such property. In the event of usucaption of agricultural property by the individual farmer, the Agricultural Property Agency may exercise its right of acquisition under Article 4 of the Act on shaping the agricultural system. However, this solution is highly dysfunctional as the exercise of the right of acquisition by the Agency may lead to division, or even liquidation, of the family farm run by the individual farmer.
PL
Zgodnie z art. 172 § 3 Kodeksu cywilnego zasiedzieć nieruchomość rolną może jedynie rolnik indywidualny. Uregulowanie to jest źródłem wielu wątpliwości interpretacyjnych. Wskazać trzeba, że określając zakres zastosowania tego przepisu, nie należy sięgać do regulacji ustawy z dnia 11 kwietnia 2003 r. o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego w zakresie, w jakim nie wynika to wprost z art. 172 § 3 k.c. Szczególny problem z zastosowaniem art. 172 § 3 k.c. pojawia się w sytuacji, gdy posiadacz samoistny, niebędący rolnikiem indywidualnym, włada nieruchomością o mieszanym, jedynie częściowo rolnym charakterze. Wówczas należy przyjąć, że zasiedzieć może on jedynie jej część nierolną. W razie zasiedzenia nieruchomości rolnej przez rolnika indywidualnego Agencja Nieruchomości Rolnych może wykonać prawo nabycia z art. 4 ustawy z dnia 11 kwietnia 2003 r. o kształtowaniu ustroju rolnego. Jest to rozwiązanie dysfunkcyjne, ponieważ wykonanie prawa nabycia przez Agencję może doprowadzić do rozbicia, a nawet likwidacji gospodarstwa rodzinnego prowadzonego przez rolnika indywidualnego.
EN
At present, the agricultural real estate can be, in principle, acquired only by an, so called, individual farmer. However, the latest amendments to the Act of 11 April 2003 on Formation of the Agricultural System, created some new, liberalizing derogations from previously mentioned general rule. Moreover, together with these derogations, the structure of the Act has become more complicated. This article is devoted to the questions caused by modified regulations, especially in the field of notary practice.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.