Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  interpretivism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Interpretive International Relations (IR) has become a robust and diverse research programme, consolidating across various subfields of the discipline. However, this is a recent phenomenon. While early classical realists and English School scholars clearly drew on interpretive thought, these contributions did not coalesce into a welldefined and specifically interpretive research agenda. The ‘interpretive turn’ in social sciences and humanities in the 1970s and epistemological pluralisation of political science and IR in the 1990s slowly made space for interpretive theory and research. This paper reconstructs, first, what makes interpretive IR distinct, and, second, what it means to engage in interpretive inquiry in this field, conceptually and substantively. It discusses in particular the implications of the monist ontological position that interpretivists tend to occupy and the conditions of knowledge production within the hermeneutical circle. These reject the possibility of transcending the context and bring to bear the researcher’s involvement in knowledge production as inevitable but generative. The paper also explicates the still poorly understood concept of ‘intersubjectivity’ as being defining for the interpretivist sensibility and one which directly contests positivist ideals. Interpretive IR scholarship serves as a veritable showcase for interpretive research practice, and points to the growing significance and volume of such scholarship.
2
100%
EN
The aim of the paper is to present the premises of the interpretative approach, with its internal diversity and methodological implications. While the first part of the paper discusses possible meanings connected with the concept of an interpretive approach, the second focuses on methodological implications and choices inspired by interpretivism.
PL
Celem artykułu jest ukazanie możliwości i potencjału analitycznego stosowania filtra płci do analizy określonych fragmentów rzeczywistości społecznej, którymi w tym przypadku są życie i relacje małżeńskie oraz rodzinne, a także sposobów badania samej kategorii płci. By uzyskać założony cel, przedstawione zostały trzy projekty badawcze, ulokowane w paradygmacie interpretatywnym, w których kolejno poddano analizie relacje wewnątrzrodzinne kobiet (badania biograficzne), mężczyzn (m.in. zogniskowane wywiady grupowe), oraz małżonków razem (fenomenologia rodziny). W opisie każdego z nich uwypuklone zostały założenia metodologiczne, a zwłaszcza sposób odniesienia się w nich do kategorii płci wyznaczającej perspektywę badawczą i interpretacyjną. Płeć – zarówno badanych jak i badaczy – w jej wymiarze społeczno-kulturowym oraz biograficznym jest perspektywą rozumienia i nadawania znaczeń, a także ważnym filtrem interpretacyjnym w badaniach. Owo zróżnicowanie odzwierciedla nie tyle biologiczny, ile społeczny i kulturowy charakter różnic między kobietami i mężczyznami – widoczny w koncepcji gender, a wyniki badań wpisują się w tezę Jessie Bernard, że bycie w małżeństwie i rodzinie, na skutek odmiennych doświadczeń mężczyzn i kobiet, jest płciowo zróżnicowane
EN
The aim of the article is to show the possibilities and analytical potential of using a gender filter in the analysis of certain fragments of social reality, in this case everyday life and the marital and family relationships, as well as the methods of studying the gender category itself. To achieve the desired result, three research projects were presented. All of them were located within imperative paradigm, in which family relationships of women (biographical research), men (i.e., focused group interviews) and both spouses together (family phenomenology) were subsequently analyzed. In the descriptions of each of them emphasis was given to methodological assumptions, especially the way of referring to gender as the category determining research and interpretative perspective. Gender – of both examiners and examinees – in its socio-cultural and biographical dimension is a perspective of understanding and giving meanings, and it is also an important filter in research. This differentiation reflects not so much the biological as the social and cultural character of differences between women and men – visible in the conception of gender, moreover the results of research incorporated in the thesis of Jessie Bernard that being in marriage and family is gender-differentiated because of different experiences of men and women.
PL
Artykuł podejmuje zagadnienie dominacji paradygmatu pozytywistycznego w badaniach zarządzania zasobami ludzkimi w Polsce. W celu weryfikacji takiej właśnie hipotezy przeanalizowano wszystkie artykuły badawcze, które opublikowane zostały w czasopiśmie „Zarządzanie Zasobami Ludzkimi” w latach 2007–2016. Potwierdzono wyraźnie częstsze wykorzystywanie narzędzi badawczych i procedur należących do nurtu funkcjonalnego (pozytywistycznego), przy jednoczesnym pomijaniu deklaracji rodzaju stanowiska paradygmatycznego, w którym toczone jest badanie.
EN
The article tackles the issue of the dominance of the positivist paradigm in the study of human resource management in Poland. All research articles published in Human Resource Management between 2007 and 2016 were examined in order to verify such a hypothesis. The clear and frequent use of research tools and procedures located in the functional (positivist) stream was confirmed. However, declarations relating to a position for the research paradigm applied were absent.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.