Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  juvenile justice
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
Article is a summary of the research project realized in The Institute of Law Studies of the Polish Academy of Sciences. In the course of project, there were conducted national surveys addressed to juvenile judges, professional family probation officers, experts from diagnostic teams and the individual in-depth interviews with selected representatives of these groups. The aim of the article is to present the results of the researches, the mainly the answer on the question how do juvenile courts realize in practice the assumptions of the Act on Proceeding in Juvenile Cases. Researches, in the application of law, have been considered particularly important because the law obliges the juvenile judges to collect information about juvenile and his/her environment – directly or indirectly (by supporting institutions).
Society Register
|
2019
|
vol. 3
|
issue 4
171-184
EN
The author uses Critical Discourse Analysis to compare two legal documents of critical relevance for the rights of children in conflict with the law in Argentina: the current law no. 22,278, called Régimen Penal de la Minoridad, and the project named Sistema de Responsabilidad Penal Juvenil which was under consideration by the National Congress during 2019. This project was proposed by the government so as to stablish a new juvenile justice system in Argentina, following a widely spread tendency in the Latin American region. The purpose of the article is to show that, even though the language of human rights is used in official discourse and in the legal text submitted to Parliament, many of its features represent a clear backlash to a more conservative regime.
EN
Article is a summary of the research project realized in The Institute of Law Studies of the PolishAcademy of Sciences. In the course of project, there were conducted national surveys addressed to juvenile judges, professional family probation officers, experts from diagnostic teams and the individual in-depth interviews with selected representatives of these groups. The aim of the article is to present the results of the researches, the mainly the answer on the question how do juvenile courts realize in practice the assumptions of the Act on Proceeding in Juvenile Cases. Researches, in the application of law, have been considered particularly important because the law obliges the juvenile judges to collect information about juvenile and his/her environment – directly or indirectly (by supporting institutions).
PL
Article is a summary of the research project realized in The Institute of Law Studies of the PolishAcademy of Sciences. In the course of project, there were conducted national surveys addressed to juvenile judges, professional family probation officers, experts from diagnostic teams and the individual in-depth interviews with selected representatives of these groups. The aim of the article is to present the results of the researches, the mainly the answer on the question how do juvenile courts realize in practice the assumptions of the Act on Proceeding in Juvenile Cases. Researches, in the application of law, have been considered particularly important because the law obliges the juvenile judges to collect information about juvenile and his/her environment – directly or indirectly (by supporting institutions). Artykuł stanowi podsumowanie projektu badawczego zrealizowanego w Instytucie Nauk Prawnych Polskiej Akademii Nauk. W ramach projektu zostały przeprowadzone dwa rodzaje badań: 1) ogólnopolskie badania sondażowe skierowane do trzech grup respondentów – sędziów dla nieletnich, zawodowych kuratorów rodzinnych oraz specjalistów zatrudnionych w opiniodawczych zespołach sądowych specjalistów, 2) indywidualne półustrukturyzowane wywiady jakościowe z przedstawicielami tych trzech grup zawodowych. W artykule zostały zamieszczone tylko niektóre wyniki. Szczególna uwaga została poświęcona realizacji założeń Ustawy o postępowaniu w sprawach nieletnich w praktyce orzeczniczej sądu. Potrzebę badań w tym zakresie uzasadnia fakt ustawowego zobowiązania sędziego dla nieletnich do gromadzenia informacji o nieletnim i jego środowisku - bezpośrednio lub pośrednio przy wykorzystaniu instytucji pomocniczych.
EN
In the paper the problem of correction and rehabilitation of children as a social and political question of the 21st century, concerning either Europe or other developed and developing nations, is discussed. The Author suggests and proves that it is necessary to use an intersubject scientific approach to this question, as far as we have to analyze this topic either from the point of view of social safety net, of pedagogical, psychological sciences and jurisprudence. The aim of the article is to provide an overview of international norms and laws regulating this matter and, on turn, show how all these factors are tightly linked with each other. Moreover, such topics draw international community’s attention to national and cultural characteristics, causing a particular concern. In the paper, the Author led a comparative analyze of history of childhood like a passage of a stage of non-recognition of children as social agents as such to their legal equality, whose top was the Declaration of the Rights of the Child, issued in 1959. In spite of it, the Author alters that the way to come to a complete recognition of children is quite long already, because of the fact that we do not have a complete agreement neither in International right nor in national laws relations between law enforcement community, social services, children and their families. On that premises, Author of the present paper analyzed European, American and Russian system of juvenile justice, and it has been found that there are sharp differences in these systems, because if, on one hand, in Europe, children are given more rights than in America, where the concept “juvenile age” can change according to crime rate in the States. In Russia, situation is more difficult, because there is no developed system of juvenile justice and children are treated like adults, during trails, for example. After his comparative study, the Author could arrive at the conclusion that the state of affairs concerning children with special needs is not fully protected by law. If we take into account the dynamics of macro- and microeconomics, it is clear that go on cost cutbacks in social sphere retarding the regulation of such question as an international generally accepted system concerning the defense of rights of children’s special categories.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.