Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  kapitalizm polityczny
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The paper comprises an introduction, four parts, and conclusions. The introduction char- acterizes the fundamental notions discussed in the paper, namely kin selection, nepotism, cronyism and political capitalism. The first part of the paper concerns kin selection and reciprocal altruism, which are deemed to be the fundamental mechanisms of socialization. This part indicates that nepotism has a biological justification (and in R. Dawkins’ interpretation – a genetic justification). The mechanisms of kin selection and reciprocal altruism raise the question of whether nepotism is not a natural phenomenon in humans. If so, this means that the negative assessment of these phenomena of public life goes against natural human inclinations. The second part of the paper refers to the origins of the notion of nepotism and to a particu- lar understanding of the public realm in modern democracies. The development of democracy has been related to the transformation of the mechanisms of governance which consisted in concessions made by the authorities to those demanding changes. Political struggle has been minimized as it was directed at competition among citizens. The struggle for the change of power has been replaced by the struggle for access to positions and goods in the public realm. Axiological justification has been provided by social justice as a claim for equal access to goods by virtue of principles of transparency. The third part of the paper discusses the issue of nepotism and cronyism in public opinion. It refers to the results of public opinion surveys concerning, among other things, favoritism, ways of looking for jobs, unequal opportunities on account of social status, and the social sta- tus of the family. Additionally, selected examples of nepotism and favoritism in political life are presented. The fourth part deals with the issue of political capitalism both in the interpretation of M. Weber and as a phenomenon of the transition of the Polish socio-political system. Political capitalism can be defined in a nutshell as using state structures or political positions for an un- fair distribution of goods and is expressed by muddy links between the representatives of state with the private business sphere.
PL
Celem rozważań jest próba przedstawienia całościowej i uporządkowanej wiedzy na temat ekonomicznych i kulturowo-politycznych przyczyn korupcji w Polsce po 2004 roku. Również teza postawiona na wstępie, mówiąca, że korupcja jest następstwem ekonomicznych i polityczno-kulturowych uwarunkowań w Polsce, okazała się prawdziwa, bowiem na drodze analizy udało się dowieść, że głównymi przyczynami korupcji w Polsce, po uzyskaniu członkostwa w UE, są, po pierwsze, uwarunkowania ekonomiczne, na co wskazały źródła korupcji w Polsce w teorii ekonomistów-funkcjonalistów i neofunkcjonalistów, ich odniesienie do współczesnej rzeczywistości w Polsce. Po drugie – kulturowo-polityczne – wskazujące na źródła w tradycji i kulturze politycznej w różnych okresach historycznych Polski, to jest od czasów saskich, przez niemiecką okupację i okres realnego socjalizmu, aż po okres transformacji ustrojowej, na co wskazuje również literatura przedmiotu.
EN
An aim of considerations is an attempt to present comprehensive and organised knowledge on the economic and cultural-political reasons of corruption in Poland after the year 2004. Also the thesis put at the beginning, saying that corruption is a consequence of economic and political-cultural determinants in Poland – proved to be true as by way of analysis it was possible to ascertain that the main reasons for corruption in Poland, having acquired its membership in the EU, are, first, economic determinants what was indicated by the sources of corruption in Poland in the theory of economists-functionalists and neo-functionalists, reference thereof to the contemporary reality in Poland. Second, cultural and political, indicating the sources in the political tradition and culture in various historical periods of Poland, i.e. from the Saxon times, through the German occupation and the period of real socialism, till the period of systems transformation what is also indicated by the subject literature.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.