Search results

1

Problem planowania i kontroli w zakresie konserwacji tzw. zabytków ruchomych

100%

Pieńkowska H.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

1969

|

issue 2

131-134

FR

Le phénomène défavorable de la dégradation secondaire se manifestant dans les objectifs déjà conservés résulte soit d ’un manque de contrôle soit de l ’emploi erronné des fonds disponibles pour la conservation. Afin d ’éviter cet état de choses, il fau d ra it soumettre ce genre de trav a il à la planification et ceci dans une mesure aussi large que possible. Les éléments de base de cette planification consisteraient à choisir l ’objectif d’après une classification convenablement établie et à fixer la portée et le programme des travaux ainsi que leur devis approximatif. La planification doit se baser su r deux principes — celui de l’échelonnement et du trava il réparti en étapes. - Afin que leur éxecution soit convenable, lesdits tr a vaux doivent être confiés à des groupes de spécialistes, experts dans les disciplines envisagées. Une fois les trav au x terminés, un contrôle périodique de l ’é ta t de conservation, une documentation soigneusement r é digée et enfin la publication des m a té riau x ainsi que des discussions su r leur contenu p erme ttraient de tire r des conclusions profitables pour l ’avenir. Evidemment, les recherches visant les problèmes précités constitueraient l ’élément indispensable pour le développement de la science historique et technique.

2

O pomnikach historii dyskusji ciąg dalszy : w obronie "zabytku prawa"

100%

Konopka M.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2000

|

issue 2

191-193

EN

A response to the polemical text by J. Pruszyński. In Pomniki historii, nie wykorzystana szansa (The Monuments o f History, an Unexploited Chance, “Ochrona Zabytkow” 1999, no. 4) M. Konopka recalled the decree issued by the President of the Republic of Poland, establishing regions of special value, known as monuments of history. In his polemic, J. Pruszyński proclaims that the idea of monuments of history is legally unjustified since it reintroduces the harmful element of a classification of historical monuments in a situation when all are of equal rank. In the opinion of the polemist it is much more important for the Minister of Culture and National Heritage to obtain tax reductions for owners of monuments and greater funds for conservation. M. Konopka claims that monuments of history are a form of a choice which, in view of the absence of adequate means, is applied anyhow by the register of monuments and in different treatments o f assorted types of monuments according to their material and manner of execution. The Presidential decree should be implemented by means of an executive ruling issued by the Minister of Culture and National Heritage, which has never been presented. The debate thus pertains to the question whether to leave the moribund entry about monuments or to embark upon an attempt at discovering a form of their special treatment, mentioned in the Ministerls ruling.

3

TEORIA ZABYTKU ALOISA RIEGLA

63%

Szmygin B.

Ochrona Zabytków

|

2003

|

issue 3-4

148-153

EN

The year 2003 marked the hundredth anniversary of the appearance of Alois Riegel’s The Modern Cult of Monuments. Its Essence and Origin, a presentation of a holistic conception of the historical monument and the conservation doctrine. Moreover, the author analysed historical values and showed the changes to which they succumb due to conservation (the transformation of the historical monument). A. Riegel was an all-sidedly trained and experienced museum expert, as well as an historian and theoretician of art who did not turn his attention to the conservation of historical monuments until the end of his life. Consequently, his theory of the monument was complex and well-embedded in praxis. The views expounded by A. Riegel became the basis of twentieth-century conservation theory, preserved their topical nature for almost a whole century, and constituted the foundation for the Charter of Venice. Only the last decades undermined the Riegelian conception of the historical monument; nonetheless, in view of the absence of suitable theoretical foundations Riegel’s conception continues to hold an important position in the conservation of monuments.

Refine search results

3 Ochrona Zabytków

1 2003

1 2000

1 1969

1 Konopka M.

1 Pieńkowska H.

1 Szmygin B.

Problem planowania i kontroli w zakresie konserwacji tzw. zabytków ruchomych

O pomnikach historii dyskusji ciąg dalszy : w obronie "zabytku prawa"

TEORIA ZABYTKU ALOISA RIEGLA