Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  kolizja interesów
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
W niniejszym artykule poddano szczegółowej analizie normę art. 249. § 1. oraz art. 422. § 1. kodeksu spółek handlowych w zakresie możliwości zaskarżania uchwał wspólników (akcjonariuszy), które są godzące w interes spółki kapitałowej. Przedstawiono dwie główne koncepcje pojmowania interesu spółki. Przedstawiono także koncepcje kompromisowe, które zapatrują się na pojęcie interesu spółki przez pryzmat interesu wspólników (akcjonariuszy), traktują to pojęcie jako wskazówkę do rozstrzygania kolizji interesów oraz zbliżają do ujęcia w sposób abstrakcyjny złotego środka pomiędzy swobodnym, autonomicznym podejmowaniem decyzji przez wspólników (akcjonariuszy) a zabezpieczeniem spółki przed jej dewastacją.
EN
In this article, detailed analyzed the legal norm of art. 249. § 1 and art. 422. § 1 of The Code of Commercial Companies with regard to the possibility of appealing against resolutions of shareholders, that are breachting the interest of the capital company. It is presented two main concepts of the interest of company. Also it is presented compromise concepts, which look at the interest of company through the prism of the interest of shareholders and treat this idea as an indication for the resolution of the conflict of interest and allow in a abstract way to find a middle ground between free, autonomous decision-making by shareholders and securing the company against its devastation.
EN
The mutuality of rights and duties of individual and state, resulting from citizenship, is strengthened by constitutional rule of social solidarity which forms one of the bases of Polish political system. Loss of citizenship entails consequences for individual as well as the state, a citizen of which he is. Therefore, waiving of Polish citizenship depends on both the citizen's decision and President's assent, that is supreme representative of state who represents the state in both foreign and domestic relations. The reason why President assents to waiving of citizenship is that the rule of social solidarity says about the relation between the individual and the society and consequently the state which is formed by the society. If citizenship and social solidarity mean definite bonds between the individual and the state – a citizen of which he is – the President, as the supreme representative (the head of state) should assent to break the bonds. There is not complete freedom of President's assent, though. This is so because making the decision, the President should take into account constitutional regulations concerning both the human freedom (his constitutional right to decide about his own life) and social solidarity (constitutional duties resulting from living in a society). Taking the above into consideration, the President ought to make a decision based on conflicted interests carefully balanced (on the one hand particularistic interest of individual and public interest on the other hand).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.