Search results

1

O podziałach we współczesnej Ukrainie

100%

Karolak-Michalska M.

Cywilizacja i Polityka

|

2016

|

vol. 14

|

issue 14

242-253

PL

Celem artykułu jest poszerzenie rozważań na temat wieloaspektowych podziałów na Ukrainie. Autorka zwraca uwagę, że eksperci problematyki zadają pytania, co oznacza „wschód” i „zachód” Ukrainy? Odwołuje się również do podziałów etnicznych, językowych i kulturowych, w końcu traktuje o podziałach politycznych na Ukrainie. Wskazuje także, że podziały w społeczeństwie ukraińskim dotyczą wzajemnego postrzegania się narodów ukraińskiego i rosyjskiego. W końcowych fragmentach rozważań konstatuje, że jedne podziały pogłębiają drugie, czyniąc polaryzację Ukrainy poważnym problemem. Analizując wieloaspektowe podziały, dochodzi do wniosku, że bez desowietyzacji, państwo „nie wybije” się z autorytarnej drogi rozwoju i nie dokona skutecznej modernizacji.

EN

The aim of the article is to broaden the discussion on the multi-faceted divisions in Ukraine. Experts of Ukrainian problems are asking, what means „east” and „west” of Ukraine? Author refers to the division of ethnic, linguistic and cultural, in the end is about political divisions in Ukraine. It also indicates that the divisions in Ukrainian society deal with the mutual perception of the Ukrainian and Russian nations. In the final passages concludes that some of the other divisions deepen, making the polarization of Ukraine a serious problem. Analyzing multi-faceted divisions, it concludes that without de-Sovietizing, state „no strikes” with the authoritarian ways of development and make effective modernization.

2

Tradycja bizantyjska i jej wpływ na kulturę rosyjską w myśli Konstantina Leontjewa

100%

Bala M.

Kultury Wschodniosłowiańskie - Oblicza i Dialog

|

2016

|

issue 6

9-22

EN

The present article amounts to an attempt to analyze the Byzantine tradition in the work Byzantinism and the Slavs by Konstantin Leontiev. The thinker finds the heritage of Eastern Christianity an immanent part of the Russian national identity. Moreover, the philosopher defines Byzantinism as a type of culture with centralized power in the hands of the Romanovs. Consequently, Leontiev depicts particular stages of the evolution of this power model in Russia. The author of the paper concludes that the thinker’s considerations are centered on the emphasis on the role of monarchy in contemporary Russia rather than on its Byzantine roots.

PL

The present article amounts to an attempt to analyze the Byzantine tradition in the work Byzantinism and the Slavs by Konstantin Leontiev. The thinker finds the heritage of Eastern Christianity an immanent part of the Russian national identity. Moreover, the philosopher defines Byzantinism as a type of culture with centralized power in the hands of the Romanovs. Consequently, Leontiev depicts particular stages of the evolution of this power model in Russia. The author of the paper concludes that the thinker’s considerations are centered on the emphasis on the role of monarchy in contemporary Russia rather than on its Byzantine roots.

3

Problem obcości: opozycja Rosja–Europa w kulturze rosyjskiej (XI–XIX w.)

71%

Jedliński M.

Kultury Wschodniosłowiańskie - Oblicza i Dialog

|

2016

|

issue 6

83-96

EN

The article analyzes the historical perspective of the formation of the opposition “friend or foe” in the Russian culture from the Middle Ages to the 19th century. Binary thinking has a universal dimension: it is present in every culture, particularly in traditional societies (in this case it is the opposition Russia–Europe). Hostility towards strangers is already noticeable in the Ruthenian tribes. The outsiders were seen as savages, as animals, and even as evil forces. It relates to the perception of the symbolic center of the world. It is recognizable in the work of Hilarion and the concept of Moscow as the Third Rome.

PL

The article analyzes the historical perspective of the formation of the opposition “friend or foe” in the Russian culture from the Middle Ages to the 19th century. Binary thinking has a universal dimension: it is present in every culture, particularly in traditional societies (in this case it is the opposition Russia–Europe). Hostility towards strangers is already noticeable in the Ruthenian tribes. The outsiders were seen as savages, as animals, and even as evil forces. It relates to the perception of the symbolic center of the world. It is recognizable in the work of Hilarion and the concept of Moscow as the Third Rome.

Refine search results

2 Kultury Wschodniosłowiańskie - Oblicza i Dialog

1 Cywilizacja i Polityka

1 Bala M.

1 Jedliński M.

1 Karolak-Michalska M.

3 2016

O podziałach we współczesnej Ukrainie

Tradycja bizantyjska i jej wpływ na kulturę rosyjską w myśli Konstantina Leontjewa

Problem obcości: opozycja Rosja–Europa w kulturze rosyjskiej (XI–XIX w.)