Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  kulturní války
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
In the Czech appropriation of the literary genre splatterpunk, political correctness, or more precisely the lack of it, occupies a prominent place. Fascination with so-called ‘incorrectness’ can be understood to be a special case of what Richard Burt identifes as ‘the fetish of censorship’ with writers drawing from the appeal of such ‘forbidden’ topics as racial and gender stereotypes. Tis paper examines the ways in which the criticism of correctness plays out in diferent forms of paratexts, such as ads, reviews, and interviews with writers. Te analysis of Czech splatterpunk novels and short stories reveals what is actually understood as ‘incorrect’ in terms of literary fction, and how those texts, featuring primarily white masculine heroes with indestructible bodies, lend themselves to diferent kinds of readings: from sharp political satire to self-refective spectacular grotesque.
2
Content available remote

Náboženská svoboda v krizi

80%
EN
Political crises are moments of redefinition of deeply fixed meanings of concepts. In the context of the so-called “culture wars”, the issue whether religious liberty should be guaranteed as a free-standing constitutional right has arisen.Many authors have challenged the singling out and constitutional preference for religious liberty. Probably the most sophisticated argument until now has been offered by Brian Leiter, the professor of Jurisprudence at the University of Chicago, whose book has also been positively mentioned in our country. This article is discussing the persuasiveness of Leiter’s conception of religious liberty. It reviews his conceptualization of religion, the arguments for tolerating religion and the place of religion in constitutional democracy. Taking into account the Czech historical experience, it shows many problems of Leiter’s conception, which eventually must be seen as much less persuasive as it seemed at first sight.
CS
Politické krize jsou momenty, kdy se redefinují ustálené významy termínů. V kontextu tzv. kulturních válek se vynořila otázka, zda by měla být náboženská svoboda garantována jako samostatné ústavní právo. Mnozí autoři se proti tomuto vyčlenění a preferování vymezují. Zatím asi nejpropracovanější pokus nabídl chicagský profesor právní vědy Brian Leiter, jehož knize se dostalo pozitivní reference i v naší zemi. Tento článek se pokouší diskutovat přesvědčivost Leiterovy koncepce. Rozebírá jeho pojetí náboženství, důvody pro toleranci náboženství a postavení náboženství v ústavní demokracii. Upozorňuje na mnohé problémy Leiterovy koncepce, která se i na základě naší zkušenosti musí jevit jako daleko méně přesvědčivá, než by se na první pohled mohlo zdát.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.