Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  language teaching methods
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The author states that progressive scholars have seen in the native language the source and the formation of children’s abilities, expand their knowledge of the objects of the world. They opposed scholasticism and dogmatism in the study of the Russian language, the suppression of the students living thought, emphasized the need for age-appropriate children, advocated the teaching relationship with life and insisted on the inclusion in the program on national language only the most important and necessary. The objectives and content of language teaching in the modern school, as well as principles of modern textbooks and manuals are rooted in the tradition of the Russian progressive techniques, whose founders were F. Buslaev, K. Ushinsky, I. Sreznevsky. The article discusses the basic principles of vocabulary learning (system, science, communication theory and practice, the principle of developmental education, unity of form and content) proposed by F. Buslaev, K. Ushinsky, I. Sreznevsky in papers on teaching the Russian language, their views on language teaching methods (conversation, semantic analysis of the text, followed by drawing up the plan, various types of vocabulary exercises aimed at understanding and activation in speech and writing lexical units), which are fundamental in modern methods of teaching the Russian vocabulary. The author stresses that F. Buslayev is an eminent linguist and literary critic, founder of the first Russian historical grammar, the author of the first work, which started the methods of teaching Russian – «On Teaching the national language». He recommended to work on lexical concept in the school course of the Russian language in the middle of the nineteenth century. He first proclaimed the principle of a comprehensive study of the language. It is noted that I. Sreznevsky identified such basic methodological principles as the principle of developmental education, the principle of age-appropriate, unity of form and content, system, and the relevance of particular consciousness, development of linguistic intuition, the selection of words for the accurate transmission of shades of meaning. K. Ushinsky believed that education can fulfill its task only under three conditions: 1) it is associated with life; 2) the training shall be constructed in accordance with the nature of the child; 3) teaching should be conducted in the native language of the students.
EN
The article focuses on the problem of language errors that – more often than not – still tends to be regarded as a marginal phenomenon which does not deserve any particular attention. An attempt is made at analyzing the concept of a language error and tracking the approach to it adopted in selected language teaching methods, arriving finally at the language error theory in modern language teaching.
EN
This article traces the development of views on the use of L1 in teaching EFL. It attempts to discover why many teachers feel the guilt they claim to feel when they use L1 in the EFL classroom. Two possible causes are identified — the Reform Movement and, in the local context, the specific nature of the ELT situation and language market in the post-1989 period in Czechoslovakia. The article advocates the use of L1 provided that use is systematic and follows clear guidelines. In addition, it calls for debate on what these guidelines should be.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.