Search results

1

Zanik procesu deszyfracji normy a jej obowiązywanie w sensie faktycznym

100%

Piwowarczyk W., Słupski J.

Rocznik Kognitywistyczny

|

2011

|

vol. 5

151-158

EN

The article is an analysis of the language of legal norms in the context of its cognitive value, with an assumption that currently created norms are gradually deprived of their intelligibility towards the norm’s addressees, being in fact addressed directly to lawyers. Moreover, authors claim that there is a growing trend in the lawmaking process to create law which, in order to be applied, needs to be supplied with information from other genres of knowledge, external to law. In order to describe this phenomenon they introduce a new term, the “specialized norm”, and, through investigation of specific legal cases, they prove significance of the issue. By means of concepts deriving from philosophy of law and theory of language, the paper points out a strengthening tendency in legislative process, which forces one to ask themselves certain basic questions of nature and purpose of the law.

2

Opinia prawna w sprawie zakresu uprawnień przedstawiciela Komisji Ustawodawczej w pracach innych komisji nad projektem ustawy – według pytań szczegółowych

100%

Chybalski P.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2014

|

issue 2(42)

76-83

EN

The Deputy who represents the Legislative Committee may participate in the legislative work of a subcommittee set up within another committee but, then, he/she has the status of “regular” Deputy who is not a member of that subcommittee. The author stresses that the status of the representative of the Legislative Committee is specified by the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Moreover, he points out that the Deputy who is both a representative of the Legislative Committee and a member of the committee appropriate for the bill, cannot participate in voting on motions and amendments, which he/she submitted, acting as a representative of the Legislative Committee. There are no obstacles for the Deputy to participate in other votings. During the work of the committee, it should be determined in each case whether the Deputy fulfilling the two above‑mentioned functions acts in the capacity of a member of the committee, or as a representative of the Legislative Committee.

3

Opinia prawna w sprawie autopoprawki do poselskiego projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy o świadczeniach rodzinnych oraz ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych

88%

Chybalski P.

Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

|

2013

|

issue 4(40)

96-101

EN

The author discusses formal aspects of constitutionality of an amendment introduced by a sponsor of the bill amending the Act on Family Benefits and the Act on the System of Social Insurances. It is concluded that requirements, developed by the Constitutional Tribunal, concerning the proper subject matter of amendments, do not apply to amendments introduced by a sponsor of a bill, according to Article 36 paras. 1a–1c of the Standing Orders of the Sejm. Thus, the assessed amendment is constitutionally admissible.

Refine search results

2 Zeszyty Prawnicze BAS

1 Rocznik Kognitywistyczny

2 Chybalski P.

1 Piwowarczyk W.

1 Słupski J.

1 2014

1 2013

1 2012

Zanik procesu deszyfracji normy a jej obowiązywanie w sensie faktycznym

Opinia prawna w sprawie zakresu uprawnień przedstawiciela Komisji Ustawodawczej w pracach innych komisji nad projektem ustawy – według pytań szczegółowych

Opinia prawna w sprawie autopoprawki do poselskiego projektu ustawy o zmianie ustawy o świadczeniach rodzinnych oraz ustawy o systemie ubezpieczeń społecznych