Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  lexicographical criticism
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Ekwiwalent zerowy w polsko-rosyjskiej leksykografii par przekładowych (na materiale 8. zeszytu „Podręcznego idiomatykonu polsko-rosyjskiego”)

100%
Gasek B.
Applied Linguistics Papers
|
2019
|
issue 26/1
1-14
EN
Present article demonstrates analysis results of ways of presenting non-equivalent phrases in the „Podręczny idiomatykon polsko-rosyjski, z. 8” by Wojciech Chlebda. The author discusses the po-ssibility of modification and further improvement of some dictionary entries and also the usage of Ø symbol in other dictionaries. The analysis conducted by the author of the present article shows that Ø symbol is used in present dictionary in three cases: literal translation of the original unit with the recom-mended use of such phrases as «какговорятвПольше», «какгласитпольскаяпоговорка», for in-stance, kto “wygląda jak pączek w maśle” Ø [ктовыглядиткакпончиквмасле]; replacing the equiva-lent with some sort of definition, for instance, becikowe pot. Ø [одноразовоепособиедляноворождённого]; transcribing the initial unit and explaining its meaning in post-text comment, for in-stance, “szmalcownik” Ø [шмальцовник]. Result of the analysis allows us to conclude that Ø symbol must be considered as ‘needed’ in translated lexicography. On the other hand, its practical usage in a present dictionary prompts some doubts. Thus, in some cases literal translation can be used as equivalent, for instance, “urlop ojcowski отцовскийотпуск”. Apart from this, it appears to the author of the article that for approximately 10 initial units there are Russian translation equivalents, for instance, “biuro ka-rier“ [na uczelni] ros. “Центрразвитиякарьеры“/ “Центркарьеры“ or “damski bokser“ “кухонныйбоксёр“/ “кухонныйбоец/ кухонныйвоин“.
2

Rosyjskie nazwy realiów w ujęciu leksykograficzno-przekładowym

63%
Gasek B.
Slavica Wratislaviensia
|
2016
|
vol. 162
111 - 122
EN
The article discusses dictionary search methods and translation equivalents concerning Russian language realia. A critical analysis is conducted on the resources included in The Great Russian-Polish Dictionary edited by Jan Wawrzyńczyk. Inaccuracies found in dictionary entries, as well as inaccuracies in the choice of equivalence, allow us to formulate some conclusions about suitable methods to present realia in amodern Russian-Polish translation dictionary.
3

Polisemia jako problem w rosyjsko-polskiej leksykografi i przekładowej

51%
Gasek B.
Slavica Wratislaviensia
|
2017
|
vol. 164
103-115
EN
The article discusses the problem of polysemy in translation of Russian-Polish dictionary. Critical analysis was conducted on the resources included in The Great Russian-Polish Dictionary edited by “Wydawnictwo PWN”. Inaccuracies and mistakes found in dictionary entries allow us to formulate some conclusions about principles for compiling modern Russian-Polish dictionary, which meets translator’s expectations.
RU
В настоящей статье рассматривается проблема презентации полисемии в большом русско-польском переводном словаре. В ходе анализа Большого русско-польского словаря под редакцией Яна Вавжинчика были выявлены ошибки и недочёты в построении отдель- ных статей, а также — сделаны выводы насчёт принципов составления современного рус- ско-польского словаря, соответствующего требованиям переводчика.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.