Recent fMRI research suggests that at least some patients diagnosed as being in the permanent vegetative state can be more aware than it was previously thought. In this paper I briefly discuss the aforementioned research; then I consider to which of several kinds of consciousness they appeal to; and finally I analyze the ethical implications of these findings. In particular I consider whether having higher forms of consciousness must always be an additional reason against the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment. In my paper I also highlight the general importance of cognitive science for the ethical evaluations of some medical practices.
Tekst nawiązuje do internetowej dyskusji pt. „O racjonalne decyzje w opiece neonatalnej”, odbytej w dniach 15. 09.-15. 10. 2012 r. na stronie Polskiego Towarzystwa Bioetycznego. Uzasadniam w nim trzy postulaty: (I) propozycję zdefiniowania grupy noworodków krytycznie chorych jako pacjentów, u których niepodjęcie lub zaprzestanie leczenia przedłużającego życie będzie działaniem etycznie usprawiedliwionym, (II) objęcia tą kategorią wszystkich pięciu sytuacji wymienionych w dokumencie Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health Withholding or Withdrawing Life Sustaining Treatment in Children. A Framework for Practice z 2004 r., (III) postulat zagwarantowania rodzicom noworodków krytycznie chorych nie tylko moralnej, ale także prawnej możliwość niezgody na leczenie przedłużające życie tych dzieci.
EN
The article is a follow-up to an online debate, “On Rational Decision Making in Neonatal Care”, which was held within between 15th September and 15th October 2012 on the website of the Polish Bioethics Society. In it I provide justifications for the following three proposals: (I) the creation of a category for critically ill infants as patients in whose case withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment would be a morally justified action, (II) that this category subsume all the five cases mentioned in the document of the Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health, entitled Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatment in Children. A Framework for Practice (2004), and (III) that parents of critically ill infants be provided not only the moral, but also the legal possibility of refusing life-sustaining treatment.
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.