Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  literary structure
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
This study focuses on a particular distinctive moment in the Czech and French historyof literary thinking which took place in the latter half of the 1960s and which saw not only an encounter of Marxism and structuralism, but also a shift and radical change in the conception of literary structure. Marxist philosopher and historian Robert Kalivodapresents the development of Jan Mukařovský´s structural literary aesthetics from a Marxist and Freudian perspective ; according to him, Mukařovský´s conception matured - in association with the production and reflection of the interwar artistic avant-garde (Karel Teige) - towards a conception of aesthetic function and value as transparent anthropic principles and work of art as a dynamic ensemble of extra-aesthetic functions and values. Simultaneously, the representative of French Althusserian Marxism Pierre Macherey formulates his conception of literary output as a specific mode in the production of speech and literary structure as a space of difference, in which the ideological universalizations of the period are unconsciously presented in a critical light. Within the Czech structuralist tradition - and in harmony with its avant-garde pedigree - a parallel conception then emerges within the works of Oleg Sus and Milan Jankovič of literary structure as a structure that is unconsolidated and unconsolidatable, as the process and action of meaning, the movement of contradictions that will not have culminated in a final and completed synthesis. Analysis of the internal contexts and interrelations of these conceptions leads us to interpret them as the movement of concurrent misses - a radical change in the structure and the opening of its dialectics here has different resonances, caused by a different conception of the subject and the relationship between the work and the social structure - and also a failed meeting, whose connections have for the most part hitherto escaped the attention of literary studies and philosophy historians.
The Biblical Annals
|
2023
|
vol. 13
|
issue 3
395-417
EN
This article discusses the literary structure of the flood account (1 En. 89:1b–9) in the Animal Apocalypse (1 En. 85–90). Since the Qumran Aramaic text of the story (4Q206 frags. 8 I and 9) has preserved a shorter text than that found in the ancient Ethiopic version, the study of the literary additions found therein is also undertaken. Although the Aramaic text of the flood account is not free from some redactional elaborations of the literary structure of the story, the literary additions in the Ethiopic version expand the shorter structure, especially in the first part of the account (strophes 2–4). The insertion of new cosmic elements into the story (heavenly roof and earthly enclosure) creates a well-circumscribed space where the punishment of humanity, sons of the Watchers and animals by the waters of the flood takes place (strophe 4). Thus, the Ethiopic longer recension of the flood account is far more distant from the shorter text of 4Q206. The last part of this study takes a closer look at the literary context of the flood story that closes the first part of the Animal Apocalypse (1 En. 85:3b–89:9) and preannounces its second section (1 En. 89:10–90:19) marred by the shedding of blood and violence between the nations and Israel.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Kompozycja literacka Sdz 1

100%
The Biblical Annals
|
1989
|
vol. 36
|
issue 1
5-15
PL
The article considers Jg. 1 as a separate pericope. Its detailed analysis from the point of view of literary structure and sources used in the composition of the text leads to the following conclusions. The content of the text makes it possible to distinguish two main traditions, vv. 2-20.36 and vv. 21-27. 29-35, supplemented with editorial comments of a fairly late date (vv. 1. 28). The traditions differ as to their literary genre. The information contained in Jg. 1 mostly dates back to the times of the judges. The editorial work is marked by respect for old documents, which results in some inconsistencies and breaks in the flow of the narrative. The distinctive nature of much of the information in either tradition suggests that an editor from Judah was responsible for the final form of Jg. 1.
The Biblical Annals
|
1988
|
vol. 35
|
issue 1
101-116
PL
St. Stephen’s speech (Ac. 7, 2-53) is among the more difficult texts in the Acts; this can be gathered from the many disagreements among commentators. One of the disputed points concerns its literary composition, its internal literary structure. Most writers have not attached much importance to the problem, judging the chronology to constitute a sufficient criterion for the division of the speech. Representatives of the formgeschichte school, who have concentrated on the study of the deep structure of the tact (diachronic analysis), neglected the question of its literary composition. Yet current research shows ever more forcefully that Stephen’s speech needs to be studied also from the viewpoint of its literary and theological unity (synchronic analysis). This is so because the speech has a logical and purposely designed internal structure, a literary structure. It is the aim of this article to discover that internal structure. Apart from chronological and thematic criteria we have taken into account also the linguistic and stylistic characteristics of the speech. Our study reveals that the first major part of the speech coven the earliest history of Israel, from Abraham until the death of the last of Jacob’s sons (w. 2-16). The next part concentrates solely on the events of Moses’ life (w. 17-36); a noteworthy point about this part is its emphatic conclusion, where Moses is proclaimed to be the liberator of Israel (w. 35-36). The third part of the speech is more varied in content, but the theme of the people and their attitude towards Moses and towards religious cult is dominant (w. 37-50). Particularly remarkable is the beginning of this part, which is introduced by the promise of the coming of another prophet like Moses (v. 37), a point that has a variety of important justifications. The speech doses with violent invective against the Jews (w. 51-53). This final invective stands in contrast to the other three parts of the speech; at the same time, however, there is an interdependence here, based on shared themes and motifs (w. 2-50, 51-53).
The Biblical Annals
|
2005
|
vol. 52
|
issue 1
5-21
PL
The paper consists of two parts. The first one proposes a literary structure of the text Deut 32, pinpointing the element which seems to a bearer of its leading theological idea. This element has been found in line 31. The second part of the paper analyses the contents of the whole pericope, focusing on its main theological message, i.e. the uniqueness of Jhwh.
The Biblical Annals
|
1980
|
vol. 27
|
issue 1
81-91
PL
Der Artikel hat zum Gegenstand die Absonderung der Strukturelementen von der Perikope J 11,1-44 und Bestimmung ihrer theologischen Funktion. Der Verfasser stützt sich auf den Kriterien von Aktionsort, Wortschatz und Gegenwirkung der Zeugen des Ereignisses, und kommt zum Schluss, dass im Zentrum der Erzählung das Gespräch Jesu mit Martha sich befindet, und Jesus ist als Auferstehung und Leben dargestellt. Das Lazarus Fortgehen aus dem Grabe ist eine Exemplifikation der Jesu eigentümlichen Kraft als Lebengebers und Auferstehungsstifters. Die ganze Perikope J 11,1-44, erfüllt mit dem Krankheits-, Tod-, und Grabwortschatz, ist von der Darstellung Jesu als Lebens und Auferstehung beherrscht.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.