Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Refine search results

Journals help

  1. 1 Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia

Years help

  1. 1 2006

Authors help

  1. 1 Sikora M.

Results found: 1

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  method of science
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Content available remote

Konstruktywizm i realizm wobec statusu faktów naukowych. Bruno Latour a Ian Hacking

100%
Sikora M.
Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia
|
2006
|
vol. 1
|
issue 1
11-26
EN
The paper addresses one of most important topics in contemporary epistemology, i.e. the controversy between realistic vs. constructivist approach to reality and science. In my article I focus on two representatives of these approaches, on Ian Hacking's realistic view of knowledge, and on Bruno Latour's radical constructivism. In the first part, Latour's idea of anthropological research of the method of sciences is discussed. I argue that Latour's conception boils down to an assertion against there being an universal method of science. In second part I discuss realistic standpoint of Ian Hacking and his view that not all scientific facts are theoretical constructions.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.