Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 2

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  mythe
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Celem artykułu jest analiza sztuki Matéi Visnieca Hécatombéon, stanowiącej współczesną wersję mitu o Prometeuszu, w porównaniu do utworu Ajschylosa Prometeusz w okowach, co pozwala zaobserwować interesujący dialog, jaki nawiązuje się między hipotekstem a hipertekstem. Opierając się la terminologii zaproponowanej przez Gerarda Genetta, analiza ukazuje sposób, w jaki dokonują się rożnego rodzaju transformacje na poziomie hipertekstu, i proponuje nowe odczytanie sztuki Ajschylosa przez pryzmat hipertekstu.
EN
The aim of this article is to analyze the play by Matéi Visniec Hécatombéon, a contemporary variation on the myth of Prometheus, in comparison with Aeschylus’ drama Prometheus Bound, allowing us to observe an interesting dialogue that is developed between the hypotext and the hypertext. Applying the terminology of G. Genette, the analysis seeks to observe how different kinds of transformations present in the hypertext are made, and then to consider a new possible reading of the old text.
FR
Cet article se propose d’analyser la pièce de Matéi Visniec Hécatombéon, variation contemporaine sur le mythe de Prométhée, par rapport à l’œuvre d’Eschyle Prométhée enchaîné, ce qui permettra d’observer le dialogue intéressant qui s’instaure entre l’hypotexte et l’hypertexte. En appliquant la terminologie de G. Genette, l’analyse a pour objectif d’observer comment s’opèrent les différents types de transformations présentes dans l’hypertexte pour ensuite envisager une nouvelle lecture possible du texte ancien à travers le prisme de l’hypertexte.
EN
This paper attempts to cross-read the End of Art as it is conceptualized by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, and André Gide’s and Jean Lorrain’s versions of the myth of Narcissus. The most relevant mythemes such as beauty, self-love, duplication, “specularity” and death are apprehended in their recovery by fin-de-siècle aesthetics. The hermeneutic back-and-forth movement between the two texts assesses the structural symbols carrying various models of the evolution of art and formulates what Hegel could have possibly understood by this concept. The results of our interpretation are then related to certain phenomena of the history of art, and particularly of literature in the 20th century.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.