Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 7

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  narody
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
PL
Pierwszym traktatem pokojowym w I wojnie światowej był separatystyczny traktat Rosji bolszewickiej z państwami centralnymi. Zawarty został 3 marca 1918 r. w Brześciu Litewskim. Już 13 listopada 1918 r. Rosja bolszewicka wypowiedziała separatystyczny traktat brzeski. Armia Czerwona ruszyła na zachód. Celem było zaniesienie rewolucji komunistycznej do Niemiec i innych krajów.
EN
The first peace treaty in World War I was the separatist treaty between Bolshevik Russia and the Central Powers. It was concluded on March 3, 1918 in Brest Litovsk (Brześć Litewski). On November 13, 1918 Bolshevik Russia terminated the separatist Treaty of Brest-Litovsk. The Red Army started moving west. The aim was to introduce the communist revolution to Germany and other countries.
2
100%
PL
Recenzja książki: Biblia o odkupieniu (red. R. Rubinkiewicz) (Lublin: RW KUL 2000). Ss. 201. ISBN 83-228-0630-2.
EN
In this paper I write about two counterculture utopias: the vision contained in the songs of Lennon's Imagine and an extremely extensive synthesis Jeremy Rifkin, in which mirror neurons and – based on them – empathy play a leading role. I start with a presentation and a comparative analysis of these utopias. The first can be seen as a version of "mini", other than as a version of "maxi" similar worldview. This worldview is a synthesis of the hippie counterculture and the "new left" and can be described as the ideology of "political correctness". In conclusion, I will add a few critical remarks. Above all, I pointed out the serious consequences of the vision of a united humanity, deprived of property, national states and institutional religion.
4
84%
EN
The article compares the views of the Polish philosopher of civilisation, Feliks Koneczny with the American political philosopher and political scientist, Francis Fukuyama. Koneczny is a conservative, while Fukuyama is a liberal, but there are great similarities in their concepts of the world’s major civilisations. Their views on national identity are also similar. The author considers Koneczny’s concept of pluralism of civilisations compared to Fukuyama’s concept of unification of the world by liberal democracy as the main difference between the two scholars.
PL
Artykuł porównuje poglądy polskiego filozofa cywilizacji Feliksa Konecznego z amerykańskim filozofem politycznym i politologiem Francisem Fukuyamą. Koneczny jest konserwatystą, a Fukuyama liberałem, jednak istnieją duże podobieństwa w ich koncepcjach głównych cywilizacji świata. Zbliżone są także ich poglądy na tożsamość narodową. Za główną różnicę między oboma badaczami autor uznaje koncepcję pluralizmu cywilizacji Konecznego w porównaniu z koncepcję Fukuyamy – unifikacji świata przez liberalną demokrację.
PL
The article tries to describe the theology of David’s testimony in Isaiah55:3-5 in light of its historical background, to wit the last decade of theBabylonian exile, and in relation to the internal quandary of Judean Exiles.The study undertakes an inquiry into the question of whether the eternalcovenant in Isaiah 55:3-5 is the continuation of the Sinaitic Covenant, orrather does its content go beyond the Mosaic Law, creating a totally newrelationship of God with Israel. The study also draws attention to the existenceof a redactional addition, which swifts the weight of the originalmessage from a revanchist Judeo-centrism toward the irenic ethnic-centrismtypical of the Book of Jonah.
|
2017
|
vol. 7
|
issue 1
49-85
EN
The article proposes a new translation and interpretation of the messianic prophecy in Isa. 55:1-7, whose vv. 3-5 are thoroughly analyzed. The analysis includes not only the meaning of the individual words, but also the syntactic situation of the whole sentences. It was taken into account the problem of the historical context in which Deutero-Isaiah lived, worked and preached his message. This survey is designed to obtain a better understanding of the periscope, a more consistent translation and structure of the whole passage. The study undertakes an inquiry into the question of whether the eternal covenant in Isa. 55:1-7 is the continuation of the Sinaitic Covenant, or rather does its content go beyond the Mosaic Law, creating a totally new relationship of God with Israel. The study also draws attention to the existence of a redactional addition, which shifts the weight of the original message from a revanchist Judeocentrism toward the irenic ethnocentrism typical of the Book of Jonah
PL
Abstract: The article proposes a new translation and interpretation of the messianic prophecy in Isa. 55:1-7, whose vv. 3-5 are thoroughly analyzed. The analysis includes not only the meaning of the individual words, but also the syntactic situation of the whole sentences. It was taken into account the problem of the historical context in which Deutero-Isaiah lived, worked and preached his message. This survey is designed to obtain a better understanding of the periscope, a more consistent translation and structure of the whole passage. The study undertakes an inquiry into the question of whether the eternal covenant in Isa. 55:1-7 is the continuation of the Sinaitic Covenant, or rather does its content go beyond the Mosaic Law, creating a totally new relationship of God with Israel. The study also draws attention to the existence of a redactional addition, which shifts the weight of the original message from a revanchist Judeocentrism toward the irenic ethnocentrism typical of the Book of Jonah.      
EN
The article tries to describe the theology of David’s testimony in Isaiah 55:3-5 in light of its historical background, to wit the last decade of the Babylonian exile, and in relation to the internal quandary of Judean Exiles. The study undertakes an inquiry into the question of whether the eternal covenant in Isaiah 55:3-5 is the continuation of the Sinaitic Covenant, or rather does its content go beyond the Mosaic Law, creating a totally new relationship of God with Israel. The study also draws attention to the existence of a redactional addition, which shifts the weight of the original message from a revanchist Judeo-centrism toward the irenic ethno-centrism typical of the Book of Jonah.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.