Search results

1

Znaczenie marburskiej szkoły neokantyzmu dla polskiej teorii i filozofii prawa

100%

Pikuła Ł. J.

Estetyka i Krytyka

|

2012

|

issue 4(26)

109-117

XX

The article is a continuation of the author’s research in the field of the idea of positive just law, conducted as part of a philosophy of law seminar. The author intends to outline his findings in the form of a book, which currently is in statu nascendi.

2

H. Cohens Ethik und ihre Rezeption in der russischen Philosophie des Rechts

70%

Belov V.

IDEA. Studia nad strukturą i rozwojem pojęć filozoficznych

|

2015

|

vol. 27

373-381

EN

The article draws attention to one remarkable feature in the perception of the Hermann Cohen doctrine in Russia, namely special attention on the part of Russian philosophers of the twentieth century to the turn of the ethical theories of the founder of the Marburg school of neo-Kantianism. In Russia, the most representative approach to the analysis of Cohen’s ethical theories is one conducted from the perspective of the philosophy of law. Ethical theories of the Marburg philosopher were in the center of scientific debate of the most famous Russian theorists of law – P.I. Novgorodtsev, B.A. Kistyakovsky, E.V. Spektorsky. The appeal rights of Russian theorists to analyze ethical problems Cohen highlighted the relation of law and morality. The central theme of the arguments in this respect was the theme of ethics orientation of the Marburg philosopher on jurisprudence. Of particular importance in view of the historicist and positivist tendencies that prevailed at the end of the 19th century in legal science in Russia, was rehabilitation of Cohen’s and his followers’ the concept of “natural law”. The main drawback of the criticism coming from Russian theorists of law in relation to Cohen is that their approach to the ideas of this great German thinker is not systematic enough, attempting to consider their ethical views independently from other parts of their philosophical constructions.

3

Pojęcie samoświadomości w filozofii świadomości Paula Natorpa

70%

Noras A. J.

Folia Philosophica

|

2014

|

vol. 32

PL

The paper aims at presenting Paul Natorp’s views on consciousness discussed on historical and systematic plane. In the former case understanding of consciousness and self-consciousness is discussed in the context of Cohen’s views. In the latter the problem is conceived in the light of evolution of both concepts in Natorp.

4

Neokantyzm Fiodora Stiepuna

70%

Ziomek M.

Estetyka i Krytyka

|

2012

|

issue 4(26)

287-294

XX

In this article I attempt to analyse Fyodor Stepun’s philosophical essay Life and Creative Activity. This treatise is in fact the thinker’s only strictly philosophical work. In his works the Russian philosopher frequently stressed the role and importance of Immanuel Kant in the development of philosophy, yet he suggested the necessity of going beyond the limits of critical philosophy. As the author intended, the essay Life and Creative Activity was the first attempt to sketch a philosophical system, which would attempt to defend and justify the idea of religious philosophy on the grounds of critical philosophy. In my article I try to describe Stepun’s philosophical idea (the philosophy of absolute) which is based on the analysis of the concept of mystical experience, whose two poles are: life (experiencing unity) and creative work (experiencing multiplicity).

5

Znaniecki’s Key Insight: The Merger of Pragmatism and Neo-Kantianism

61%

Wiley N.

Polish Sociological Review

|

2007

|

vol. 158

|

issue 2

133-144

EN

Znaniecki is difficult to classify theoretically, which may be why his ideas and writings have been neglected. He is a central and perhaps the central figure in American sociological theory. This is because he clarified the sense in which the social is symbolic. In addition his pioneering analysis of ethnic prejudice and racism makes him a central figure in the American reform tradition. The key to understanding his theoretical power is in his having fused or merged neo-Kantianism and pragmatism. This paper explains how Znaniecki achieved this highly creative feat and what consequences it led to.

6

Johannes Volkelt a problem metafizyki

61%

Kubalica T.

Estetyka i Krytyka

|

2012

|

issue 4(26)

27-49

XX

The aim of the paper is a historical analysis and evaluate of the metaphysic of neo-Kantian philosopher Johannes Volkelt and of post-neo-Kantian Martin Heidegger. Heidegger’s approach to Kant’s critique of pure reason (transcendental philosophy) as the foundation of metaphysics is not new and it had a major precursor in the metaphysical neo-Kantianism. In the neo-Kantianism was taken inside the question of the possibility of metaphysics, not only as metaphysica specialis, but also as the ontology (metaphysica generalis).

7

Neokrytyczna gnoseologia szkoły marburskiej Ujęcie Paula Natorpa

61%

Musioł A. A.

Folia Philosophica

|

2014

|

vol. 32

PL

The paper presents epistemological project of philosophy by Paul Natorp in the context of Marburg School of neo-Kantianism. I take into account not only intellectual atmosphere of the department of philosophy at the University of Marburg, but also its influence on the character of Natorp’s works, changing characteristics of his presuppositions-hypotheses and the way of argumentation for them. Paying attention to strong influence of Immanuel Kant, and especially his transcendental logic, I disclose the differences emerging between Natorp’s programme of philosophy and the rules of neo-Kantianism set originally by Hermann Cohen.

8

Rosyjski wariant neokantyzmu i postneokantyzmu

61%

Czardybon B.

Estetyka i Krytyka

|

2012

|

issue 4(26)

237-257

XX

The fundamental ideas of philosophical conceptions of Alexander I. Vvedensky (1856–1925) and Vasily E. Sesemann (1884–1963), philosophers representing the Russian variant of neo-Kantianism and post-neo-Kantianism, are discussing in this article. Particular attention is focused on the theory of “Logism” and the problem of what is irrational. According to Vvedensky, only logic, which is a part of epistemology, answers the crucial question to Criticism of the limits of knowledge. The Russian neo-Kantian philosopher negates the possibility of scientific metaphysics and at the same time he deems the metaphysical truths as a matter of faith; metaphysics as “morally founded belief” is an essential component of a harmonious world outlook. Sesemann, as a Russian post-neo-Kantian, stresses the limitations of natural-scientific model of cognition and a logical approach, and also assigns new meaning to the concepts of what rational and irrational.

9

Max Brod - Felix Weltsch: Anschauung und Begriff : Grundzüge eines Systems der Begriffsbildung

51%

Vrtílka P.

Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)

|

2019

|

vol. 67

|

issue 1

121-133

EN

This review study is concerned with the recently published second edition of the philosophical work Anschauung und Begriff. Grundzüge eines Systems der Begriffsbildung, the authors of which are members of the “narrow” Prague Circle: Max Brod and Felix Weltsch. They themselves characterise their work as a “monograph about vague ideas”. A salient feature of their theory is the attempt to determine afresh the relation between intuition and concept, reflecting the ideas of the time in philosophy and experimental psychology. The authors are of the opinion that in the sphere of the vague and uncertain, there appear certain observable connecting links: these are intuitive concepts which lack any role in the formation of a scientific concept as it is understood in the neo-Kantian tradition. Study of this work contributes to our understanding of the historical reception of Brentanism in the context of the intellectual milieu of Prague at the time, which was characterised by an overt interplay between Prague German philosophy and literature.

DE

Die vorliegende Rezensionsstudie ist der aktuellen zweiten Ausgabe des philosophischen Werks Anschauung und Begriff. Grundzüge eines Systems der Begriffsbildung gewidmet, dessen Autoren, Max Brod und Felix Weltsch, Mitglieder des engeren Prager Kreises waren. Diese bezeichneten ihr Werk selbst als „Monographie über verschwommene Vorstellungen“. Ein wichtiger Grundzug ihrer Theorie ist die Bemühung um eine neue Bestimmung der Beziehung von Anschauung und Begriff, in der zeitgenössische Denkströmungen der Philosophie und der experimentellen Psychologie reflektiert werden. Die Autoren vermuten, dass in der Sphäre des Vagen und Unbestimmten gewisse beobachtbare Zwischenglieder entstehen, d. h. Meinungsbegriffe, die nicht im Zusammenhang mit der Bildung des wissenschaftlichen Begriffs stehen, so wie er im Neukantismus aufgefasst wird. Interessant ist ein Studium dieses Werks hinsichtlich der Rezeptionsgeschichte des Brentanismus im Kontext des damaligen intellektuellen Umfelds Prags, in den nachweislichen Beziehungen zwischen der deutschen Philosophie und Literatur in Prag bestanden.

10

An existential conception of culture

41%

Bowler M.

Studia Philosophiae Christianae

|

2013

|

vol. 49

|

issue 4

9-24

EN

This paper articulates an existential conception of culture using as an analogy the existential conception of science as formulated by Heidegger. As with the existential conception of science, the existential conception of culture corresponds to a mode of existence of Dasein. This distinguishes the existential conception of culture from other prevalent notions of culture that view culture as present-at-hand or ready-to-hand. However culture is not simply a mode of Dasein’s existence.It is a mode of existence that discloses that very mode of existence. More precisely, in culture Dasein discloses its very being by concretely working it out. Moreover, it is argued that the task of culture is to exist in such a way that one realizes values in an uncommon manner.

11

Miejsce krytycznej filozofii Immanuela Kanta i neokantyzmu Hermanna Cohena w refleksji Stanisława Leopolda Brzozowskiego

41%

Musioł A. A.

Folia Philosophica

|

2018

|

vol. 40

EN

In the article, I want to describe the place of Immanuel Kant and Hermann Cohen’s Neo-Kantianism in the thought of Stanisław L. Brzozowski philosophy. So the critical image of philosophy is showing the project of Kant, so the concept of Cohen is - how Brzozowski thinks - with an expression of truly independent reflection. In the system of Cohen, author Legenda Młodej Polski…, a tendency to intellectual initiative free from positivist and modernist restrictions notices. How the history of philosophy is showing, both favored German classics of transcendental method, freedoms treat the criticism as a contemporary concept and innovative original thought. Meanwhile, for Brzozowski, criticism is an opportunity for including the philosophy of Kant into the form of the summons to the creative bravery, and it all at the same time is also Marburg doctrine, in accordance which is an existence missing apart from becoming eternal and ceaseless (eternal fieri).

PL

W artykule dokonuję próby wskazania miejsca jakie w filozofii Stanisława L. Brzozowskiego zajmuje myśl Immanuela Kanta oraz neokantowski system Hermanna Cohena. O ile krytyczny obraz filozofii przedstawia, wedle polskiego myśliciela, projekt Kanta, o tyle koncepcja Cohena jest wyrazem w pełni samodzielnej i niezależnej refleksji. W systemie Cohena, autor Legendy Młodej Polski. Studiów o strukturze duszy kulturalnej, dostrzega skłonność do intelektualnej inicjatywy wolnej od pozytywistyczno-modernistycznych ograniczeń. Jak pokazuje historia filozofii, obydwaj wyróżnieni niemieccy klasycy metody transcendentalnej, traktują krytycyzm jako współczesną koncepcję wolności i odkrywczej, nieszablonowej myśli. Tymczasem dla Brzozowskiego krytycyzm jest sposobnością do ujęcia filozofii Kanta w formę wezwania do twórczego męstwa, a zarazem jest także marburskim postulatem, w myśl którego nie ma bytu poza wiecznym i nieustannym stawaniem się.

12

Concepts of pedagogy as an applied philosophy: Paul Natorp, John Dewey and Sergius Hessen

36%

Hanuszkiewicz W.

ARGUMENT: Biannual Philosophical Journal

|

2019

|

vol. 9

|

issue 2

201-223

EN

Paul Natorp, John Dewey and Sergius Hessen are usually considered to represent three different philosophical and pedagogical doctrines developed at the turn of the Twentieth century. These are, respectively: neo‐Kantianism, pragmatism and humanistic pedagogy widely rooted in Wil‐ helm Dilthey’s philosophy. Contrary to this common classification, Hessen himself described his own concept of pedagogy as an applied philosophy as a continuation of Natorp’s thought. However, Hessen also noted that an approach very similar to his one can be found (with some restrictions) in John Dewey’s theory. In this case, the fundamental issue is to determine the relationship between philosophy and pedagogical theory and practise. The main part of this article will identify the specificity of this relationship: the specificity implied by the concept of pedagogy understood as applied philosophy. The concept of pedagogy, understood as an applied philosophy in its theoretical and practical aspects, is the basis for critical reconstruction of social life in general. It is the opinion shared by all three philosophers that this type of reconstruction should be based on the communal dimension of basic social interactions, that is, on the communal dimension of work. The only way for the renewal of a different form of social life leads through regaining through them an essential communal dimension of human work. All three authors agreed that to regain the communal dimension of human work by another form of social interaction would only be possible when certain conditions are present; that is, when work will be permeated by individual creativity. The presence of such conditions shall be ensured by the educational community. Thus, the educational community should be a starting and end point for any critical social reconstruction as well as for the pedagogy understood as an applied philosophy.

13

Znajomość postaci i idei rosyjskiego neokantyzmu w Polsce

36%

Czardybon B., Biełow W. N.

Diametros

|

2017

|

issue 52

1-22

PL

Artykuł traktuje o głównych kierunkach badań nad rosyjskim neokantyzmem w Polsce. Jakkolwiek ilość i jakość badań nad dziejami rosyjskiego neokantyzmu nie może jeszcze równać się z badaniami w zakresie historii neokantyzmu niemieckiego, to sytuacja staje się tutaj coraz lepsza. Autorzy artykułu konstatują niezaprzeczalny postęp badań nad rosyjskim neokantyzmem w Polsce w ostatnich latach: pojawiają się monografie, artykuły, prace zbiorowe, projekty naukowe poświęcone postaciom i tematom związanym z historią rosyjskiego neokantyzmu. Autorzy uważają za płodny heurystycznie pogląd A. Norasa o ewolucji neokantyzmu w postneokantyzm. Jako jedną z głównych cech takiego rozwoju zakłada się ontologizację procesu poznania. Ten typowy dla rosyjskiego neokantyzmu, w szczególności dla S. Hessena, W. Sezemana, B. Jakowienki, „zwrot ontologiczny” z jednej strony stanowi wyróżnik całej filozofii rosyjskiej, a z drugiej zbliża filozoficzne próby rosyjskich neokantystów do koncepcji twórcy „nowej ontologii”, N. Hartmanna.

EN

The article deals with the main tendencies in the studies of Russian neo-Kantianism in Poland. Although the number and quality of research in the history of Russian neo-Kantianism still cannot be equated with those of the history of German neo-Kantianism, the situation of these studies is constantly changing for the better. The authors mark the undeniable progress in the studies of Russian neo-Kantianism in Poland in the recent years: there are monographs, articles, collections, research projects on particular thinkers or themes related to the history of Russian neo-Kantianism. The authors consider A. Noras’s idea of the development of neo-Kantianism into post-neo-Kantianism rather heuristic. One of the main features of this development is the ontologization of the cognitive process. This “ontological turn”, typical of Russian neo-Kantianism, in particular as represented by S. Hessen, V. Sesemann, B. Jakovenko, is, on the one hand, the hallmark of the entire Russian philosophy and, on the other, it brings together the philosophical efforts of Russian neo-Kantians and the conception of the author of the “new ontology” – N. Hartmann.

14

Hans Wagner jako neoneokantysta

31%

Pietras A.

Folia Philosophica

|

2018

|

vol. 39

EN

The aim of the paper is to briefly present the philosophy of Hans Wagner (1917-2000) as belonging to the last phase of the development of the German transcendental philosophy. Hans Wagner’s philosophy is presented as an attempt to synthesize earlier positions developed on the basis of this tradition, namely the synthesis of: (a) neo-Kantianism with post-neo-Kantianism, (b) Kant's philosophy with Hegel's philosophy, (c) neo-Kantian transcendentalism with Husserl's transcendentalism, (d) the philosophy of transcendental subject (Kant, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology) with the philosophy of empirical subject (Hönigswald, Heidegger, Sartre). The main theoretical figure of Hans Wagner’s philosophy is the problem of two aspects of human thinking: its absoluteness and finiteness. According to Wagner development of the philosophical reflection, which we can observe on the example of the evolution of - originating from Kant - transcendental philosophy, leads to an explanation of the possibility to reconcile these two aspects of human thinking, and thus to answer the very question: how is it possible that our thinking can be both absolute and finished, and what are the consequences of this fact for the status of all cultural products of human thinking, such as: science, morality or law.

PL

Celem artykułu jest krótkie przedstawienie filozofii Hansa Wagnera (1917-2000) jako należącej do ostatniej fazy rozwoju tradycji niemieckiej filozofii transcendentalnej. Filozofia Wagnera przedstawiona zostaje jako próba syntezy wcześniejszych stanowisk rozwiniętych na gruncie tej tradycji, a mianowicie jako synteza: (a) neokantyzmu z postneokantyzmem, (b) filozofii Kanta z filozofią Hegla, (c) transcendentalizmu neokantystów z transcendentalizmem Husserla, (d) filozofii podmiotu transcendentalnego (Kant, neokantyzm, fenomenologia) z filozofią podmiotu konkretnego (Hönigswald, Heidegger, Sartre). Podstawową figurę teoretyczną filozofii Hansa Wagnera stanowi problem dwuaspektowości myślenia ludzkiego: jego absolutności i skończoność zarazem. Zdaniem Wagnera rozwój refleksji filozoficznej, który obserwujemy na przykładzie ewolucji pochodzącej od Kanta tradycji filozofii transcendentalnej, prowadzi do wyjaśnienia możliwości pogodzenia tych dwóch aspektów ludzkiego myślenia, a więc do odpowiedzi na pytanie: jak to możliwe, że nasze myślenie może być jednocześnie absolutne i skończone, a także – jakie są tego konsekwencje dla statusu wszystkich kulturowych wytworów ludzkiego myślenia, takich jak: nauka, moralność czy prawo.

Refine search results

Znaczenie marburskiej szkoły neokantyzmu dla polskiej teorii i filozofii prawa

H. Cohens Ethik und ihre Rezeption in der russischen Philosophie des Rechts

Pojęcie samoświadomości w filozofii świadomości Paula Natorpa

Neokantyzm Fiodora Stiepuna

Znaniecki’s Key Insight: The Merger of Pragmatism and Neo-Kantianism

Johannes Volkelt a problem metafizyki

Neokrytyczna gnoseologia szkoły marburskiej Ujęcie Paula Natorpa

Rosyjski wariant neokantyzmu i postneokantyzmu

Max Brod - Felix Weltsch: Anschauung und Begriff : Grundzüge eines Systems der Begriffsbildung

An existential conception of culture

Miejsce krytycznej filozofii Immanuela Kanta i neokantyzmu Hermanna Cohena w refleksji Stanisława Leopolda Brzozowskiego

Concepts of pedagogy as an applied philosophy: Paul Natorp, John Dewey and Sergius Hessen

Znajomość postaci i idei rosyjskiego neokantyzmu w Polsce

Hans Wagner jako neoneokantysta