Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 6

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  network management
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
EN
The article presents the concept and the description of implementation of the system designed for monitoring and management of a computer network for the large company with a hybrid and distributed infrastructure. The system is based on a Nagios software, a software Multi Router Traffic Grapher, NdoUtils, a relational database management system MySQL, the visualization systems for Nagios (NagVis, NagMap) and a dedicated application that was created for the system, which allows on the presentation of monitored resources.
EN
Transition process in Poland involved the use of various tools to stimulate and increase the socioeconomic development in new conditions of a market economy. A very important direction was implementation of network solutions in the form of Special Economic Zones (SEZs). The networking nature of the solution was to create a common framework for action: economic, legal and organizational, which would apply to companies already existing in the Zones, but would also set the standard for new SEZs and their actors. The idea of creating special zones offering new attractive and unique conditions for business was new a new phenomenon in Poland. Usually operations in SEZs involve preferential conditions, which should lead to improvement of financial performance of such companies. The paper aims to determine the impact of SEZs on socio-economic development of Polish regions, using regions under endogenous development and supported by the European Union (EU) as frames of reference. The paper also aims to determine the impact of SEZs on scope of new investments, especially, FDI and unemployment.
EN
High quality teaching and research, the need for active interaction with business and public institutions require appropriate management, such as network management, based on the idea of transformational leadership. Among the new management model, which is especially significant in terms of networking of higher education institutions collective leadership is defined. The purpose of the article is to address the problem of collective leadership in the theory of network management in higher education. In modern Western educational literature there are several points of view to the interpretation of the concept of collective (distributive) leadership: 1) as a way of uniting and transforming it into a single professional community; 2) the qualitative dimension – a coordinated action as «permissible structuring effect on members, leading to coordinated action». The author has determined the following tasks of collective leadership: 1. The transfer of financial and administrative authority from head to all participants. 2. The division of responsibilities between all members. 3. Attracting new members of staff from other organizations in order to acquire new knowledge, skills and networking. 4. Organic division responsible positions between volunteers. Three conceptual aspects of distributive leadership, constituting its essence are defined: 1) distribution leadership is consistent effect of people working together, there is only a system of cooperation and create a situation in which the number and impact of joint actions is much greater than the sum of the individual; 2) distribution leadership assumes that the learning management involved more people than is usual in traditional management structures; 3) distributive leadership carries a variety of knowledge, experience and skill that enables development initiatives within the entire organization with its further development, adaptation and improvement in an atmosphere of support and trust. Much attention is drawn to the advantages and disadvantages of distributive leadership. The author has determined four advantages: 1) responsiveness; 2) transparency; 3) convenience; 4) teamwork. The disadvantages include: 1) fragmentation; 2) a lack of clarity of roles; 3) a slow decision-making; 4) differences in individual capacity. It is proved that collective leadership provides a new way of development - a parallel leadership that is a process where the teachers and leaders, their leaders participate in collective action that embodies a common goal.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono metody i środki zarządzania oraz optymalizacji dostępu do zasobów laboratorium sieci komputerowych. Zaprezentowano aplikacje do automatyzacji zapisu, odtwarzania konfiguracji urządzeń i gromadzenia wyników oraz wskazano protokoły, które mogą być użyte w tym celu. Zaproponowana została również metoda automatyzacji zmian konfiguracyjnych uzależniona od bieżącej analizy parametrów pomiarowych.
EN
The article presents the methods and means to manage and optimize access to a computer network laboratory resources. The applications to automate configuration saving and recovery process has been presented as well as the methods to collect the results. The authors gives the examples of protocols that can be used for these purpose. The proposed method can be also used to provide automatic configuration changes which depends on the current analysis of measurement parameters.
EN
This article presents the sources, nature and areas of criticism of governance. We will critically reflect on both its theoretical-normative and its pragmatic dimension. The conclusions we will arrive at will serve to highlight the main issues around which the study of the deficits of governance is focused. Finally, we will see four hypothetical scenarios for the evolution of the public governance paradigm emerge on the basis of the critical ref lection and the resulting conclusions.
PL
W artykule przedstawiono źródła, naturę i obszary krytyki współzarządzania publicznego. Uwagi wysuwane pod adresem tego paradygmatu zarządzania publicznego zostały omówione w podziale na krytykę jego teoretyczno- normatywnego oraz pragmatycznego wymiaru. Wnioski wynikające z przeprowadzonych analiz posłużyły do wyróżnienia głównych problemów, wokół których koncentruje się dyskusja o deficytach współzarządzania publicznego. W końcowej części artykułu nakreślono cztery hipotetyczne scenariusze ewolucji paradygmatu współzarządzania publicznego, skonstruowane na podstawie przeprowadzonych rozważań oraz konkluzji z nich wynikających.
6
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Neutralność sieciowa

45%
PL
Neutralność sieciowa oznacza jednakowe traktowanie wszystkich komunikatów przesyłanych w sieci Internet niezależnie od treści, wykorzystanej aplikacji lub usługi, urządzenia oraz adre-su nadawcy i odbiorcy. Neutralność sieciowa służy rozwojowi innowacyjnych treści i aplikacji w Internecie oraz ochronie wolności słowa i komunikowania się. Jej podstawowymi gwaran-cjami są: konkurencja i przejrzystość rynku usług dostępu do Internetu oraz łatwość zmiany dostawcy usług. Do współczesnych zagrożeń neutralności zaliczają się praktyki polegające na zarządzaniu ruchem w publicznych sieciach telekomunikacyjnych, integracja pionowa sieci z treś-ciami i aplikacjami, zero-rating, a także dążenia do zmiany modelu biznesowego działalności operatorów sieci. Środki techniczne stosowane przy zarządzaniu ruchem mogą także zagra-żać ochronie prywatności. Odpowiedzią na te zagrożenia stały się przepisy uchwalone w nie-których państwach członkowskich UE. Stosowne rozporządzenie ma zostać również przyjęte na poziomie unijnym.
EN
Network neutrality means that all electronic communications passing through a network are treated equally, independent of their content, application, service, device, or sender and receiver addresses. Network neutrality serves to promote the development of innovative online content and applications. It also plays an important role for the freedom of expression and the freedom to communicate. The basic requirements for network neutrality include: competition on the Internet access services market and its transparency, as well as ease of changing the provider of Internet access services. Current threats to network neutrality include: network management in public communications networks, vertical integration of network and content layers, zero-rating, as well as the proposals submitted by network operators to change their business model. Technical means employed in network management pose threats to the privacy of end-users. To counter these threats, several EU Member States have enacted strict national network neutrality laws. A draft Regulation on the open Internet has also been proposed on the EU level.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.