Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 3

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  ochrona praw autorskich
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Graduated Response – a Comprehensive Solution in the War Against Online Piracy?

100%
Czerniawski M.
Themis Polska Nova
|
2016
|
issue 2(11)
164-185
PL
Nasilenie się zjawiska naruszeń praw autorskich w Internecie przyczyniło się do powstania całkowicie nowych rozwiązań mających na celu walkę z nielegalną wymianą treści online. Powstał nowy model współpracy podmiotów uprawnionych z tytułu praw autorskich z dostawcami usług internetowych – tzw. graduated response. W jego najbardziej restrykcyjnej wersji dopuszcza on zawieszenie albo odcięcie usługi dostępu do Internetu naruszycielowi. Bezsprzecznie, podmiotom uprawnionym z tytułu praw autorskich potrzebne są narzędzia ochrony tych praw. W niniejszym artykule analizuję koncepcję graduated response wskazując jej zalety i wady oraz stwierdzając że warte rozwagi są rozwiązania alternatywne: notyfikacja-i-spowolnienie (notice-and-slowdown) oraz notyfikacja-i-notyfikacja (notice-and-notice). Poza wszelką wątpliwością własność intelektualna powinna być chroniona w Internecie. Powinno to się odbywać w sposób efektywny i jednocześnie z poszanowaniem praw i wolności usługobiorców, w szczególności ich prawa dostępu do Internetu.
EN
Escalation of online copyright infringements resulted in a worldwide shift in laws aimed at fighting illegal file sharing on the Internet. A new model of cooperation between copyright holders and Internet Service Providers was created. This cooperation is called the graduated response. In its most restrictive version this system allows suspension or even termination of the Internet service provided to the ISP’s subscriber who infringed copyrights. Copyright holders definitely need a tool that will help in protecting their interests. In this paper I analyze graduated response system in order to demonstrate its advantages and weaknesses. I conclude that legislators around the world should consider alternative solutions to the issue of online piracy such as the notice-and-slowdown and the notice-and-notice approach. I prove that intellectual property might and should be protected online in an effective manner which respects subscribers’ rights and freedoms, in particular the right to access to the Internet.
2
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AS ESSENTIAL KNOWLEDGE FOR STUDENTS

84%
Mandrazhy O.
International Journal of Legal Studies (IJOLS)
|
2017
|
issue 1(1)
203-220
EN
The article is dedicated to the revelation of important of study of the basis of law and on a few concrete examples based on mathematical material it has been shown the importance the validity of the legal questions raised.
PL
Artykuł poświęcony jest znaczeniu nauki prawa własności intelektualnej i praw autorskich w nauczaniu i działalności badawczej studentów. Dla podkreślenia tematu ukazano problem na kilku konkretnych przykładach opartych na materiale matematycznym, co ukazuje znaczenie ważności podnoszonych kwestii prawnych.
3
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Utwór audiowizualny w orzecznictwie

51%
Cywiński J.
Themis Polska Nova
|
2016
|
issue 2(11)
248-265
EN
The article in the eight paragraphs analyzes the issue of audiovisual work, in particular focusing on movie feature, providing the court rulings, in majority the Polish ones. The first section focuses on the clarification of the concept of an audiovisual work, using the textbook knowledge, the knowledge resulting from the polish Act of 4th February 1994 On Copyright and Related Rights and contained in the judgments of Polish courts, concluding that there is no leading definition of audiovisual work in the Polish legal system. Furthermore it considers the issue of co-authorship – who and to what extent has the right to call itself the creator of the audiovisual work. In this respect, it undertakes to clarify the contribution parts which pull together up the final image of an audiovisual work. In the next two sections it analyzes the beneficent of the audiovisual piece and defines the principles governing the relationship of beneficent and the author and the issue of remuneration for the authors work. In the fifth section it introduces the concept of collective management organizations, which is an organization that mediates the process of payment of accumulated remuneration to the creator. Section Six focuses on the issues of copyright protection and potential infringement, and states the rulings of courts, which allows reader to obtain a more practical understanding of the problem. Paragraph seventh evokes a complicated Polish case (the creator of „Stawka większa niż życie” vs. the creator of „Halo Hans!”). Finally paragraph eight focuses on a few cases executed in the field of copyright law in audiovisual work area in the United States.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.