Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  opakování
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Opakování jako součást utváření pracovního (doprovodného) rozhovoru

100%
Hoffmannová J., Havlík M.
Časopis pro moderní filologii (Journal for Modern Philology)
|
2021
|
vol. 103
|
issue 2
210-227
EN
This article is a primarily a stylistic analysis of a conversation taking place between colleagues working together. Emphasis is placed also on sociolinguistic factors (e.g., the asymmetry of the conversation and the distribution of the social roles of the two interlocutors) that result in the use of specific linguistic features (especially first-, second- and third-person singular and plural pronouns and verb forms such as the indicative, imperative and conditional moods and also the use of the infinitive) and a specific degree of “politeness” expressed in the conversation by one of the interlocutors. Methods of interactive linguistics are used to analyse repetition as an important conversational discourse strategy, and various types of repetition (e.g., intentional/unintentional, identical/modified, intensifying, confirmatory, corrective: “self-corrections” and corrections of the interlocutor) are distinguished with regard to prosody and sequential context. A detailed analysis of a short section of the conversation highlights the role played by gestures and facial expressions (also with regard to repetitions) in maintaining mutual intelligibility between the interlocutors and in coordinating their shared work.
2
Content available remote

"Věčnost je to pravé opakování.": Nietzsche, Kierkegaard a jejich repetitivní věčnosti

100%
Matějčková T.
Filosofický časopis (Philosophical Journal)
|
2023
|
vol. 71
|
issue 2
293-306
EN
We have found a particular, fundamental and, to this point in time, little-explored concordance between Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, essentially the two founders of modern continental philosophy. Both, that is to say, link eternity with recurrence. They also both emphasize that the will is central to this type of eternity – one must correctly want – while at the same time linking recurrence with the core of reality itself, with the core of the world. This union of eternity and recurrence is, moreover, linked in both cases with the rejection of existing metaphysics. The author of the study queries the connection between these thusly-conceived “repetitive eternities.” At the same time she makes reference to the interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche that was put forth by Pavel Kouba, the interpreter who emphasized that the very heart of eternal return is recurrence.
CS
U dvou takřka zakladatelů moderní kontinentální filosofie nacházíme zvláštní, zásadní a dosud málo probádanou shodu. Kierkegaard i Nietzsche spojují věčnost s opakováním. Oba přitom zdůrazňují, že pro tento typ věčnosti je stěžejní vůle – člověk musí správně chtít –, ale zároveň spojují opakování se samým nitrem skutečnosti, s nitrem světa. Sepětí věčnosti a opakování se kromě toho v obou případech pojí s odmítnutím dosavadní metafyziky. Autorka studie se táže po souvislosti takto pojatých „repetitivních věčností“. Navazuje přitom na interpretaci Friedricha Nietzscheho, tak jak ji předložil Pavel Kouba. Právě tento interpret zdůraznil, že samým jádrem věčného návratu je opakování.
3
Content available remote

„Smutná píseň je ve vzduchu” : Opakování jako textová strategie zpřítomňování skrytého

80%
Kazalarská Z., Marešová I.
Česká literatura (Czech Literature)
|
2012
|
vol. 60
|
issue 2
147-172
EN
This article is devoted to intratextual, auto-intertextual, and intertextual research on rhetorical figures of literary repetition from the perspective of the 'emotional turn' in contemporary literary studies, based chiefly on the research of Gernot Böhme (b. 1937) and of Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht (b. 1948). A key concept of repetition here is textual strategy, how to evince the latent, concealed, and elusive elements of the text. The staarting point of the text consists not only in the latent phenomenon of atmosphere as a phenomenon of perception, but also, indeed in particular, in the question of the production of the atmospheres of the means of poetic language (the 'textual atmosphere' aspect), the question of the reproduction or quotation of the textual atmosphere (the 'intertextual atmospheres' aspect), and the question of 'intermedia migration' of atmospheres amongst the spheres of music and literature (the 'intermedia atmosphere' aspect). The article seeks to demontrate the operative potential of the proposed concepts first in an analytical part, which considers research on one 'atmospheric' verse from the poem 'Homesick Blues' by Langston Hughes (1902-1967) and its individual repetitions in the lyric verse of Ivan Blatný (1919-1990), Josef Kainar (1917-1971), and Miroslav Holub (1923-1998). The last part of the article focuses on problems of repetition as seen by adherents of structuralism and deconstruction, and proposes to understand repetition more broadly as oscillation not only between the poles of iterativity and iterability, but also between sense (Sinn) and presence (Präsenz).
4
Publication available in full text mode
Content available

Konflikt a věcnost ve filozofii Petra Rezka: Dialektika citujícího rozumu

80%
Kolman V.
Svět literatury – Časopis pro novodobé literatury (World of Literature – Journal for Modern Literatures)
|
2023
|
vol. 33
|
issue 68
113-129
EN
The paper deals with Petr Rezek’s philosophy in relation to two of his central themes, matter-of-factness (Sachlichkeit) and conflict, through the prism of the problem of non-matter-of-fact (unsachlich) quoting and its manifestations. According to Rezek, these point to the defective forms of intersubjectivity. The dialectic of quoting reason begins with a critique of these forms in order to become a true dialectic of matter-of-factness, through contrasting structures and techniques of analysis, such as the so-called boundary approach or the method of repetition.
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.