Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

Results found: 4

first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last

Search results

Search:
in the keywords:  płód
help Sort By:

help Limit search:
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
1
100%
EN
The article aims to analyze the Old Testament’s idea of life before birth. Firstly, I examine some expressions describing sexual intercourse. Secondly, I study the meaning of the word הרה hārāh “to conceive”. Thirdly, I analyze some crucial texts (ad es. Rdz 25, 21– 24; Wj 21, 22–25; Hi 10; Ps 139). At the end, I offer a brief synthesis of the Old Testament’s idea about life between conception and birth.
EN
The article rejects various attempts to negate the subjectivity of human embryos, formulated among others in the Polish debate entitled “Mother cells - life for a life?” and organized by the Ministry of Scientific Research and Information Technology in 2003 and 2004. The author thinks that the proposal to treat a human embryo as a deceased donor of organs is wrong both in the field of embryology and philosophical anthropology. It is also wrong to question the subjectivity of the human embryo using various criteria of growth (developed nervous system, brain, consciousness, participation in the life of society, and looking after one's own interests). These criteria do not define humanity but describe a human being in various phases of expressions of his/her human nature. That is why it is not acceptable to make the right to life conditional on the stage and degree of the actualization of humanity. Furthermore, one cannot justify the deprivation of the subjectivity of human embryos because of medical progress and the so-called good of humankind. The acceleration of progress cannot be done at the cost of the life of some group of human beings.
PL
W artykule odrzucono różne próby zanegowania podmiotowości embrionu ludzkiego, sformułowane m.in. w polskiej debacie „Komórki macierzyste - życie za życie?” zorganizowanej przez Ministerstwo Nauki i Informatyzacji w 2003 i 2004 r. Autora staje na stanowisku, że propozycja traktowania embrionu ludzkiego jako zmarłego dawcy narządów jest błędna zarówno w dziedzinie embriologii, jak i antropologii filozoficznej. Błędem jest także kwestionowanie podmiotowości embrionu ludzkiego za pomocą różnych kryteriów wzrostu (rozwinięty układ nerwowy, mózg, świadomość, udział w życiu społeczeństwa i dbanie o własne interesy). Kryteria te bowiem nie definiują człowieczeństwa, lecz opisują człowieka w różnych fazach wyrażania jego ludzkiej natury. Dlatego nie do przyjęcia jest uzależnienie prawa do życia od stopnia i poziomu urzeczywistnienia się człowieczeństwa. Ponadto nie można usprawiedliwić pozbawienia podmiotowości ludzkiego embrionu postępem medycyny i tak zwanym dobrem ludzkości. Przyspieszenie postępu nie może odbywać się kosztem życia jakiejś grupy ludzi. 
PL
tłumaczenie traktatu Pseudo-Galena
EN
The article makes an attempt to decode the concept of the human conception in the mothers womb represented by the Apostle of Nations. His opinion in this issue is based on two fragments from the Old Testament: Jb 10: 8–10 and Ps 139: 13–16. They represent the one seed theory, saying that a new man is formed only from the man’s seed; the role of the mother comes down to be a container receiving male semen. They also express a conviction, that every human life is under God’s special protection from the very beginning. Therefore it demands a total respect, the same respect as for a child already born. The article analyze also three expressions of embryological meaning, used by St. Paul: “from the mother’s womb” (ἐκ κοιλίας μητρός; Ga 1: 15), “Christ is formed in you” (μορφωθῇ; Ga 4: 19) and “child born abnormally” (ἔκτρωμα; 1 Kor 15: 8).
first rewind previous Page / 1 next fast forward last
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.